StarDestroyer.Net BBS

I mentioned this in the vent thread, but I thought it bore relevance here. (If it's more at home in PSW, please relocate it.)

The AMT/Ertl Shuttle Tydirium kit seems to be based on the set design from RotJ (at least Saxton seems to agree). I wonder if it can't be modified to better match the flight miniature. I'm thinking about building a new dorsal fin to match the shape and proportions of the miniature, and I'm seriously considering adjusting the droop angle of the cockpit module.

Should I go ahead with either or both of these modifications? What other changes should be made? Does anyone believe the Lambda class possesses a v/g cockpit module, or is it purely a gaffe between the set and mini?

For reference, here's one built up with lights (and a huge Rebel insignia):

http://www.starshipmodeler.org/gallery8/nm_rshuttle.htm

In addition, what's the consensus on dimensions? Saxton seems to lean towards the 80'4" height for docking mode.

I'd follow Saxton's musings religiously, myself.

I'm sure that the differences between the set and the model are SFX gaffes, rather than a variable geometry cockpit, too.

That will be a big project, enjoy yourself.

I agree with the v/g bit. After thinking about it, it doesn't make a lick of sense to equip a spacecraft that has shields to improve aerodynamic performance with a system for about the same reason the Concorde uses it.

As for the kit, it's probably going to be a compromise. New fin, but unless I can correct the nose's angle, it'll have to stay where it is. Plus, the cockpit needs a lot of work.

Firefox wrote:I agree with the v/g bit. After thinking about it, it doesn't make a lick of sense to equip a spacecraft that has shields to improve aerodynamic performance with a system for about the same reason the Concorde uses it.

If it's a shuttle, it won't constantly have its shields up. So it could very well be for aerodynamic purposes.

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:If it's a shuttle, it won't constantly have its shields up. So it could very well be for aerodynamic purposes.

Not if the shuttle has a poor aerodynamic shape. Do you think those slabs for wings and dorsal fin would pass as aerofoils? Unless it's at low subsonic, it'd need shields to augment its atmospheric performance.

Hmm...one wonders why they make wings at all then if it depends upon shields to alter its aerodynamics.

IRG CommandoJoe wrote:Hmm...one wonders why they make wings at all then if it depends upon shields to alter its aerodynamics.

Heat dissipation, same reason TIE series fighters have such huge radiator panels.