Page 1 of 1

Dauntless-class (Trek design)

Posted: 2002-11-15 03:01am
by Crayz9000
This is something I've been working on for a while. I'm not sure if I'm actually going to use it in anything or just leave it in my "Ship Designs - Not Interested" folder.

It's supposed to be a heavier complement to the Sovereign. The saucer and nacelles are the same scale as the Sovereign's, but the drawing was entirely my own.

Image

Posted: 2002-11-15 08:42am
by Kuja
This is NOT meant to be an insult, but....looks like a combo of Voyager and Enterprise.

Posted: 2002-11-15 11:53am
by Cpt_Frank
You design TNG era trek ships in your free time?
I could understand if you'd design TOS style trek ships, but TNG... BAH!
Don't get me wrong, it looks good for a TNG ship, really like something we might see on the show, you've gotten the feel right. (but I still don't like TNG ships... not that you actually give a shit :wink: ).
Anyways, for those who entered this thread with the same expectations like I did, here's another Dauntless:
Image

Posted: 2002-11-15 05:23pm
by Crayz9000
IG-88E wrote:This is NOT meant to be an insult, but....looks like a combo of Voyager and Enterprise.
Well, it was only an idea I had. I did learn how to use Paint Shop Pro's vector graphics capabilities while I was designing it :)

Posted: 2002-11-15 09:31pm
by Grand Admiral Thrawn
WHY is there are a big hole in it?

Posted: 2002-11-15 09:34pm
by Howedar
I would prefer it if the catamarans didn't slant in and merge in the rear.

Posted: 2002-11-15 09:38pm
by Crayz9000
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:WHY is there are a big hole in it?
I should have put some detail on that part. It's supposed to be an interchangeable module (similar to the Nebula's pod). I just couldn't figure out what to stick on it :P

Posted: 2002-11-15 09:43pm
by Grand Admiral Thrawn
Crayz9000 wrote:
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:WHY is there are a big hole in it?
I should have put some detail on that part. It's supposed to be an interchangeable module (similar to the Nebula's pod). I just couldn't figure out what to stick on it :P


Rotating torpedo launchers? A giant gun?

Posted: 2002-11-15 09:47pm
by Kuja
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:
Crayz9000 wrote:
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:WHY is there are a big hole in it?
I should have put some detail on that part. It's supposed to be an interchangeable module (similar to the Nebula's pod). I just couldn't figure out what to stick on it :P


Rotating torpedo launchers? A giant gun?
I like that idea...

Posted: 2002-11-15 09:57pm
by Crayz9000
IG-88E wrote:
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:
Crayz9000 wrote: I should have put some detail on that part. It's supposed to be an interchangeable module (similar to the Nebula's pod). I just couldn't figure out what to stick on it :P
Rotating torpedo launchers? A giant gun?
I like that idea...
Heh. One idea for a module was a weapons module, which would include extra phaser strips, turreted quantum torpedo launchers. Another idea was a fuel module, which would turn it into a heavily armed fuel tanker or give it additional operating range.

Posted: 2002-11-15 10:01pm
by Kuja
I like both of those. Even better, it could be easily swapped out, turning
the ship from a refuleing tanker to a heavily-armed destroyer on a couple hours.

Heh, that would make attacking convoys pretty dangerous...who to shoot
first? :twisted:

Posted: 2002-11-15 10:24pm
by Crayz9000
IG-88E wrote:I like both of those. Even better, it could be easily swapped out, turning
the ship from a refuleing tanker to a heavily-armed destroyer on a couple hours.
Well, that was the idea in the first place...
Heh, that would make attacking convoys pretty dangerous...who to shoot first? :twisted:
Heh.

Posted: 2002-11-15 10:55pm
by Sea Skimmer
IG-88E wrote:I like both of those. Even better, it could be easily swapped out, turning
the ship from a refuleing tanker to a heavily-armed destroyer on a couple hours.

Heh, that would make attacking convoys pretty dangerous...who to shoot
first? :twisted:
I don't think telling the difference would be that hard.

Posted: 2002-11-15 10:58pm
by Kuja
Well, if the pods looked fairly similar in structure, and if a ship attacked from the wrong angle, they might not be able to tell until it's too late.

Craz, what kind of ship does the Dauntless fight like? Akira? Intrepid? Defiant?

Posted: 2002-11-15 11:22pm
by Crayz9000
IG-88E wrote:Well, if the pods looked fairly similar in structure, and if a ship attacked from the wrong angle, they might not be able to tell until it's too late.

Craz, what kind of ship does the Dauntless fight like? Akira? Intrepid? Defiant?
Well, it's obviously not as maneuverable as any of those ships. It's a little longer
than the Sovereign and about twice as massive. I originally envisioned it as a heavy
cruiser designed in a hurry using many of the Sovereign's components. It should
have entered service near the end of the Dominion War.

Posted: 2002-11-15 11:28pm
by Kuja
So a slower, harder-hitting Soveriegn?

Hmmm. I like that concept. Maybe Stravo could make it a part of the Shadowfleet. :twisted:

Posted: 2002-11-16 01:28am
by Crayz9000
IG-88E wrote:So a slower, harder-hitting Soveriegn?

Hmmm. I like that concept. Maybe Stravo could make it a part of the Shadowfleet. :twisted:
Heh. Actually, the reason for its name comes from my own fanfic... I was toying with the idea of including this in the future.

Posted: 2002-11-16 01:29am
by Kuja
Cool.