StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Posted: **2004-04-16 08:14pm**

ooohhh nice.....

Posted: **2004-04-16 08:34pm**

Very cool!
Next, you must bring us something with more engines, if you know what I mean....

Posted: **2004-04-16 10:17pm**

Frank Hipper wrote:Very cool!
Next, you must bring us something with more engines, if you know what I mean....

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Armour/TexanLady.png

This work?

Posted: **2004-04-16 10:20pm**

Nose Art of "Texan Lady", close up.

Posted: **2004-04-16 10:21pm**

*masturbates furiously*

Give us a version in Vietnam jungle camo next, Shep!

Posted: **2004-04-16 10:31pm**

Frank Hipper wrote:*masturbates furiously*

Give us a version in Vietnam jungle camo next, Shep!

Layers are your friend.....as is VDL Camouflage

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Armour/BigTrouble.png

Posted: **2004-04-16 10:38pm**

Someone STOP ME before I wank
off too much with layers!

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Armour/Rus ... dLease.png

Posted: **2004-04-17 12:12am**

Lovely.

Next up, a B39?

Posted: **2004-04-17 01:36am**

MKSheppard wrote:*snip*

You can have your "Terminator" MK...I'll take this baby:

I'll even dogfight your "Terminator" as opposed to blasting it from 24 nautical miles away.

Posted: **2004-04-17 01:54am**

Robert Walper wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:*snip*
You can have your "Terminator" MK...I'll take this baby:

<snip picture>

I'll even dogfight your "Terminator" as opposed to blasting it from 24 nautical miles away.

Heh. It'd be a waste of missiles anyway.

But you'd take your sweet time getting it in a dogfight. The F-22's just too freaking fast to make an effective twisting WW2 style dogfight. Overshoot too much, pull too many Gs trying to make the turns.

Posted: **2004-04-17 01:56am**

Shouldn't the observation blisters be plated over? SAC B-36s in TBO are all Featherweight birds.

And all that paint is reducing the mighty Peacemaker's performance!

Posted: **2004-04-17 02:38am**

Shep, reduce the size of your pics...I'm putting them as links currently.

Posted: **2004-04-17 03:50am**

phongn wrote:And all that paint is reducing the mighty Peacemaker's performance!

The Peacemaker has performance?

Posted: **2004-04-17 03:53am**

Crayz9000 wrote:
phongn wrote:And all that paint is reducing the mighty Peacemaker's performance!
The Peacemaker has performance?

Oh my, but someone needs a schoolin'!

Posted: **2004-04-17 04:31am**

Robert Walper wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:*snip*
You can have your "Terminator" MK...I'll take this baby:

I'll even dogfight your "Terminator" as opposed to blasting it from 24 nautical miles away.

Well if you want to go there, I'll take this:

Posted: **2004-04-17 04:34am**

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Robert Walper wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:*snip*
You can have your "Terminator" MK...I'll take this baby:

I'll even dogfight your "Terminator" as opposed to blasting it from 24 nautical miles away.
Well if you want to go there, I'll take this:

I must say I prefer the look of the Russian plane over the F22.

Posted: **2004-04-17 04:37am**

Comosicus wrote:
Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:
Robert Walper wrote: You can have your "Terminator" MK...I'll take this baby:

I'll even dogfight your "Terminator" as opposed to blasting it from 24 nautical miles away.
Well if you want to go there, I'll take this:

I must say I prefer the look of the Russian plane over the F22.

I'll take the F-22 since it was built and works, and the Su-47 was never put into operation.

Posted: **2004-04-17 04:51am**

Rogue 9 wrote:
Comosicus wrote: I must say I prefer the look of the Russian plane over the F22.
I'll take the F-22 since it was built and works, and the Su-47 was never put into operation.

That can't stop me to like the Su-47 better

Posted: **2004-04-17 10:59am**

Comosicus wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote:
Comosicus wrote: I must say I prefer the look of the Russian plane over the F22.
I'll take the F-22 since it was built and works, and the Su-47 was never put into operation.
That can't stop me to like the Su-47 better

Unfortunately, the F22 Raptor's stealth capabilities is going to spell trouble for you. You cannot hit something you do not know is there.

Posted: **2004-04-17 12:36pm**

Well it will need that Stealth capability to get past the congressiona accounting committee....

Posted: **2004-04-17 01:21pm**

Robert Walper wrote:
Comosicus wrote:
Rogue 9 wrote: I'll take the F-22 since it was built and works, and the Su-47 was never put into operation.
That can't stop me to like the Su-47 better
Unfortunately, the F22 Raptor's stealth capabilities is going to spell trouble for you. You cannot hit something you do not know is there.

Look you didn't get it right. I didn't say ANYTHING about Su-47 BEING BETTER than F22. I just said I LIKE THE LOOK better. Check it in my previous posts.

Posted: **2004-04-17 08:00pm**

Shep, you should replace the skull at the nose with a T-800 endoskull like this one

Posted: **2004-04-17 08:13pm**

Comosicus wrote:
Robert Walper wrote:
Comosicus wrote: That can't stop me to like the Su-47 better
Unfortunately, the F22 Raptor's stealth capabilities is going to spell trouble for you. You cannot hit something you do not know is there.
Look you didn't get it right. I didn't say ANYTHING about Su-47 BEING BETTER than F22. I just said I LIKE THE LOOK better. Check it in my previous posts.

All right, fine. Redirect all previous points to Einy.

Posted: **2004-04-18 03:37pm**

Hey now, shep, quit stealing my ideas!

I had dibs on that noseart long before you.

Anyhoo, here's what me and my limited PSP skills did with it a while back.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

All hail the Terminator!

All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!

Re: All hail the Terminator!