Page 1 of 1

The Ruined Roman city of Caesarea (N56K)

Posted: 2008-04-29 03:55am
by The Grim Squeaker
A visit to the ancient formerly Roman city of Caesarea in the north of Israel. The best shots had family members in them, so this is what's left :D.





Image





Image







Image


Image

Image


Image


Image



Image




Image





Image


Image



Image
Image

Yes, I did adjust the WB and Stops, as well as going in good weather. But comments and critique as always are welcomed and desired :).

Posted: 2008-04-29 07:15am
by Zixinus
I like the one with the chariots. What does it symbolise?

Posted: 2008-04-29 07:20am
by The Grim Squeaker
Zixinus wrote:I like the one with the chariots. What does it symbolise?
It symbolizes a statue of a roman chariot with 4 horses attached :P . It's on the track of the old racetrack/Palladium?

Posted: 2008-04-30 11:35am
by Sarevok
It's amazing. How much of the structures are from antiquity and how much built in later years ?

Posted: 2008-05-01 03:47am
by The Grim Squeaker
Sarevok wrote:It's amazing. How much of the structures are from antiquity and how much built in later years ?
Very little. A few stones were replaced, but not on anything shown here, the iron horse statue is new, not sure about the sea-front fortress in shot 3+4,the powerplants in the distance (Coal) are new.
The city was conquered by the Muslims around 1273 I think (give or take a century), and was a Roman city (Caesarea means "City of Caesar") before over 1,000 years beforehand. There's a massive aqueduct system along the coast there (Which isn't seen) that's still in amazing condition.

Those Romans built things to last for longer than todays America. Amazing.

Posted: 2008-05-01 06:07pm
by Coiler
Image

I'm guessing that the roof on that one wasn't built by Rome.... :P

Posted: 2008-05-03 08:20pm
by Alerik the Fortunate
The second picture is definitely after 12th century; there wouldn't have been pointed arched rib vaults before then. The carving on the corbels looks like around 13th century. Are there crusader fortifications there?

Posted: 2008-05-04 04:54am
by The Grim Squeaker
Alerik the Fortunate wrote:The second picture is definitely after 12th century; there wouldn't have been pointed arched rib vaults before then. The carving on the corbels looks like around 13th century. Are there crusader fortifications there?
As I recall, yes, I'm quite sure that the first shot of the lined walls is, along with the shot you mentioned and maybe some more of the fortifications.
coiler wrote:I'm guessing that the roof on that one wasn't built by Rome....
The Romans were big on metal and preserving their atriums, dontcha know ;). (I also saw a bunch of tourists letting their kids run rampant over the mosaics that roof was built to prevent :x )

Posted: 2008-05-07 04:42pm
by Melchior
DEATH wrote: The Romans were big on metal and preserving their atriums, dontcha know ;). (I also saw a bunch of tourists letting their kids run rampant over the mosaics that roof was built to prevent :x )
You would probably be appalled by what tourists dare to do in Rome; I've personally seen people trying to chip away stones from the catacombs.