Janeway and the Caretaker array

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Aaron »

Batman wrote: I know. My point was as Starfleet ALSO has has a lot of what SHOULD be Enlisted jobs maybe their officer rank ladder starts a lot lower.
Yes but there where actual reasons why the Soviet Union did things the way they did, what would be the IU reason for doing this? The only NCO we ever saw in depth in Trek was O'Brien and he clearly wasn't an uneducated dumbass.
There WOULD be if the Starfleet rank structure worked like a modern day military's. It obviously doesn't. Riker refused command of his own ship TWICE while being Number One on the big E yet still DID get one in Nemesis. Normally, when you refuse command, the navy agrees that they won't ever bother you about taking command of a ship EVER.
Yes SF ranks obviously don't work the way ours do, however I still don't see how people aren't getting screwed around if Picard and Kirk's careers are the norm. There's still going to be a large number of officers who never get their own ship, hell Riker only got his because Titan was apparently new construction.

Mind you after the Dominion War there should be plenty of room for advancement. :wink:
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Simon_Jester »

SancheztheWhaler wrote:You misunderstand - my point is not that Bligh was an incompetent who drove his crew to mutiny because he cruelly abused them (historical records show that he was in fact a surprisingly lenient commander compared to some of his counterparts), but rather that you don't promote commanders after debacles such as mutiny, crashing ships on rocks, collisions, or getting lost on the other side of the galaxy. Rather, Bligh was court martialed (and acquitted), and then continued his career. Had he been convicted, he likely would have been imprisoned and his career ended.
What that proves is that you do not promote commanders after a disaster unless their behavior passes inspection. If we could look more closely at the context in which Janeway passed inspection, I'd expect to find a politically motivated board of investigation that wound up dropping most of the charges for one reason or another, to the point where Janeway's career could continue in the same way that Bligh's did, regardless of whether she deserved to have it continue.

Possibilities:
-Janeway has 'interest': she is related to prominent Starfleet officers, or to someone those officers owe a favor.
-Janeway is a media darling on the 24th century Federation's version of the Internet to the point where even a competent Admiralty doesn't want to have to put up with all the crap it would take for refusing to promote her, let alone cashiering her.
-Janeway's after action report is heavily falsified, with the crew collectively agreeing to keep its mouth shut and keep the official record clean because it makes ALL of them look like idiots. There may be scary "no shit" rumors bouncing around the fleet about how hopelessly messed up the entire Delta Quadrant Trek* really was, but nobody admits it for the record.

*"Trek" is, I think, a uniquely appropriate word for what they were doing. Voyager was more legitimately about a "wagon train to the stars" than any other series in the setting, because the ship had to operate much farther from base and with a much more distant destination.
Starglider wrote:Sisko planned and personally led the invasion of Cardassian space, not to mention the operation to retake the station, while at the rank of captain. How that works with the chain of command I don't know, but the Federation doesn't seem to be as strict about matching command level to rank (and vice versa) as real world militaries. Regardless, I can only assume that it would've been difficult to replace Sisko due to the Bajorans bitching about losing their Emissary, but that Federation internal politics blocked a Janeway-style speed promotion to the admiralty.
Does Starfleet have a rank of "Commodore"? If not, they may use a system similar to the Napoleonic British one, in which a 'commodore' is a captain who has been given command of a squadron without being promoted to permanent flag rank. Commodore was a title, not a rank, and commodores often commanded small squadrons or naval bases. This allowed the Admiralty to create a clear chain of command ("Captain Commodore Aubrey is in charge") without having to increase the already badly inflated population of admirals.

Thus, faced with a political dilemma, Starfleet may have made Sisko commodore in command of the invasion of Cardassian space as the best available option. Or, if they use an American-like system, breveted him to commodore without it drawing much (if any) attention on-screen.
Batman wrote:Janeway knew everything about every job on her ship EXCEPT HERS. A Captain doesn't NEED to know those jobs. That's what the people DOING those jobs are there for.
"Promoted to her level of incompetence," then? Maybe she did a pretty good job at lower rank, then fell apart when dropped in a command chair and put in a situation far beyond the bounds of normal Starfleet experience...
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Skylon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1657
Joined: 2005-01-12 04:55pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Skylon »

Simon_Jester wrote:Does Starfleet have a rank of "Commodore"? If not, they may use a system similar to the Napoleonic British one, in which a 'commodore' is a captain who has been given command of a squadron without being promoted to permanent flag rank. Commodore was a title, not a rank, and commodores often commanded small squadrons or naval bases. This allowed the Admiralty to create a clear chain of command ("Captain Commodore Aubrey is in charge") without having to increase the already badly inflated population of admirals.

It did during TOS. In fact during TOS I think we run into more Commodores than Admirals.

It looks like the rank is gone by TNG era.
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge

"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)

"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Stofsk »

Commodores were depicted as being 'Senior Captains'. Commodores are seen in command of Starbases, like Commodore Stone and Mendez in "Court Martial" and "The Menagerie" two-parter, and in command of squadrons like Commodore Bob Wesley in "The Ultimate Computer". Matt Decker was also a Commodore, and in command of the Constellation, which suggests it is a Senior Captain role as opposed to a flag rank - which makes far more sense than in TNG, where there is no intermediate step between Captain and Admiral, and Starfleet seemed to have a huge number of Admirals, and some of them in command of Starbases for some reason.
Image
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by tim31 »

They also had the rank of Fleet Captain in TOS; Chris Pike and Garth of Izar held this rank, although it may be an honorific tacked on to the existing rank of Captain.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Ted C »

tim31 wrote:They also had the rank of Fleet Captain in TOS; Chris Pike and Garth of Izar held this rank, although it may be an honorific tacked on to the existing rank of Captain.
Possibly. IIRC, the title Commodore serves that purpose in at least some real navies, distinguishing a captain in command of a fleet from other captains in the fleet. In Starfleet, however, Commodore appears to be an actual rank between Captain and Admiral.

Commodore Decker, commanding the Constellation in "The Doomsday Machine", was in command of a single ship, not a fleet or squadron.

The Commodore in "The Deadly Years" wasn't even in command of a ship, let alone a fleet, until he took command of the Enterprise when he deemed Kirk unfit due to the effects of premature aging.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Skylon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1657
Joined: 2005-01-12 04:55pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Skylon »

Ted C wrote:
tim31 wrote:They also had the rank of Fleet Captain in TOS; Chris Pike and Garth of Izar held this rank, although it may be an honorific tacked on to the existing rank of Captain.
Possibly. IIRC, the title Commodore serves that purpose in at least some real navies, distinguishing a captain in command of a fleet from other captains in the fleet. In Starfleet, however, Commodore appears to be an actual rank between Captain and Admiral.

Commodore Decker, commanding the Constellation in "The Doomsday Machine", was in command of a single ship, not a fleet or squadron.
Given how spread out Starfleet seemed during TOS, maybe Decker's squadron was covering a wide area, but still answerable to him?
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge

"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)

"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
User avatar
Ted C
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4486
Joined: 2002-07-07 11:00am
Location: Nashville, TN
Contact:

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Ted C »

Skylon wrote:
Ted C wrote:Commodore Decker, commanding the Constellation in "The Doomsday Machine", was in command of a single ship, not a fleet or squadron.
Given how spread out Starfleet seemed during TOS, maybe Decker's squadron was covering a wide area, but still answerable to him?
Kirk obviously wasn't in Decker's chain of command, but the Enterprise was still the first ship to arrive on the scene after the Constellation. That doesn't make sense if there were other Federation starship's under Decker's command in the area. The other ships in his squadron should have been able to arrive on the scene before the Enterprise. There's also no record of Decker issuing orders to other ships in his log from the Constellation.
"This is supposed to be a happy occasion... Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who."
-- The King of Swamp Castle, Monty Python and the Holy Grail

"Nothing of consequence happened today. " -- Diary of King George III, July 4, 1776

"This is not bad; this is a conspiracy to remove happiness from existence. It seeks to wrap its hedgehog hand around the still beating heart of the personification of good and squeeze until it is stilled."
-- Chuck Sonnenburg on Voyager's "Elogium"
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Stofsk »

tim31 wrote:They also had the rank of Fleet Captain in TOS; Chris Pike and Garth of Izar held this rank, although it may be an honorific tacked on to the existing rank of Captain.
I think it's more of an honorific. Think of who are the only two starfleet officers who held that rank: Chris Pike, who was crippled due to a terrible accident, and SFC didn't have the heart to kick him out, so they 'promoted' him to 'Fleet Captain' (which might be short for Starfleet Captain, and is more of an honoury title than anything else) and put him on permanent disability exemption.

Garth was a hero due to IIRC the Battle of Axanar, and then went crazy due to an encounter with the shapeshifting aliens. He gave an illegal order that was presumably uncharacteristic of him, which led to him being put in a facility. Again, possible same situation as Pike, SFC didn't have the heart to fire so important a war hero (according to Kirk, Axanar was somehow vital in keeping the Federation together) so 'promoted' him and hoped one day he might be cured.

That's my take on it.
Ted C wrote:
tim31 wrote:They also had the rank of Fleet Captain in TOS; Chris Pike and Garth of Izar held this rank, although it may be an honorific tacked on to the existing rank of Captain.
Possibly. IIRC, the title Commodore serves that purpose in at least some real navies, distinguishing a captain in command of a fleet from other captains in the fleet. In Starfleet, however, Commodore appears to be an actual rank between Captain and Admiral.

Commodore Decker, commanding the Constellation in "The Doomsday Machine", was in command of a single ship, not a fleet or squadron.

The Commodore in "The Deadly Years" wasn't even in command of a ship, let alone a fleet, until he took command of the Enterprise when he deemed Kirk unfit due to the effects of premature aging.
Commodore Decker may have been in command of a squadron that wasn't active except for Constellation. Or the ships in the squadron were undergoing refit or whatever. He doesn't stop being a Commodore however.

The Commodore in "The Deadly Years" was a Starbase Commodore, he was hitching a ride on the Enterprise en route to a particular Starbase, so it's not out of the ordinary for him to not be a Line Captain (like Kirk) or squadron leader like say, Commodore Wesley (and probably Commodore Decker). Commodores being starbase administrators is a precedent throughout the series (Starbases in TOS are universally commanded by Commodores)
Image
User avatar
Skylon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1657
Joined: 2005-01-12 04:55pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Skylon »

Stofsk wrote:
tim31 wrote:They also had the rank of Fleet Captain in TOS; Chris Pike and Garth of Izar held this rank, although it may be an honorific tacked on to the existing rank of Captain.
I think it's more of an honorific. Think of who are the only two starfleet officers who held that rank: Chris Pike, who was crippled due to a terrible accident, and SFC didn't have the heart to kick him out, so they 'promoted' him to 'Fleet Captain' (which might be short for Starfleet Captain, and is more of an honoury title than anything else) and put him on permanent disability exemption.
Pike got the promotion to Fleet Captain when he relinquished command of the Enterprise (Kirk says he met him when he was promoted). That was before the accident that crippled him. Memory Alpha also has a few tidbits about the rank, noting that Pike was referred to as "Captain" and the door to his room at Starbase 11 said "Captain Christopher Pike" suggesting it is mostly an honorific rank.
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge

"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)

"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
User avatar
DaveJB
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1917
Joined: 2003-10-06 05:37pm
Location: Leeds, UK

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by DaveJB »

Although the TOS commodores outranked the captains, they didn't seem to hold any actual authority over them (unless they were in a squad under their command, as with Wesley) - Decker was only able to take command of the Enterprise because Kirk was still trapped on the Constellation, and when Kirk contracted that ageing disease, Stocker had to have him removed through a competency hearing rather than just summarily removing him from command.
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Simon_Jester »

DaveJB wrote:Although the TOS commodores outranked the captains, they didn't seem to hold any actual authority over them (unless they were in a squad under their command, as with Wesley) - Decker was only able to take command of the Enterprise because Kirk was still trapped on the Constellation, and when Kirk contracted that ageing disease, Stocker had to have him removed through a competency hearing rather than just summarily removing him from command.
That's consistent with something more like a British-style system, where a captain who is appointed commodore is in charge of joint planning but doesn't necessarily have the kind of superiority that would let him crack down hard on a single captain, the way an admiral presumably could.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by tim31 »

I Heinlein's book-about-a-bug-war-whose-name-we-don't-mention-for-fear-of-starting-a-facism-debate, there is a reference to a hypothetical situation in which a Navy officer with the rank of Captain comes aboard a ship. Even if the skipper is only a Lieutenant, the visiting OF-5 is referred to as Commodore.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Big Orange »

Janeway and her crew getting trapped, partially because of her actions in destorying the Array, was a plot contrivance brought about by rushed and bad story editing. We could've had a reasonable explanation that once the Caretaker died, the Array's controls had frazzled out or were even just completely incomprehensible to baseline humanoids, and there was no way in hell Janeway's crew could have the luxury to operate the Array's systems in time before dozens of heavily armed Kazon ships landed on top of them. Seven of Nine's paranoid fantasies about Janeway's supposed true intentions in "The Voyager Conspiracy" made more sense...
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
Kythnos
Youngling
Posts: 143
Joined: 2008-12-05 10:19pm

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Kythnos »

Big Orange wrote:Janeway and her crew getting trapped, partially because of her actions in destorying the Array, was a plot contrivance brought about by rushed and bad story editing. We could've had a reasonable explanation that once the Caretaker died, the Array's controls had frazzled out or were even just completely incomprehensible to baseline humanoids, and there was no way in hell Janeway's crew could have the luxury to operate the Array's systems in time before dozens of heavily armed Kazon ships landed on top of them. Seven of Nine's paranoid fantasies about Janeway's supposed true intentions in "The Voyager Conspiracy" made more sense...
When I first saw that episode I thought that the writers where going to have the Caretaker power the array, therefore when he dies they are stuck. Of course that would negate the all powerful "technobabble".
There's a great difference between potential and developed power. The one is clearly visible and can be awe-inspiring. The other may take a demigod to recognize.
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Patrick Degan »

The thing of it is that there was always the option of an old SF standby to resolve this plot problem: the Array and the Caretaker being linked together and it's systems dependent upon the active intelligence of the Caretaker to sustain them in their proper function. When the Caretaker dies, the Array becomes increasingly unstable and of course the system is far too complex to gain any sort of understanding of how it works before the thing self-detonates and certainly not before Kazon reinforcements arrive in the star system. This would have simplified the plot mechanics quite nicely and would have resulted in the Voyager crew becoming trapped by a cause other than Janeway's stupidity.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Stofsk »

When you think about it, it's pretty ridiculous for a plucky Starfleet crew to be able to figure out how to use the Whatever device under such short notice when they have no understanding of the science or technology that allows it to work in the first place (otherwise they'd have their own Whatever devices as well, which they don't).
Image
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Perhaps, but they've been doing that since TOS all the way through to Enterprise, and I don't think it was ever going to stop :)
Image
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Stofsk »

Chris OFarrell wrote:Perhaps, but they've been doing that since TOS all the way through to Enterprise, and I don't think it was ever going to stop :)
I don't disagree with that. The difference is one of attitude, in TOS they at least admitted they didn't know everything and were out there trying to find out new things, while in Voyager Tuvok's like "Give me a couple hours and I can make this thing my bitch." It's displayed as an afterthought.
Image
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Janeway and the Caretaker array

Post by Simon_Jester »

Stofsk wrote:When you think about it, it's pretty ridiculous for a plucky Starfleet crew to be able to figure out how to use the Whatever device under such short notice when they have no understanding of the science or technology that allows it to work in the first place (otherwise they'd have their own Whatever devices as well, which they don't).
True, although it may depend on context. "Advanced technology" need not mean "difficult to use."

We often design products of advanced technology so that they will be easy to use for people who lack the time, the inclination, or the ability to learn how they work. A guy from ancient Greece would probably view a car or a computer as a magic box, there's no obvious reason he couldn't learn to use it if he got over any flashes of superstitious dread.

Maybe the Array has a deceptively simple user interface, something as easy as "move cursor to point HERE, press button, move cursor to point THERE, ship gets teleported from A to B." In that case, even a bunch of random sailors fooling around with it to sling rocks around the star system could probably figure it out soon enough.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Post Reply