StarDestroyer.Net BBS

http://www.penny-arcade.com/view.php3?d ... 1-24&res=l

Enjoy.

BWAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Ooooh man, I worry about how accurate that will prove to be.

Hilarious!

It'll cost $200 million, with the same results.

BWHAHAHAHAHAHHA.

What is it about Penny Arcade charachters facial expressions and their judicious use of the word "fucking" that is so hilarous? I just can't put my finger on it, but it works every time.

And to be honest too fucking true.

Though I gotta give Tycho on his editorial...it's sad that an FF film is hard to fuck up but behold, someone has shown us that it can be done in one of the easiest ways possible.

And off to AMP...since it's a comic strip

Just because Daredevil was not great with Ben Awful ,it doesn't mean FF will fail

Montcalm wrote:Just because Daredevil was not great with Ben Awful ,it doesn't mean FF will fail

So did you even try to look at what is known or just adding your two worthless cents?

Daredevil is leagues beyond the shit the FF is turned out to be.

Ghost Rider wrote:

Montcalm wrote:Just because Daredevil was not great with Ben Awful ,it doesn't mean FF will fail

So did you even try to look at what is known or just adding your two worthless cents?

Daredevil is leagues beyond the shit the FF is turned out to be.

Before saying Fantastic Four will suck,one should wait to see it.

I still don't know why they had to have Dr. Doom as the fifth crew member. Would making him ruler of some tiny, fictional European country be controversial or something?

At least the Dr. Doom mask and suit look really good.

I still don't know why they had to have Dr. Doom as the fifth crew member.

Better than retconning him in as Reed Richard's college roommate.

I don't have terribly high hopes for FF, but I'm not convinced it's a flop yet. I'll just have to wait and see.

Montcalm wrote:Before saying Fantastic Four will suck,one should wait to see it.

Or just watch the trailer. That's all the evidence I needed.

Or just watch the trailer. That's all the evidence I needed.

Bad movies can have good trailers, and good movies can have bad trailers.

SPOOFE wrote:

I still don't know why they had to have Dr. Doom as the fifth crew member.

Better than retconning him in as Reed Richard's college roommate.

I don't have terribly high hopes for FF, but I'm not convinced it's a flop yet. I'll just have to wait and see.

No, retconning Doom Reed Richards' college roommate doesn't give him super powers. Doom is a supervillain because he's brilliant, not because of superpowers.

Human Torch: Bum on fire. That's great.

SPOOFE wrote: Bad movies can have good trailers, and good movies can have bad trailers.

True, but I don't know. There's something to this that seems wrong. I'll probably still see it, though I don't have the same faith in it being pulled off well like Marvel's recent boom in the movie industry.

And PA.com manages to make another classic point about modern movies.

HEY GUYS, I'M MR. FANTASTIC! LOOK HOW FUCKING FANTASTIC I AM!

The thing that struck me the most about the trailer was the music during the first half of it. Saying it sounded like it was composed on a casio keyboard would be giving it too much credit...

SPOOFE wrote:

Or just watch the trailer. That's all the evidence I needed.

Bad movies can have good trailers, and good movies can have bad trailers.

Is the LOTR trilogy an exception to the rule, then?

No, retconning Doom Reed Richards' college roommate doesn't give him super powers. Doom is a supervillain because he's brilliant, not because of superpowers.

And Reed is a superhero that can threaten Galactus because he's also brilliant, not because he's stretchy. I'm not seeing your point here.

Is the LOTR trilogy an exception to the rule, then?

What rule? I never said good movies can't have good trailers.

SPOOFE wrote:

No, retconning Doom Reed Richards' college roommate doesn't give him super powers. Doom is a supervillain because he's brilliant, not because of superpowers.

And Reed is a superhero that can threaten Galactus because he's also brilliant, not because he's stretchy. I'm not seeing your point here.

Is the LOTR trilogy an exception to the rule, then?

What rule? I never said good movies can't have good trailers.

Misread that, nevermind.