Sovereign class, rear torpedo launcher.

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Do we have any evidence that the thing actually is a turret though?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Vympel wrote:Do we have any evidence that the thing actually is a turret though?
http://www.shiporama.org/images/sovereign/1701e-59.jpg

And if you watch Insurrection you will see something similar. Indications are it can traverse at or near 90 degrees to each side.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Is it traveresed in that shot? Looks dead ahead....
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Vympel wrote:Is it traveresed in that shot? Looks dead ahead....
It is aimed dead ahead, but you can see the space to either side. It looks like it can traverse to either side. I used to be skeptic about it being a turret, but when I saw this picture that confirmed it for me. It has to be turreted to a degree.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Vertigo1
Defender of the Night
Posts: 4720
Joined: 2002-08-12 12:47am
Location: Tennessee, USA
Contact:

Post by Vertigo1 »

There was also concept art which had the forward qtorp launcher actually come out of the hull and fire. (ala B5's defense grid) Pity they didn't keep that design. That would've been wicked.
"I once asked Rebecca to sing Happy Birthday to me during sex. That was funny, especially since I timed my thrusts to sync up with the words. And yes, it was my birthday." - Darth Wong

Leader of the SD.Net Gargoyle Clan | Spacebattles Firstone | Twitter
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Vertigo1 wrote:There was also concept art which had the forward qtorp launcher actually come out of the hull and fire. (ala B5's defense grid) Pity they didn't keep that design. That would've been wicked.

I prefer it the way it is- there's no reason to add pointless complexity like weapons that come out of hatches. Sure it would've been cool, but would it have been pragmatic?
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

It would have been funky, but it would not have been in keeping with established Trek design doctrine.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Lord Pounder
Pretty Hate Machine
Posts: 9695
Joined: 2002-11-19 04:40pm
Location: Belfast, unfortunately
Contact:

Post by Lord Pounder »

I bought a model of the Enterprise E just after it came out. There is no rear launcher on it. It seems to me the SFX team are making specs up as they co along.
RIP Yosemite Bear
Gone, Never Forgotten
Post Reply