Book collection challenge [56k friendly]

The Grim Squeaker · Post by **The Grim Squeaker** » 2006-01-25 09:52am

Ace Pace · Post by **Ace Pace** » 2006-01-25 10:01am

Holy...agnostic....shit.

Though I'm pretty sure you just decleared war on the rest of the book hounds here.

Thats a fuckload of sweet books.

Faram · Post by **Faram** » 2006-01-25 10:35am

Well good for you, but have you read them all?

Ace Pace · Post by **Ace Pace** » 2006-01-25 10:45am

Faram wrote:Well good for you, but have you read them all?

I'm guessing that yes

In what other ways would nerdy teens waste their time?

Elheru Aran · Post by **Elheru Aran** » 2006-01-25 10:51am

A bunch of those pics are repeats...

The Grim Squeaker · Post by **The Grim Squeaker** » 2006-01-25 01:49pm

Faram wrote:Well good for you, but have you read them all?

Multiple Times, I read my favourites (A few dozen] over 6-8 times each, but there isn't one that I have'nt read at least once or twice (Usually 3 or more times if it's a good book).

A bunch of those pics are repeats...

Which? Some are of the same long bookshelf only of different parts of it.

I'll upload a 640x480 inlined version [Of all the pictures] tommorow once I'm done editing and re-sizing it, as long as it isn't a breach of bandwidth, ok?

Ace Pace · Post by **Ace Pace** » 2006-01-25 01:52pm

DEATH wrote: Which? Some are of the same long bookshelf only of different parts of it.

I'll upload a 640x480 inlined version [Of all the pictures] tommorow once I'm done editing and re-sizing it, as long as it isn't a breach of bandwidth, ok?

No, its not.

Faqa · Post by **Faqa** » 2006-01-25 02:23pm

*dies*

I'd attempt to at least try for respectable second here, if it weren't for my lack of digital camera-ness.

But that collection's even more impressive than it looked initially.....

The Grim Squeaker · Post by **The Grim Squeaker** » 2006-01-25 02:48pm

Ace Pace wrote:
DEATH wrote: Which? Some are of the same long bookshelf only of different parts of it.

I'll upload a 640x480 inlined version [Of all the pictures] tommorow once I'm done editing and re-sizing it, as long as it isn't a breach of bandwidth, ok?
No, its not.

hmmm, thought you said it was? Ah well, jsut clink on the links, I reccomend the firefox extension LINKY for opening multiple links/tabs/pictures at once, in case nobody feels like slogging through each link.

But that collection's even more impressive than it looked initially.....

You should have seen it before my donations and clean up, the table was 4-5 books thick and a sea of pages, as were the bookshelves and 2-3 stacks of 12+ books scattered over the floor

.

I'd attempt to at least try for respectable second here,

use a phone, if it makes you feel better my grandfather's collection is more than 4-5 times as large as this

, so you might edge in for second if you exclude anyone related to the 3d degree from me.
[Not counting an old friend of mine from England with almost 2/3or more as many books, although estimates are hard with him due to his books being shared among the whole family.] We have a lot more books in the house apart from mine after all

Elheru Aran · Post by **Elheru Aran** » 2006-01-25 05:19pm

DEATH wrote:
A bunch of those pics are repeats...
Which? Some are of the same long bookshelf only of different parts of it.

I'll upload a 640x480 inlined version [Of all the pictures] tommorow once I'm done editing and re-sizing it, as long as it isn't a breach of bandwidth, ok?

No, a bunch of 'em are just the same pics, or at least that's how they showed up on my end.

The Grim Squeaker · Post by **The Grim Squeaker** » 2006-01-26 02:32am

No, a bunch of 'em are just the same pics, or at least that's how they showed up on my end.

Odd, I'll re-upload 64-x480 versions once I get back from my test today, which ones are repeats?