StarDestroyer.Net BBS

hi
i had a little spare time during spring break and started making a mech.
the arms are not finished yet and the head and the link between upper and lower body sections are still missing entierly.
i´m quite satisfied with the feet, the legs, the lower body and the shoulders, even though i might add some more detail to the shoulders. i don´t like the upper body and i´ll redo it if i find the time.

atm i can´t think of a good head. maybe something round in order to take up the round elements from knees and feet? whatcha think?

+++http://www.geocities.com/bettlerfront/i ... cke/02.jpg

(gotta copy&paste minus the "+++" since it´s geocities)

it has a HUGE penis protection

Comosicus wrote:it has a HUGE penis protection

that´s because of it´s huge penis which i used my own as reference for.
(actually that´s the power generator)


i forgot to mention that the mech is based on a front mission mech.

salm wrote:

Comosicus wrote:it has a HUGE penis protection

that´s because of it´s huge penis which i used my own as reference for.
(actually that´s the power generator)


i forgot to mention that the mech is based on a front mission mech.

Don't know much about mechs, nut it looks nice. And one thing I really light is that I can see it very well. Hte lighting is proper made.

*Thinking of FuzzyModem's dark pictures*

Like you pointed out very much Front Mission flair to it.

For a start without the details going into it(gun ports or whatnot)...nicely done.

very nice, but it doesnt look like it could move very well, lookes kinda sluggish really. Still really cools tho

Am I allowed to hate you? Looks good, but the legs look a little spindly for the body.

I dont see a link...how do you get to see the picture?

18-Till-I-Die wrote:I dont see a link...how do you get to see the picture?

Copy the URL and past into a new window, removing the +++ at the begining.

He sais it in the OP. Read more carefully

Comosicus wrote:

18-Till-I-Die wrote:I dont see a link...how do you get to see the picture?

Copy the URL and past into a new window, removing the +++ at the begining.

He sais it in the OP. Read more carefully

I dont knwo what that means...i suck at computers

_FIST_ Mecha...?





Good modeling skills tho, too bad it's a mecha...

Einhander Sn0m4n wrote:_FIST_ Mecha...?

*FIRES RAILGUN SALVOZ AT FUCKING TYPO!!!! DIE!!! DIE!!! DIE!!!*

er... i mean, typo corrected.

18-Till-I-Die wrote:

Comosicus wrote:

18-Till-I-Die wrote:I dont see a link...how do you get to see the picture?

Copy the URL and past into a new window, removing the +++ at the begining.

He sais it in the OP. Read more carefully

I dont knwo what that means...i suck at computers

Open another window of your browser, select with your mouse the line starting with +++ in the first post (without the 3 pluses), right click>copy then click on the address field of the new window right click>Paste>enter

Pretty good. I think the feet are a bit tiny tho, it might just fall forwards.

EDIT: or backwards.

EDIT2: or sideways, if you look at it too hard. In fact, in soft ground those thin needle-like toes are going to dig right into the dirt and won't really support much of anything.

EDIT3: crap, they're going to dig right thru concrete, considering the weigh of the whole thing.

I finally got it, i figured out how to copy and paste

Me a!m smartz, me a,m n0t stup!d

And, nice mech. Looks like it could transform into something to me, like an artillery cannon or a tank, but that's just me

quick update:
completed the connection between lower and upper body,
completed the arm
completed the hand
added detail on lower body
gave him a larger pair of shoes

+++http://www.geocities.com/bettlerfront/i ... cke/04.jpg

<edit>wrong adress replaced my correct adress</edit>

Might want to add a heel type projection from the back, maybe on a joint so its flexible. Just my opinion though.

ooopss, i posted the wrong adress for the update. the correct one is:


+++http://www.geocities.com/bettlerfront/i ... cke/04.jpg

Ok, now we're talking

I didn't want to comment on your other post because I didn't want to nitpick on the same thing (I had a suspicion it hadn't changed a bit, but thought you might have replaced the older one)