Why I think Argo had Rear-firing phaser

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Rommel123
Redshirt
Posts: 43
Joined: 2011-02-27 11:17am

Re: Why I think Argo had Rear-firing phaser

Post by Rommel123 »

http://protagonist4hire.blogspot.com/20 ... -week.html

Explain above.

About Argo, it is light recon vehicle, basically designed for "bug in, collect (xy)/do recon/do something else, and then bug out" - type missions, which is exactly type of mission we see it in. It is not assault vehicle, and it is questionable if it was designed as combat vehicle in first place, althought it seems so.
User avatar
PeZook
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13237
Joined: 2002-07-18 06:08pm
Location: Poland

Re: Why I think Argo had Rear-firing phaser

Post by PeZook »

Thing is, a weapon for self-defence is still better placed on top. Why? Because then a guy who's chasing you can't neuter your weapon by simply driving a bit to the side.
Image
JULY 20TH 1969 - The day the entire world was looking up

It suddenly struck me that that tiny pea, pretty and blue, was the Earth. I put up my thumb and shut one eye, and my thumb blotted out the planet Earth. I didn't feel like a giant. I felt very, very small.
- NEIL ARMSTRONG, MISSION COMMANDER, APOLLO 11

Signature dedicated to the greatest achievement of mankind.

MILDLY DERANGED PHYSICIST does not mind BREAKING the SOUND BARRIER, because it is INSURED. - Simon_Jester considering the problems of hypersonic flight for Team L.A.M.E.
User avatar
Captain Seafort
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1750
Joined: 2008-10-10 11:52am
Location: Blighty

Re: Why I think Argo had Rear-firing phaser

Post by Captain Seafort »

PeZook wrote:Thing is, a weapon for self-defence is still better placed on top. Why? Because then a guy who's chasing you can't neuter your weapon by simply driving a bit to the side.
It would have to drive more than "a bit" to the side to get out of the line of fire. That phaser cannon looks to have something like a 30 degree angle of fire either side of the centreline. If they had enough of a speed advantage to get up alongside like that then I think their ability to stay out of the line of fire would be the least of your worries. Plus, of course, there's the issue of what putting it up on top would do to the centre of gravity.
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Why I think Argo had Rear-firing phaser

Post by Enigma »

Captain Seafort wrote:
Enigma wrote:They had a shuttle with them, except they landed it and took the Argo instead. The shuttle has shields and phaser (AFAIK all shuttle have them), plus they are much faster than a buggy. They could have done the job with a fraction of the time needed and the locals could just piss off. :)
However, at the time they landed they didn't know there were unfriendly locals about, so the ease of simply driving to the nearest piece of android, hopping out, grabbing it and hopping back in beat having to land the shuttle every time, open the back door, get out and grab the piece, get back in, close the door and take off again.

As for it's use as a military vehicle, I don't quite understand the vitriol directed against it. Sure, there's no protection and the weapon placement isn't the greatest, but it would still be a useful (very) light recce vehicle. It's mobility and firepower are a vast improvement on shanks' pony and a rifle, it's got wheels not antigrav so it won't be affected by any of the thousand and one this that screw with the magic forcefields, and if it's intended to bug out if it runs into trouble then the weapon placement makes sense - it can keep people's heads down as they retreat and it keeps the centre of gravity low.
So the Enterprise did not find any locals nearby when they scanned the planet?

Using a shuttle still makes sense that they don't even need to get out. Scan, locate, beam and then on to the next signal. Scan, locate, beam, etc....
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
aussiemuscle308
Padawan Learner
Posts: 201
Joined: 2011-01-20 10:53pm

Re: Why I think Argo had Rear-firing phaser

Post by aussiemuscle308 »

Mr Bean wrote:
Azron_Stoma wrote:Even this highly specific reason is not all that great a one because it's only an advantage during a very carefully specific instance...
if you miss!



(gives the opposing tank opportunity to return fire)
========================================
If you believe in Telekinesis, raise my hand.
Post Reply