Page 1 of 1
Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-01-09 11:18pm
by Isolder74
I went ahead and modified a Transformer that has a Delorian Alt mode into the Delorian Time Machine from Back To The Future. Not sure how good of a job I did but take look at my efforts.
I built it with the Mr Fusion upgrade.
Before I'd painted the Robot Mode
I painted the robot trying to make it look like 'Lifevest' Marty.
As I said not sure how good of a job I did modding there toy. I got the parts from some left over lego pieces.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-01-10 05:39am
by madd0ct0r
nice work, but blurry photos don't help.
Macro mode, white piece of paper under feet and curved up to vertical background so camera focuses on mini, no flash but good lighting and timer on so camera is not wobbled when you press the button.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-01-10 07:13am
by Isolder74
I know but my good camera went cablooie and haven't been able to get a new one. Taken with the one on my phone.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-01-10 06:23pm
by Solauren
Nice job.
I'd have made the Mr Fusion and related stuff a removable shield personally, but to each their own.
Oh, go read Swindler's TFwiki.net article. You'll laugh your ass off at the 'best transformer ever line'.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-01-11 10:24am
by Isolder74
I have it is what inspired the idea in the first place.
Of course this member of the race patrol can only get up to 88 mph now.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-01-15 02:49am
by Marko Dash
that reminds me of an image i cant seem to find for the life of me.
it was the top gear presenters picking fictional cars to race. IIRC Hammond had picked the Initial D Toyota AE86, Clarkson had chosen the Mach 5, and then May pulls up in the BTTF Delorian.
they start arguing over whether using time travel counts as jumping the gun, that distracts them from the Stig finishing the race in Luke's landspeeder.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-02-02 12:24pm
by Enigma
Looks nice. Reminds me more of a Go-Bot than a Transformer.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-02-03 09:27pm
by Isolder74
Enigma wrote: ↑2020-02-02 12:24pm
Looks nice. Reminds me more of a Go-Bot than a Transformer.
It is based on a micromaster so that does make sense.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-10 10:26am
by Isolder74
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-10 02:42pm
by Solauren
Then non-limited edition version will be released in October or so.
I agree, the scalpers for anything or a problem. Have you seen what people are charging for the Generation Selects Seacons? $300 USD for a DELUXE?
It's no wonder third party stuff does so well.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-10 07:18pm
by Isolder74
I still think it's hilarious that someone obviously wanting to ride the coattails of this posted a modded Swindler figure on E-Bay to see if they can scam someone into buying it possibly thinking it's one of the real ones.
My thoughts on the matter is let these jerks end up sitting on worthless toys because no one buys their marked up versions. My biggest concern about the October release is if these yahoos do it again making that one impossible to get too.
Then again who at Hasbro thought it was a good idea to release the first run of this toy with ONLY 1985 pieces. I'd love to have been in that board meeting. It's funny when the Ecto-1 transformer came out they didn't only make 1984 of that so I just don't understand.
And no a Hasbro repaint of the Terrorcons into Seacons is NOT worth $300.
On that note, I am patient. I waited until a few months back to buy a Devestator at retail prices instead of being a overpriced one on E-Bay.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-10 07:43pm
by bilateralrope
Isolder74 wrote: ↑2020-07-10 07:18pmThen again who at Hasbro thought it was a good idea to release the first run of this toy with ONLY 1985 pieces. I'd love to have been in that board meeting. It's funny when the Ecto-1 transformer came out they didn't only make 1984 of that so I just don't understand.
Moves like that always make me wonder if someone making the decision is one of the price gougers.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-10 08:27pm
by Isolder74
bilateralrope wrote: ↑2020-07-10 07:43pm
Isolder74 wrote: ↑2020-07-10 07:18pmThen again who at Hasbro thought it was a good idea to release the first run of this toy with ONLY 1985 pieces. I'd love to have been in that board meeting. It's funny when the Ecto-1 transformer came out they didn't only make 1984 of that so I just don't understand.
Moves like that always make me wonder if someone making the decision is one of the price gougers.
Well for the 2002 Olympics someone thinking they were clever only made 2002 copies of the opening ceremony pin which made everyone trying to get one at the event angry.
I have yet to understand how anyone thinks stuff like that is a good idea. In the case of the pin, even having 10,000 wouldn't have been enough consider more than that showed up to the event.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-11 09:56am
by Solauren
2002 of each 'series' makes more sense for the Olympics
i.e 1908 of 2002, Series 1
They'd have to make like 400 series, but still, that would have meet true demand.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-11 09:58am
by Solauren
Isolder74 wrote: ↑2020-07-10 07:18pm
And no a Hasbro repaint of the Terrorcons into Seacons is NOT worth $300.
Actually, there apparently is some (minor) re-engineering and replaced parts for their 'Beast modes', and a sixth full sized deluxe member.
Doing it yourself with the POTP Terrorcons would probably run the costs above $300.
Still, not worth scalper prices.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-11 07:45pm
by Isolder74
Nothing is worth the scalper's prices.
Re: Delorian Time Machine Transformer
Posted: 2020-07-14 08:53am
by Solauren
Isolder74 wrote: ↑2020-07-11 07:45pm
Nothing is worth the scalper's prices.
Generally not, no.