Page 1 of 1
Sangria Photo Gallery
Posted: 2004-11-25 05:56am
by Lord Poe
Peeps;
I updated the Sangria band's photo gallery on their website. However, the band's leader says the main picture is "sitting on" the smaller ones in each gallery. The dude isn't very web-literate, and I had to explain to him that there are more pictures to see if he'd just scroll sideways to see them all!
I checked the galleries on IE and Mozilla, and they look fine to me. Can y'all take alook, and see how the galleries look to you?
http://www.sangriaband.net/gallery.html
Posted: 2004-11-25 10:28am
by Tsyroc
It looks okay to me. I'm using Netscape 7.2 (Mozilla) and the only thing that I could see come close to what the guy describes was in the Halloween gallery.
Basically when all the thumbnails load some parts of the lower frame are obscured. Obviously you can see everything if you use the scroll bar, or you can drag the top of the bottom frame up and even things out a little so everything is showing and nothing is overlapping at all.
Original Load
Adjusted Frame
Can you set that part of the bottom frame a little higher? That might be what he was talking about with the overlapping thing.
Hope that helps.
Posted: 2004-11-25 10:52am
by Lord Poe
Tsyroc wrote:Can you set that part of the bottom frame a little higher? That might be what he was talking about with the overlapping thing.
I'll give it a shot. Thanks for checking it out!
Posted: 2004-11-25 02:44pm
by Brother-Captain Gaius
There's a ton of empty space that looks a bit silly running at 1280x1024.
Posted: 2004-11-25 03:28pm
by salm
sideway scrolling sucks. people are not used to it.
Posted: 2004-11-25 09:23pm
by Tsyroc
While I'm not used to it either I kind of liked the sideways scrolling.
Posted: 2004-11-26 05:28pm
by SPOOFE
Sangria? Sangria you say?
Oh. Wrong kind of sangria. D'oh.
Posted: 2004-11-26 07:25pm
by Frank Hipper
Hmmm....You're looking a bit, ahh, glazed in that pic, SPOOFE.
Posted: 2004-11-27 07:28am
by SPOOFE
I'm often a little bit of everything. In varying doses.
Posted: 2004-11-27 10:32am
by Dalton
What's his resolution, Wayne?
Posted: 2004-11-27 10:58am
by Lord Poe
Dalton wrote:What's his resolution, Wayne?
I'm not sure; I haven't been to his house in quite a while. I'd assume 800x600 though.
Posted: 2004-11-27 12:59pm
by Dalton
Lord Poe wrote:Dalton wrote:What's his resolution, Wayne?
I'm not sure; I haven't been to his house in quite a while. I'd assume 800x600 though.
Depending on his resolution and browser, that might be causing the error.
