Why do people think Star Trek is scientific?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Why do people think Star Trek is scientific?

Post by Metahive »

Baffalo wrote:It might simply be that the Kaminoans view the clones exactly as they are: cloned, disposable soldiers. They knew that even if the clones survived the war (unlikely as it was) that they would have very short lives compared with normal humans. Also, they were human clones. It's one thing to clone members of your own species, but breeding humans for that purpose makes them think, "Oh well, it's just a worthless human who's meant to die anyway. Why should I care what happens to him?"
So, being a bunch of racist pricks that treat their sentient creations like cattle is supposed to make them look better? What kind of world do you live in?
Freefall wrote:No moreso than Ninja Turtles, GI Joe, H-Man, Voltron, Power Rangers, Transformers, etc. It might say something about our society that viewing acts of violence against machines is considered perfectly acceptable while acts of violence against people is not (though I think you'd need a pretty amazing argument to convince most people they shouldn't be any different), but I don't think it is any kind of actual message George Lucas was trying to send.
If you had seen any episode of Clone Wars and the amount of humanization even the battledroids get to the point of acting visibly depressed when oodles of them are about to be senselessly wasted and yet that fact is never acknowledged within the series by anyone, including the heroes, you'd be changing your tune quickly. Machines, no matter how self-aware -> fair play for everyone in the Warsverse. R2 is the only droid who gets any special consideration. None other does, including 3P0 who Padme at one point sends directly into a line of fire to lure some probe droids out and then chuckles at his distress.
My mistake on the name. I only remember two of them from AotC, and they seemed like perfectly reasonable, up-front business men to me, who also happened to take a lot of pride in the quality of their creations. I did not see anything sleazy or immoral about them there.
Just your average arms-dealers who sell their deadly toys to the highest bidder, eh? Nope, definitely nothing sleazy about that sort of people, not at all [/sarcasm].
As far as I'm aware, it's still not G-canon, which is basically what I'm discussing here, since the initial criticisms were all aimed at the initial movie, i.e. George Lucas, and what other authors may have added since then isn't really relevant to what he was saying. Now, if the cartoon episodes really do get a high level of personal attention from him, I might rethink that, but a general "Lucas seal of approval" doesn't mean a lot to me, since I have heard before that most of the EU is like that anyway, and he obviously hasn't even read any of it, nor does he seem to particularly care what happens in it as long as certain sacred cows are not violated.
I see you already conceded that point but it has to be stressed once again that the 3D Clone Wars series is one of Lucas' pet projects. Events happening within that series are perfectly valid canon, including all its numerous examples of presenting hi-tech and science as mostly being instruments of bad people.

To drive the point home, consider who the most heroic faction in the Warsverse are, the Jedi. Battlemages who rely mostly on their magic rather than gadgets and who approach the grand unifying energy field of their universe, the Force, from mostly a mystical angle to the point of anthropomorphizing it shamelessly. Meanwhile everyone approaching said energy field from a more scientific POV is firmly in the bad guy camp, like Thrawn or Galak Fyarr. Isn't that evidence enough for Wars' anti-science bias?
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Why do people think Star Trek is scientific?

Post by Metahive »

Baffalo wrote:It might simply be that the Kaminoans view the clones exactly as they are: cloned, disposable soldiers. They knew that even if the clones survived the war (unlikely as it was) that they would have very short lives compared with normal humans. Also, they were human clones. It's one thing to clone members of your own species, but breeding humans for that purpose makes them think, "Oh well, it's just a worthless human who's meant to die anyway. Why should I care what happens to him?"
So, being a bunch of racist pricks that treat their sentient creations like cattle is supposed to make them look better? What kind of world do you live in?
Freefall wrote:No moreso than Ninja Turtles, GI Joe, H-Man, Voltron, Power Rangers, Transformers, etc. It might say something about our society that viewing acts of violence against machines is considered perfectly acceptable while acts of violence against people is not (though I think you'd need a pretty amazing argument to convince most people they shouldn't be any different), but I don't think it is any kind of actual message George Lucas was trying to send.
If you had seen any episode of Clone Wars and the amount of humanization even the battledroids get to the point of acting visibly depressed when oodles of them are about to be senselessly wasted and yet that fact is never acknowledged within the series by anyone, including the heroes, you'd be changing your tune quickly. Machines, no matter how self-aware -> fair play for everyone in the Warsverse. R2 is the only droid who gets any special consideration. None other does, including 3P0 who Padme at one point sends directly into a line of fire to lure some probe droids out and then chuckles at his distress.
My mistake on the name. I only remember two of them from AotC, and they seemed like perfectly reasonable, up-front business men to me, who also happened to take a lot of pride in the quality of their creations. I did not see anything sleazy or immoral about them there.
Just your average arms-dealers who sell their deadly toys to the highest bidder, eh? Nope, definitely nothing sleazy about that sort of people, not at all [/sarcasm].
As far as I'm aware, it's still not G-canon, which is basically what I'm discussing here, since the initial criticisms were all aimed at the initial movie, i.e. George Lucas, and what other authors may have added since then isn't really relevant to what he was saying. Now, if the cartoon episodes really do get a high level of personal attention from him, I might rethink that, but a general "Lucas seal of approval" doesn't mean a lot to me, since I have heard before that most of the EU is like that anyway, and he obviously hasn't even read any of it, nor does he seem to particularly care what happens in it as long as certain sacred cows are not violated.
I see you already conceded that point but it has to be stressed once again that the 3D Clone Wars series is one of Lucas' pet projects. Events happening within that series are perfectly valid canon, including all its numerous examples of presenting hi-tech and science as mostly being instruments of bad people.

To drive the point home, consider who the most heroic faction in the Warsverse are, the Jedi. Battlemages who rely mostly on their magic rather than gadgets and who approach the grand unifying energy field of their universe, the Force, from mostly a mystical angle to the point of anthropomorphizing it shamelessly. Meanwhile everyone approaching said energy field from a more scientific POV is firmly in the bad guy camp, like Thrawn or Galak Fyarr. Isn't that evidence enough for Wars' anti-science bias?
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Re: Why do people think Star Trek is scientific?

Post by Baffalo »

Metahive wrote:So, being a bunch of racist pricks that treat their sentient creations like cattle is supposed to make them look better? What kind of world do you live in?
I never said it made them look better, I'm just trying to describe their behavior. That's the vibe I always got from them.
Metahive wrote:If you had seen any episode of Clone Wars and the amount of humanization even the battledroids get to the point of acting visibly depressed when oodles of them are about to be senselessly wasted and yet that fact is never acknowledged within the series by anyone, including the heroes, you'd be changing your tune quickly. Machines, no matter how self-aware -> fair play for everyone in the Warsverse. R2 is the only droid who gets any special consideration. None other does, including 3P0 who Padme at one point sends directly into a line of fire to lure some probe droids out and then chuckles at his distress.
C3PO is a protocol droid, not a battle droid, so sending him out into a fight and causing him to whine like a toy is meant to be funny for children. That's the entire point of the scene. Sure, making the battle droids look depressed is fine for humanization, but remember that they're ultimately just machines and know they were built for this purpose and given intelligence to carry out their orders. They may not like their lot in life but they know they were built for war and that to survive, they must fight and win.
Metahive wrote:Just your average arms-dealers who sell their deadly toys to the highest bidder, eh? Nope, definitely nothing sleazy about that sort of people, not at all [/sarcasm].
Hate to burst your little bubble here but last I checked, if you make good weapons of war and can sell them to the highest bidder, you don't need to be sleezy or downright evil. Do you think the people who place bids for modern military projects such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Motors, etc are all sleezy because they build weapons? No.
Metahive wrote:I see you already conceded that point but it has to be stressed once again that the 3D Clone Wars series is one of Lucas' pet projects. Events happening within that series are perfectly valid canon, including all its numerous examples of presenting hi-tech and science as mostly being instruments of bad people.

To drive the point home, consider who the most heroic faction in the Warsverse are, the Jedi. Battlemages who rely mostly on their magic rather than gadgets and who approach the grand unifying energy field of their universe, the Force, from mostly a mystical angle to the point of anthropomorphizing it shamelessly. Meanwhile everyone approaching said energy field from a more scientific POV is firmly in the bad guy camp, like Thrawn or Galak Fyarr. Isn't that evidence enough for Wars' anti-science bias?
I don't think so. It's more akin to anti-industrialization than anti-science because Jedi are artisans whose craft is the Force. They bend it, shape it, manipulate it to their will yet also are manipulated and shaped by it in turn. The brash young padawan seeks to gain better control, the Knight uses it as a tool quite handily, and the Master knows how to use the least effort to get the most gain. It's similar to the apprentice, journeyman, master stage of our history during the middle ages, when guilds would be set up to practice a craft. Thrawn and the like want to study the Force and gain mastery over it without themselves knowing how to use it naturally. If you can study this phenomena and then make it usable for the general public, the Jedi are no longer relevant. Sure, a Knight or Master might have better control, but if they're going up against an entire army wielding the Force, they know they're done for.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Why do people think Star Trek is scientific?

Post by Metahive »

Could a mod passing by please delete my double post above? Thank you.
Baffalo wrote:I never said it made them look better, I'm just trying to describe their behavior. That's the vibe I always got from them.
A pointless reply then.
C3PO is a protocol droid, not a battle droid, so sending him out into a fight and causing him to whine like a toy is meant to be funny for children.
That's making my point for me, Star Wars depicts violence against sentient beings as funny as long as they are made of screws and bolts instead of proper flesh and blood. Would have Padme done the same if 3P0 had been a human or alien servant instead? Would you still think it'd be funny if she had sent a Twi'lek, Sullustan or especially a human into a firefight and then thrown a grenade at his feet?

Side note: it's funny that 3P0 somehow survived the explosion mostly unharmed whereas the military-grade droids were utterly annihilated.
That's the entire point of the scene. Sure, making the battle droids look depressed is fine for humanization, but remember that they're ultimately just machines and know they were built for this purpose and given intelligence to carry out their orders. They may not like their lot in life but they know they were built for war and that to survive, they must fight and win.
It's pointless and unnecessarily cruel to program them that way. That's the point. It's like creating a toaster that cries in pain every time he's heated up. It's pure malice, I can't call it anything else.

And it's goddamn disturbing.
Hate to burst your little bubble here but last I checked, if you make good weapons of war and can sell them to the highest bidder, you don't need to be sleezy or downright evil. Do you think the people who place bids for modern military projects such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, General Motors, etc are all sleezy because they build weapons? No.
Yes, yes they are. Arms dealers rank third behind drug pushers and used-car salesmen on the sleazebag scale. Some would even put them first since they're the one's enabling shitbag nations like KSA or Bahrain to squash popular uprisings against their tyrannical ruling class.

Hate to burst your bubble here, buddy, but those people are commonly not considered to be an honorable lot.
I don't think so. It's more akin to anti-industrialization than anti-science because Jedi are artisans whose craft is the Force. They bend it, shape it, manipulate it to their will yet also are manipulated and shaped by it in turn. The brash young padawan seeks to gain better control, the Knight uses it as a tool quite handily, and the Master knows how to use the least effort to get the most gain. It's similar to the apprentice, journeyman, master stage of our history during the middle ages, when guilds would be set up to practice a craft. Thrawn and the like want to study the Force and gain mastery over it without themselves knowing how to use it naturally. If you can study this phenomena and then make it usable for the general public, the Jedi are no longer relevant. Sure, a Knight or Master might have better control, but if they're going up against an entire army wielding the Force, they know they're done for.
True, only the mystical people with the correct birthright may use it, all the people without that birthright who want it anyway and therefore try to harness it with tech instead of mysticism are evil.

How about you actually address this argument instead of...whatever you thought you were addressing?
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Why do people think Star Trek is scientific?

Post by Enigma »

You know, after reading a Cracked article regarding space lightning that is half as much longer than this galaxy and a body of water coming from a black hole that is so huge that it could easily snuff out the Sun, I find that the water blob in Voy isn't so farfetched after all. :)
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
TK-984
Redshirt
Posts: 42
Joined: 2008-07-28 12:24pm

Re: Why do people think Star Trek is scientific?

Post by TK-984 »

Because if you ask the scientific community what their favorite show was growing up, the chance that you'll hear "Star Trek" is pretty high.
Post Reply