Page 1 of 2

The Tankette.

Posted: 2007-02-27 09:14am
by TheMuffinKing
Image

Simple. Elegant. Cramped.

A single person tankette for those troublesome alleyways!

Posted: 2007-02-27 06:04pm
by Tasoth
Second Story RPG attack FTW!

Seriously, it looks sooooo easy to hit from the top and rear. The position of the MG means you have to come out of the hatch to fire it and therefore stop moving. You also are fucked on firing that rearward. I put it in a small turret on top.

Posted: 2007-02-27 07:08pm
by Stark
Tankettes DO suck, it's just being accurate to the inspiration.

Posted: 2007-02-28 05:42am
by Ford Prefect
It's so cute!

Posted: 2007-02-28 09:04am
by TheMuffinKing
Thanks! I'm thinking of another design... I'll get around to it soon.

Posted: 2007-02-28 09:06am
by Big Orange
Tankettes were of limited tactical use as long ago as WWII - the only fairly successfull tankette was the British Universal Carrier, although TheMuffinKing's drawing is very good at encapsulating the awkward gait and vulnerability of tankettes in general.

Posted: 2007-02-28 06:32pm
by LeftWingExtremist
Big Orange wrote:Tankettes were of limited tactical use as long ago as WWII - the only fairly successfull tankette was the British Universal Carrier, although TheMuffinKing's drawing is very good at encapsulating the awkward gait and vulnerability of tankettes in general.
Was the universal(bren) carrier even a tank? I thought it was more of an APC.

Posted: 2007-02-28 06:44pm
by SilverWingedSeraph
Awww... it's adorable! Who's a cute widdle tankette? You are! Yes you are!

Posted: 2007-02-28 09:20pm
by Elheru Aran
LeftWingExtremist wrote:
Big Orange wrote:Tankettes were of limited tactical use as long ago as WWII - the only fairly successfull tankette was the British Universal Carrier, although TheMuffinKing's drawing is very good at encapsulating the awkward gait and vulnerability of tankettes in general.
Was the universal(bren) carrier even a tank? I thought it was more of an APC.
Very lightly armoured so it was indeed more of an APC, but it performed more of an cargo carrying function; also towed trailers, I believe. There may have been enclosed versions for combat use, but AFAIK they weren't used in that function too often.

Posted: 2007-03-05 07:04am
by Big Orange
Image

The Universal Carrier essentially looks like a tankette APC to me and could be cited as a reasonably successful tankette.

Posted: 2007-03-05 07:59am
by Stark
Eh? Tankettes are turretless, one or two man tanks. That's regular tank size, with a flat bed for troops/mortars/etc.

Posted: 2007-03-05 01:14pm
by TheMuffinKing
That thing actually looks useful. Limitedly useful, granted, but something that could be of benefit to a garrison force or something.

Posted: 2007-03-06 11:06am
by Thirdfain
That "limitedly useful" thing there is the most widely produced AFV in history, actually :)

At least according to Wikipedia. The Bren carrier was a very handy tool- a cheap motor vehicle with all-terrain capacity and some armor protection against small arms. It was used extensively to carry mortars and other light weapons.

Posted: 2007-03-06 02:45pm
by LaserRifleofDoom
The essential problem with tankettes is the easy availability of RPGs. If all you had to worry about was rifles (and hand grenades), then it would be realtively easy to produce a two-man vehicle that could patrol alleyways safely.
Image

GENTLEMEN, BEHOLD!

Posted: 2007-03-12 11:13am
by TheMuffinKing
The Microtank. My sequel to the tankette.

Image


Yet another example of the pinnacle of tiny tanks of dubious usefulness!

Posted: 2007-03-12 12:35pm
by MKSheppard
Two man? This will do nicely for the HAB super ultra light anti-riot tanklet

Posted: 2007-03-12 12:52pm
by TheMuffinKing
Yes, two man crew is the standard. I muzt now draw the 3 man command variant!

Posted: 2007-03-12 02:02pm
by Redleader34
TheMuffinKing, Do you play advance Wars? this looks like the standard tank from that game.

Posted: 2007-03-12 02:07pm
by TheMuffinKing
I've always wanted to play Advance Wars, but I have Nintendo stuff. As for the tank, it just came to me a few hours ago. I wanted another micro tank and this just happened after a few design revisions.

I'm honored I guess, for the comparison to a product from a reasonably well selling game! :D

Posted: 2007-03-12 04:39pm
by Sidewinder
Forget the tankette, just make a super-sized SWORDS robot. The tankette cannot have enough armor to protect its crew without becoming a full-sized tank, making the whole concept utterly impractical in modern warfare.

Posted: 2007-03-13 03:03am
by TheMuffinKing
Fye to that, our secret force demands capabilities unavailable to even the best remote control killing machine!

Besides, SWORDS are expensive, people are cheap and numerous.

Posted: 2007-03-13 10:22am
by MKSheppard
HAB Tanklet, Riot Control, Ultra Lightweight (Class XXX Riots Only)

Image

Posted: 2007-03-13 02:29pm
by Coyote
Isn't the Alvis Scorpion really sort of a Tankette? The Bren Gun Carrier really struck me as a sort of "Jeep with Treads".

Posted: 2007-03-13 03:56pm
by Ritterin Sophia
MKSheppard wrote:HAB Tanklet, Riot Control, Ultra Lightweight (Class XXX Riots Only)
Shouldn't that be Super Featherweight? :P

Posted: 2007-03-13 06:17pm
by MKSheppard
Image
HAB Ultra Light Anti Mecha Infantryman, Siberian Front, 82313 GL

Due to a mix up in orders, the 2341st Desert Light Division was sent to an arctic wasteland, and supplied with weapons from the 1294th Jungle division.

In keeping with HAB "Maximum use" policy, the handgrips on the Rocket laucnher are made of rare rain forest hardwood, while the loadbearing vest the soldier is wearing is made of Zebra hide.

The rockets are colorcoded:

BLUE: HAB Super Asphyxiant Agents
YELLOW: HAB Super Mustard Gas
GREEN: HAB Super Suffocating Agents