Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go up

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
JasonB
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 136
Joined: 2011-03-23 10:31pm

Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go up

Post by JasonB »

The UFP soldier lost 104 soldiers during five month worth fighting before Sisko arrived. After Sisko left the UFP lost at minimal 1,580. How come UFP death total want up so much just at must few weeks.
User avatar
Darth Fanboy
DUH! WINNING!
Posts: 11182
Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Darth Fanboy »

Not enough Worfzookas.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)

"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
Darmalus
Jedi Master
Posts: 1131
Joined: 2007-06-16 09:28am
Location: Mountain View, California

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Darmalus »

JasonB wrote:After Sisko left the UFP lost at minimal 1,580. How come UFP death total want up so much just at must few weeks.
Where is this number from? If Memory Alpha is to be believed, the Federation lost 1,730 just during the time around the AR-558 events from the whole Dominion War. 1,580 casualties would be a drop in the death rate, it seems.

Edit: Maybe JasonB just mindlessly subtracted 150 from 1,730, but 107 of those were dead before they got there. Even if all 43 died (spoilers: they didn't) 1,687 died all over the war, having nothing at all to do with Sisko. I wonder how often Sisko gets those casualty lists. If he gets that list daily, it's a pretty minor conflict. I'm pretty sure 150 modern Earths would have more people die in car accidents per day.
Swindle1984
Jedi Master
Posts: 1049
Joined: 2008-03-23 02:46pm
Location: Texas

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Swindle1984 »

Shit, we've had battles where a million men were killed in a single day.
Your ad here.
User avatar
Darth Tanner
Jedi Master
Posts: 1445
Joined: 2006-03-29 04:07pm
Location: Birmingham, UK

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Darth Tanner »

Shit, we've had battles where a million men were killed in a single day.
What? When :?:
I'm pretty sure 150 modern Earths would have more people die in car accidents per day.
For one earth 2008 death toll was 16,164 dead a day of which about 3835 daily are traffic related.
Get busy living or get busy dying... unless there’s cake.
User avatar
Purple
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5233
Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Purple »

Darth Tanner wrote:
Shit, we've had battles where a million men were killed in a single day.
What? When :?:
I don't know about millions but if the history channel is to be believed the Somme claimed 60 kilopeople in about 1 hour.

Also, according to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Battle_of_the_Somme

Allied Losses: 623,907 casualties
German Losses: 465,000 men
Total: 1,088,907
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.

You win. There, I have said it.

Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Metahive »

That's casualties though, wounded, captured and missing as well as dead. Some of the bigger battles in WW2 might have claimed a million lives just on one day, but I'm not sure.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Serafina »

About the same numbers for the battles of Stalingrad, Leningrad, Berlin and Moscow during WW II.

And about 1.6 million casualties during the Brusilov offensive. That one lasted 108 days, with ~15.000 casualties per day.
The battle of the Somme had about the same casualty rate. The battles of Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad were pretty drawn out, so the casualty rate per day is not higher than that.
But the Battle of Berlin takes it all: It only lasted 16 days, which translates into 81.000 casualties PER DAY (including civilian casualites).

Of course, if you got strictly by casualties per day and include civilian losses, you can take the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and go up to 166.000 casualties in a single day. Those numbers were matched in some non-nuclear bombings.

Compared to that, the Siege of AR-558 was an extremely minor skirmish.


Lesson learned: Total war is incredibly brutal and causes immense loss of life. The Federation can be glad it never fought one.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Sea Skimmer
Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
Posts: 37390
Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
Location: Passchendaele City, HAB

Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go

Post by Sea Skimmer »

Purple wrote: I don't know about millions but if the history channel is to be believed the Somme claimed 60 kilopeople in about 1 hour.
The British took 57,000 casualties on the entire first day of which about 19,500 were killed. A million people killed in one day on the battlefield is only realistically going to happen in combat with use of nuclear weapons or a really effective biowarfare attack. Otherwise human beings just won't march into the guns quickly enough to die at that rate even given something truly massive like the fully mobilized Army of the USSR against a fully mobilized Red Chinese War Machine.

AR-558 is a joke. If either side had anything even remotely like a real land army from any point in the 20th century the battle would have been completely different. The fact that the Federation could not even build a decent breastwork in two and half months of defending the place is pretty bad. Never mind how illogical it is that no one used those super rock destroying phasers to blast some trenches into the ground. But that's the limitation of filming on a sound stage with a normal episode budget rather then outdoors.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
Post Reply