Page 1 of 2

What's wrong with this Tomcat?

Posted: 2003-02-21 11:05pm
by Vympel
http://www.keymags.co.uk/dcforum/User_f ... fa65ba.jpg

Next time- when the front-seater is doing a negative-G maneuver, LOOK at what you're grabbing onto.

Posted: 2003-02-21 11:13pm
by HemlockGrey
The cockpit is open. That can't be very good.

Posted: 2003-02-21 11:14pm
by Spanky The Dolphin
Good thing he has a helmet on...

Posted: 2003-02-21 11:15pm
by Ted
The back seater fucking EJECTED!

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:05am
by kojikun
Is there anyone in the fucking cockpit? WTF?

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:11am
by Kuja
Looks like Goose hit the wrong button. :D

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:12am
by Jim Raynor
WTF?! Where did you get this from?

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:13am
by VF5SS
That was really bad, IG-88 :D

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:17am
by Spanky The Dolphin
kojikun wrote:Is there anyone in the fucking cockpit? WTF?
I'd say there is, seeing as you can still see the damn pilot in the fucking cockpit. :roll:

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:27am
by Kuja
VF5SS wrote:That was really bad, IG-88 :D
Come now,tellme you didn't get a laugh out of that one.:mrgreen:

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:29am
by Exonerate
F-14 is a two-seater. I think his partner got ejected...

I just hope his parachute worked.

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:33am
by kojikun
i dont see a pilot.. o_o

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:38am
by Kuja
kojikun wrote:i dont see a pilot.. o_o
koji, look very carefully right behind the end of the forward canopy. If you can't see the pilot's head, you need you vision checked.

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:40am
by VF5SS
IG-88E wrote:
VF5SS wrote:That was really bad, IG-88 :D
Come now,tellme you didn't get a laugh out of that one.:mrgreen:
Actually, I was thinking about doing a Topgun joke... Thankfully, good taste prevailed :D

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:41am
by kojikun
THATS the pilots helmet? Boxy. Originally thought it was part of the chair. pic too small i guess.

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:42am
by Kuja
VF5SS wrote:Actually, I was thinking about doing a Topgun joke... Thankfully, good taste prevailed :D
Actually, the first thing I wanted to put down was "GOOOOOOOOSE!"

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:43am
by Enlightenment
The backseater is never going to live that down...

Posted: 2003-02-22 12:48am
by Sea Skimmer
Ejection system must have been set to manual; otherwise they should have both been punched out. Good thing, since otherwise we'd be down another F-14.

Posted: 2003-02-22 01:33am
by Wicked Pilot
Sea Skimmer wrote:Ejection system must have been set to manual; otherwise they should have both been punched out. Good thing, since otherwise we'd be down another F-14.
That may not be the case. I've never flown an F-14, but on the T-38 the ejection seats were independent of each other.

Posted: 2003-02-22 01:43am
by Howedar
F-14s have some linkage settings.

Posted: 2003-02-22 02:21am
by weemadando
Wicked Pilot wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:Ejection system must have been set to manual; otherwise they should have both been punched out. Good thing, since otherwise we'd be down another F-14.
That may not be the case. I've never flown an F-14, but on the T-38 the ejection seats were independent of each other.
Thats so the instructor can dump the n00b if he gets angry...

Posted: 2003-02-22 02:37am
by Sea Skimmer
Wicked Pilot wrote:
Sea Skimmer wrote:Ejection system must have been set to manual; otherwise they should have both been punched out. Good thing, since otherwise we'd be down another F-14.
That may not be the case. I've never flown an F-14, but on the T-38 the ejection seats were independent of each other.
That's probably because its and old and fairly cheep plane meant only for training, and the trainee is more likely to punch out when its unnecessary then to wait too long.. All multi seat combat aircraft have a linked setting. IIRC in most US combat twin seater the pilot cannot be ejected with the back seater still in as they would be hit by the front seats rocket exhaust. The back seater alone can however eject

Posted: 2003-02-22 04:01am
by Shinova
My response upon seeing that pic:

Photoshop.

Posted: 2003-02-22 04:32am
by Vympel
Shinova wrote:My response upon seeing that pic:

Photoshop.
*sigh*

it's not a photoshop.

http://www.keymags.co.uk/dcforum/DCForumID2/6730.html

The forum from whence it came.

Posted: 2003-02-22 10:00am
by Tsyroc
IG-88E wrote:
VF5SS wrote:That was really bad, IG-88 :D
Come now,tellme you didn't get a laugh out of that one.:mrgreen:

Actually I got a good laugh out of that one. That Tomcat happens to belong to VF-213 Blacklions. That squadron was stationed on my ship during the last deployment I was on. Most of the people that knew anything about that squadron called them the "sealions" instead of the Blacklions because they put so many planes in the water.

I swear that squadron is jinxed. Besides the funny stuff like the picture and a couple of costly but mostly harmless planes in the water fiascos, I know of at least two fatal crashes involving that squadron. On my last cruise one plane came in too low and smashed into the back of the ship. Some of the plane skidded across the flight deck while the rest fell onto the faintail. The pilot died but I think the RIO survived.

The other accident involved one of the USN's first female fighter pilots. Again I think she died but her RIO survived. There was a big deal about this one in the media for a lot of political reasons. Personally I alwasy thought she had the bad luck to go to that squadron.

I'm thinking that part of the reason the radar operator survived in the two crashes I mentioned might be because they have their hands free and are a little quicker on the eject than the pilots?