Page 1 of 1

Hip-hop: 50 cents short of a dollar

Posted: 2006-05-14 12:42pm
by Joe
link
IN THE NORMAL course of affairs, rap doesn’t particularly impinge on my life. I did my share of listening to Grandmaster Flash and Public Enemy a couple of decades ago, and that was enough, thank you. If my two teenaged sons adore Kanye West, well, I can leave them to it, safe in the knowledge that I spent the first dozen years of their lives inoculating them with Ray Charles records. That should enable them to work out that I Gotta Woman is a better record than Gold Digger, but if not, well, there’s only so much a parent can do.

Sometimes, however, there’s no avoiding the hip-hop home-boys. Rap is the all-purpose Muzak of modern life, as ubiquitous as the rattle of pneumatic drills on the North Circular. There I was the other day, for example, listening to Timeless, the new record by that Sixties samba hero Sergio Mendes, when the Black Eyed Peas suddenly crashed into the studio and set about mutilating (yes, there’s no other word) that quintessential Brazilian anthem Mas Que Nada.

A grisly experience, and almost as grim as Black Eyed rapper will.i.am’s performance on the next track, That Heat, which included the deathless line “Brazilian beauties with booties that wobble . . .” After I had picked my jaw from the floor, I realised that will.i.am had done us all a great favour by reminding us how huge a gulf separates rap from the best pop music.

We’re not supposed to say things like this, obviously. Admitting to disliking hip-hop is, we are told, a sure sign that you have entered middle age. But it’s not necessarily so, is it? I thought rap had run out of steam when I was 23, yet I never grow tired of discovering new musicians from the realm of world music or — less often, admittedly — jazz. I love Motown and blues too. After journeying through those soundscapes, listening to the latest rap hit is like being invited for a five-course dinner at the local Burger King.

All the same, you court trouble by professing that rap is depressingly one-dimensional. As Slate, the online magazine, reported this week, the pop singer-songwriter Stephin Merritt has been accused of racism for saying that, although he liked the early days of rap, he is bored by the modern-day version.

No one ever accuses me of being anti-Christian when I say I’m allergic to Cliff Richard. But rap is, well, different. Pop critics, who are — need I remind you? — overwhelmingly white and middle-class, and guilt-ridden to boot, employ a curious double standard here. It’s absolutely OK to ridicule the audience for country music — “white trash” have always been fair game. No one would ever try the same with Dr Dre’s posse — and not just because of the risk of flying bullets.

Of course, it’s worth recalling that there was a time when blues music was dismissed as worthless and socially unacceptable by many middle-class black Americans. Eager to be accepted by the white world, they regarded the shouters and big fat mammas as a coarse and painful reminder of hard times. Today, a Robert Johnson CD is the last word in chic, and we chortle over Bessie Smith’s gentle double entendres about “keyholes” and “jelly roll”. Maybe a similar process will one day carry 50 Cent into the pantheon, though I doubt it.

Rap sceptics should take comfort from the fact that there are black American intellectuals who are just as irritated by the adolescent swagger. The commentator Stanley Crouch never misses an opportunity to lay into gangsta rappers. “They are at the bottom of the evolutionary scale,” was one of his politer comments. John McWhorter, the outspoken young fellow of the Manhattan Institute, ridicules hip-hop revolutionaries in his new book Winning the Race: Beyond the Crisis in Black America.

As it happens, McWhorter doesn’t dislike all the records. What irritates him beyond belief is the notion — universal among music journalists and the trendier breed of academic — that the radical voice-of-the-streets slogans are anything other than a lucrative form of theatre. For McWhorter, it is all just another symptom of what he calls “therapeutic alienation”: too many black people, he argues, embrace alienation as a way of “hiding from facing the real world as self- realising individuals”.

The ultimate irony is that the biggest market for in-your-face rap is not the dispossessed ghetto youth. The real money is made in the white suburbs, where teens who live in the most cosseted environment in the history of mankind are able to live out fantasies of being the roughest, toughest guy in the ’hood. As the cultural critic Martha Bayles has observed, the music has supplanted heavy metal as the soundtrack of a young man’s rite of passage.

Meanwhile, the packaging and the slick videos exploit racial stereotypes that were all the rage in the Jim Crow era. The minstrel show is back, and nobody seems to have noticed.

Posted: 2006-05-14 12:47pm
by Darth Wong
What about the clothes? Hip-hop has got to be the most retarded clothing fashion in living memory, potentially rivaled (but certainly not equaled) only by bell-bottom pants.

I actually saw a young man running to catch a bus a while ago, and he was pulling up his pants to run, like a fucking Victorian-era damsel hiking up her oversized skirt so she can move.

Posted: 2006-05-14 01:29pm
by RedImperator
It's a little disingenuous to use the Black Eyes Peas as proof rap as a genre is inferior pop music. Everybody knows the Black Eyes Peas are garbage. I could dismiss all of rock on the basis of Hoobastank by that same logic. I'm not addressing the other points, but going after it aesthetically with just them as your evidence is pretty weak.

Posted: 2006-05-14 11:22pm
by Darth Wong
It's pretty hard to argue aesthetics as if it were an objective quantity. But it is really fucking tiresome how people who hate hip-hop are so often tarred as racists or closet racists. That element of the article is right on the money, although it's also a bleedingly obvious point to make. The fact that I despise everything about the hip-hop gangsta bling-bling baggy-pants hood culture does not mean I have a problem with blacks. It means I have a problem with posturing morons.

Posted: 2006-05-15 01:35am
by Plekhanov
The authors attacks on bling/gansta culture may well be valid but his attack on rap music is deeply falicious it’s as if I said 'Feeder are shit therefore Rock is shit' which is obviously absurd. Feeder are shit that doesn’t stop the Pixies being fantastic just as the Blackeye Pees being crap doesn’t stop DangerDoom from being ace.
a blinkered idiot wrote:I love Motown and blues too. After journeying through those soundscapes, listening to the latest rap hit is like being invited for a five-course dinner at the local Burger King.
I really hate this kind of argument, of course the guys favourite motown and blues sound better to him than ‘the latest rap hit’, it’ll sound better than the latest hit in any genre because most music is shit and quickly forgotten. Mr Davis undoubtedly did a great deal of filtering out the crap before settling on his favoured motown & blues ‘soundscapes’ and it’s ridiculous to compare that to unfiltered contemporary stuff.

In 30 years time when old rap buffs compare their favourite hip-hop soundscapes to the latest hit in whatever’s dominant then the new stuff will come off unfavourably that won’t mean that the news stuff is shit but that conservative old people tend not to like new musical genres and that over hyped shit is soon forgotten whilst good music endures, as will the best hip-hop.

Posted: 2006-05-16 12:19pm
by Kenny_10_Bellys
I wouldn't consider it an out and out attack, hes just stating his preference and making observations and not writing a treatise on Rap and it's place in world music history. When he makes the analogy between Rap and food it's to show that he considers most Rap to be very samey and one-dimensional, not that Blues and Motown are the 'be all and end all' of music.

If you filter all blues and motown you'll probably still come up with a great deal of amazing tracks, but if you run rap through the same filter then there's a good chance it's not going to be anywhere near as large a catch. We should face up to the fact that rap is not the most musically inventive of genres, indeed most of the best rappers haven't been near an instrument in their lives, and nor does it have the extensive history of other musical forms.

Personally I would class the majority of Rap as agressive or adolescent poetry, usually set to someone else's music and usually sounding largely the same as the last lot you heard. Apart from perhaps Country music I think you'd be hard pressed to find a style of music that has less significance and originality in the majority of it's performers. That's just my opinion of course, I could be wrong.

Posted: 2006-05-16 01:05pm
by Edi
I generally despise rap, but I won't deny there are some actually good songs every now and then. Then again, that's nothing more than a personal opinion. It's interesting how quite a few Finnish rap songs have been pretty good and interesting, but that might be due to the difficulty of fitting the language to the music style. The lyrics have been rather different from the stereotypical crap that the majority of American rap songs seem to be about. The ones I've heard anyway.

Not that I like blues or jazz either, but still better than rap.

Edi

Posted: 2006-05-16 06:38pm
by Vendetta
The most interesting criticisms I've heard of rap recently are from its founding fathers. The people who formed the original hip hop scene on the streets, especially of New York.

To paraphrase the argument, because it was a long article in friday's Indy, Rap started to become devalued into the corporate bottom-feeding commercial shit it is today when the rappers started to be convinced that they could do without the rest of the hip hop scene. When they started to get the idea that their rap lyrics were somehow more important than the DJ behind them, or the breakers, or even the graffitti artists or the people along for the party, the egos started to take over, and what had been a scene which was inclusive and unified communities turned into a divisive force that leads now to something only a little short of gang rivalry, with the violence that entails.

If you go back to the days of Afrika Bambaata and his contemporaries, or even more recent acts (Jurassic 5 spring to mind, though I've not heard anything new from them for a decade or more) that have kept it alive, you find the same skills in evidence. These people are better rappers than the people who get on the radio, but they don't have the attitude that it (or their success) makes them better.

Posted: 2006-05-16 11:46pm
by LeftWingExtremist
I personally don't see how someone could wear tracksuits as a fashion item. I personally hate the hip hop "gangsta" culture.

Posted: 2006-05-16 11:51pm
by Plekhanov
Kenny_10_Bellys wrote:I wouldn't consider it an out and out attack, hes just stating his preference and making observations and not writing a treatise on Rap and it's place in world music history. When he makes the analogy between Rap and food it's to show that he considers most Rap to be very samey and one-dimensional, not that Blues and Motown are the 'be all and end all' of music.

If you filter all blues and motown you'll probably still come up with a great deal of amazing tracks, but if you run rap through the same filter then there's a good chance it's not going to be anywhere near as large a catch.
And you know this how? How much rap have you actually listened to?
We should face up to the fact that rap is not the most musically inventive of genres,
Bullshit, rap is one of the most innovative and diverse forms of popular music there is today.
indeed most of the best rappers haven't been near an instrument in their lives,
So what? Many lead singers in other genres don’t play anything does that mean their music’s shit?
and nor does it have the extensive history of other musical forms.
Hip-hop can only trace it’s explicit origins to 1970s so what?
Personally I would class the majority of Rap as agressive or adolescent poetry, usually set to someone else's music and usually sounding largely the same as the last lot you heard.
Which just goes to see how little Rap you’ve ever actually listened to.
Apart from perhaps Country music I think you'd be hard pressed to find a style of music that has less significance and originality in the majority of it's performers. That's just my opinion of course, I could be wrong.
You most certainly are.
Vendetta wrote:The most interesting criticisms I've heard of rap recently are from its founding fathers. The people who formed the original hip hop scene on the streets, especially of New York.

To paraphrase the argument, because it was a long article in friday's Indy, Rap started to become devalued into the corporate bottom-feeding commercial shit it is today when the rappers started to be convinced that they could do without the rest of the hip hop scene. When they started to get the idea that their rap lyrics were somehow more important than the DJ behind them, or the breakers, or even the graffitti artists or the people along for the party, the egos started to take over, and what had been a scene which was inclusive and unified communities turned into a divisive force that leads now to something only a little short of gang rivalry, with the violence that entails.
I’d pretty much agree with all of that, mainstream highly commercial rap with a few honourable exceptions is shit and produces little music of any value and the whole culture that goes on along with it is bloody awful, of course you can say pretty much the same thing for rock & pop as well.

There’s still a thriving ‘underground’ hip-hop scene going on though which is producing a great deal of really good and interesting stuff.
If you go back to the days of Afrika Bambaata and his contemporaries, or even more recent acts (Jurassic 5 spring to mind, though I've not heard anything new from them for a decade or more) that have kept it alive, you find the same skills in evidence. These people are better rappers than the people who get on the radio, but they don't have the attitude that it (or their success) makes them better.
Jurassic 5’s last album ‘Power in Numbers’ came out in 02 and was pretty good, I think they have a new album coming out in the summer.