Browser ads are becoming honest
Posted: 2004-04-27 01:21am
Look at the URL. I did not manipulate the image in any way.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=44372
Where?DPDarkPrimus wrote:
Look at the URL. I did not manipulate the image in any way.
you have to shoot their eyes out with a click of the mouse. that way you get satisfaction AND you are entered to win a 56" plasma TV.Daltonator wrote:I want to find the people who make those "YOU ARE A WINNER" animated GIFs and pluck their eyes out.
That's awesome.Col. Crackpot wrote:you have to shoot their eyes out with a click of the mouse. that way you get satisfaction AND you are entered to win a 56" plasma TV.Daltonator wrote:I want to find the people who make those "YOU ARE A WINNER" animated GIFs and pluck their eyes out.
It's me showing I didn't edit it.Comosicus wrote:I don't get the URL thing
Indeed.They are annoying as hell.Daltonator wrote:I want to find the people who make those "YOU ARE A WINNER" animated GIFs and pluck their eyes out.
If someone could get an epileptic seizure from something like in the OP, then they must have the most severe case of epilepsy I've ever heard of.Oni Koneko Damien wrote:I wonder if anyone's considered bringing a lawsuit against these people for creating conditions that could directly cause an epileptic seizure, without warning people of those conditions before hand.
I mean, I'm against frivolous lawsuits as a whole, but the epilepsy ones seem to have a track record of success, and the brightly flashing ads are just begging for it. In this case, I'd consider it two wrongs making a right.
-Damien
I think he was talking about those "YOU ARE A WINNER!" ones. The ones with the whole background flashing. God, I hate 'em.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:If someone could get an epileptic seizure from something like in the OP, then they must have the most severe case of epilepsy I've ever heard of.Oni Koneko Damien wrote:I wonder if anyone's considered bringing a lawsuit against these people for creating conditions that could directly cause an epileptic seizure, without warning people of those conditions before hand.
I mean, I'm against frivolous lawsuits as a whole, but the epilepsy ones seem to have a track record of success, and the brightly flashing ads are just begging for it. In this case, I'd consider it two wrongs making a right.
-Damien
Indeed.Montcalm wrote:Funny "Warning are you stupid" "Click here to find out"
Specifically designed to get your attention.RogueIce wrote:I think he was talking about those "YOU ARE A WINNER!" ones. The ones with the whole background flashing. God, I hate 'em.Spanky The Dolphin wrote:If someone could get an epileptic seizure from something like in the OP, then they must have the most severe case of epilepsy I've ever heard of.Oni Koneko Damien wrote:I wonder if anyone's considered bringing a lawsuit against these people for creating conditions that could directly cause an epileptic seizure, without warning people of those conditions before hand.
I mean, I'm against frivolous lawsuits as a whole, but the epilepsy ones seem to have a track record of success, and the brightly flashing ads are just begging for it. In this case, I'd consider it two wrongs making a right.
-Damien
Excellent point. I'd like to know what the per capita OCD rates are from the last century up to present, because I get a sneaking suspicion that OCD rates are increasing...Admiral Valdemar wrote:It seems a fair few people in the US at least are forever cast into the pits of doom thanks to clever viruses using "Open me" as their titles in e-mails.
http://www.macdailynews.com/comments.php?id=P2599_0_1_0
Who needs annoying banners?