The Only Imperial Magazine You'll Ever Need
Posted: 2005-03-20 10:23am
Rate it!
It's a bit cheap, but hey.
It's a bit cheap, but hey.
StarDestroyer.Net BBS
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
The Only Imperial Magazine You'll Ever Need
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=64757
Page 1 of 1
Posted: 2005-03-21 07:11am
I'm lookin' at the AT-AT's in that pic...look at the one in the verrrrrry back..towards the left...it's angled as if it walked out from that mountain there...how in the hell did it get in that position? is that where it dropped? I couldn't have gotten OVER that mountain..no way...unless...it did...I know! It must've recalibrated it's phase variance photon emitter arrays, making it LOOK as if it is there but it's actually an image of the one closest to the camera! HA! Man I'm smurt!
Posted: 2005-03-21 09:51am
You'd dare to actually risk the wrath of stardestroyer.net by infecting Star Wars with the technobabble of Star Trek?Chardok wrote:I'm lookin' at the AT-AT's in that pic...look at the one in the verrrrrry back..towards the left...it's angled as if it walked out from that mountain there...how in the hell did it get in that position? is that where it dropped? I couldn't have gotten OVER that mountain..no way...unless...it did...I know! It must've recalibrated it's phase variance photon emitter arrays, making it LOOK as if it is there but it's actually an image of the one closest to the camera! HA! Man I'm smurt!
Is this bravery, or the act of a fool?
Posted: 2005-03-21 09:57am
Who is the more foolish? the fool or the fool who asks the fool if he is a fool?Robert Walper wrote:You'd dare to actually risk the wrath of stardestroyer.net by infecting Star Wars with the technobabble of Star Trek?
Is this bravery, or the act of a fool?
Posted: 2005-03-21 09:58am
You're not fooling anyone.Chardok wrote:Who is the more foolish? the fool or the fool who asks the fool if he is a fool?Robert Walper wrote:You'd dare to actually risk the wrath of stardestroyer.net by infecting Star Wars with the technobabble of Star Trek?
Is this bravery, or the act of a fool?
Posted: 2005-03-21 01:49pm
Knock it off with the spam.
Posted: 2005-03-21 11:07pm
Coolness. 
Posted: 2005-03-21 11:16pm
That's pretty cool.
Posted: 2005-03-22 12:52am
Don't you mean stop this foolishness?RedImperator wrote:Knock it off with the spam.
Posted: 2005-03-22 02:13am
Yes, yes he did, and so did I.Zed Snardbody wrote:Don't you mean stop this foolishness?RedImperator wrote:Knock it off with the spam.
In regards to the OP, I like the idea but not a big fan of the execution as it is.
Posted: 2005-03-22 04:21pm
Well, if he deliberatedly tried to make thing look retarded, he wouldn't have done better.Dalton wrote:Yes, yes he did, and so did I.Zed Snardbody wrote:Don't you mean stop this foolishness?RedImperator wrote:Knock it off with the spam.
In regards to the OP, I like the idea but not a big fan of the execution as it is.
Posted: 2005-03-22 05:42pm
Agreed, but some more constructive criticism:kheegan wrote:Well, if he deliberatedly tried to make thing look retarded, he wouldn't have done better.
-Bad typefaces. The thin lines make it harder to read headlines. Compare to some real Time covers to find a better one.
-One photo should take the majority of the cover (as in, more than 50% of total surface area, not one that's sort of larger). Most news-magazine covers have only one large image, and minor listings of other contents.
-Generally, compare to professionally made magazines for improvement.