Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go up
Moderator: Vympel
Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go up
The UFP soldier lost 104 soldiers during five month worth fighting before Sisko arrived. After Sisko left the UFP lost at minimal 1,580. How come UFP death total want up so much just at must few weeks.
- Darth Fanboy
- DUH! WINNING!
- Posts: 11182
- Joined: 2002-09-20 05:25am
- Location: Mars, where I am a totally bitchin' rockstar.
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
Not enough Worfzookas.
"If it's true that our species is alone in the universe, then I'd have to say that the universe aimed rather low and settled for very little."
-George Carlin (1937-2008)
"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
-George Carlin (1937-2008)
"Have some of you Americans actually seen Football? Of course there are 0-0 draws but that doesn't make them any less exciting."
-Dr Roberts, with quite possibly the dumbest thing ever said in 10 years of SDNet.
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
Where is this number from? If Memory Alpha is to be believed, the Federation lost 1,730 just during the time around the AR-558 events from the whole Dominion War. 1,580 casualties would be a drop in the death rate, it seems.JasonB wrote:After Sisko left the UFP lost at minimal 1,580. How come UFP death total want up so much just at must few weeks.
Edit: Maybe JasonB just mindlessly subtracted 150 from 1,730, but 107 of those were dead before they got there. Even if all 43 died (spoilers: they didn't) 1,687 died all over the war, having nothing at all to do with Sisko. I wonder how often Sisko gets those casualty lists. If he gets that list daily, it's a pretty minor conflict. I'm pretty sure 150 modern Earths would have more people die in car accidents per day.
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1049
- Joined: 2008-03-23 02:46pm
- Location: Texas
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
Shit, we've had battles where a million men were killed in a single day.
Your ad here.
- Darth Tanner
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: 2006-03-29 04:07pm
- Location: Birmingham, UK
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
What? WhenShit, we've had battles where a million men were killed in a single day.
For one earth 2008 death toll was 16,164 dead a day of which about 3835 daily are traffic related.I'm pretty sure 150 modern Earths would have more people die in car accidents per day.
Get busy living or get busy dying... unless there’s cake.
- Purple
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
- Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
I don't know about millions but if the history channel is to be believed the Somme claimed 60 kilopeople in about 1 hour.Darth Tanner wrote:What? WhenShit, we've had battles where a million men were killed in a single day.
Also, according to Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Battle_of_the_Somme
Allied Losses: 623,907 casualties
German Losses: 465,000 men
Total: 1,088,907
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
That's casualties though, wounded, captured and missing as well as dead. Some of the bigger battles in WW2 might have claimed a million lives just on one day, but I'm not sure.
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)
Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula
O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)
Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula
O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
About the same numbers for the battles of Stalingrad, Leningrad, Berlin and Moscow during WW II.
And about 1.6 million casualties during the Brusilov offensive. That one lasted 108 days, with ~15.000 casualties per day.
The battle of the Somme had about the same casualty rate. The battles of Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad were pretty drawn out, so the casualty rate per day is not higher than that.
But the Battle of Berlin takes it all: It only lasted 16 days, which translates into 81.000 casualties PER DAY (including civilian casualites).
Of course, if you got strictly by casualties per day and include civilian losses, you can take the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and go up to 166.000 casualties in a single day. Those numbers were matched in some non-nuclear bombings.
Compared to that, the Siege of AR-558 was an extremely minor skirmish.
Lesson learned: Total war is incredibly brutal and causes immense loss of life. The Federation can be glad it never fought one.
And about 1.6 million casualties during the Brusilov offensive. That one lasted 108 days, with ~15.000 casualties per day.
The battle of the Somme had about the same casualty rate. The battles of Moscow, Leningrad and Stalingrad were pretty drawn out, so the casualty rate per day is not higher than that.
But the Battle of Berlin takes it all: It only lasted 16 days, which translates into 81.000 casualties PER DAY (including civilian casualites).
Of course, if you got strictly by casualties per day and include civilian losses, you can take the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and go up to 166.000 casualties in a single day. Those numbers were matched in some non-nuclear bombings.
Compared to that, the Siege of AR-558 was an extremely minor skirmish.
Lesson learned: Total war is incredibly brutal and causes immense loss of life. The Federation can be glad it never fought one.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick
Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick
Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
- Sea Skimmer
- Yankee Capitalist Air Pirate
- Posts: 37390
- Joined: 2002-07-03 11:49pm
- Location: Passchendaele City, HAB
Re: Why death rates after Sisko arrive at Siege of AR-558 go
The British took 57,000 casualties on the entire first day of which about 19,500 were killed. A million people killed in one day on the battlefield is only realistically going to happen in combat with use of nuclear weapons or a really effective biowarfare attack. Otherwise human beings just won't march into the guns quickly enough to die at that rate even given something truly massive like the fully mobilized Army of the USSR against a fully mobilized Red Chinese War Machine.Purple wrote: I don't know about millions but if the history channel is to be believed the Somme claimed 60 kilopeople in about 1 hour.
AR-558 is a joke. If either side had anything even remotely like a real land army from any point in the 20th century the battle would have been completely different. The fact that the Federation could not even build a decent breastwork in two and half months of defending the place is pretty bad. Never mind how illogical it is that no one used those super rock destroying phasers to blast some trenches into the ground. But that's the limitation of filming on a sound stage with a normal episode budget rather then outdoors.
"This cult of special forces is as sensible as to form a Royal Corps of Tree Climbers and say that no soldier who does not wear its green hat with a bunch of oak leaves stuck in it should be expected to climb a tree"
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956
— Field Marshal William Slim 1956