Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or no?
Moderator: Vympel
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
it was real, as far as anyone is concerned - nothing to suggest it was a plot.
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
- Darth Tanner
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1445
- Joined: 2006-03-29 04:07pm
- Location: Birmingham, UK
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
bilateralrope wrote:Since I haven't seen the episode in a while: How do we know that the gateway was functional ?
Or at least close enough to functional that it could be repaired ?
It at least appears to be working fully, although they never show it in use, they don't use it to attack DS9 for instance.
Get busy living or get busy dying... unless there’s cake.
-
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 6167
- Joined: 2005-06-25 06:50pm
- Location: New Zealand
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
The other side of that gateway appears to be in the air. Which won't be good for anyone stepping through.
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
For reference:
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvQ0inEJiZY[/youtube]
If Weyoun's goal was something other than the destruction of the Iconian Gateway, there was absolutely no reason for him to tell Sisko about it, let alone lead him to it and help him blow it up! If it was about Odo, there are many ways of getting to him that wouldn't have required the Dominion to sacrifice a game-changing piece of technology. Hell, they could have just used the gateway to get at him.
And btw, I'm not saying that a rebellion would have actually occurred, or if it did that it would have been successful. In fact, the episode itself suggests that it wouldn't - the Jem'Hader working under Weyoun were well aware of the gateway and remained loyal (to the point that they executed Weyoun because he questioned their faith). I'm just pointing that the Dominion (rightly or wrongly) viewed the Gateway as a potential threat that had to be destroyed rather than used. That makes far more sense than some bizarre conspiracy on Weyoun's part.
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vvQ0inEJiZY[/youtube]
If Weyoun's goal was something other than the destruction of the Iconian Gateway, there was absolutely no reason for him to tell Sisko about it, let alone lead him to it and help him blow it up! If it was about Odo, there are many ways of getting to him that wouldn't have required the Dominion to sacrifice a game-changing piece of technology. Hell, they could have just used the gateway to get at him.
And btw, I'm not saying that a rebellion would have actually occurred, or if it did that it would have been successful. In fact, the episode itself suggests that it wouldn't - the Jem'Hader working under Weyoun were well aware of the gateway and remained loyal (to the point that they executed Weyoun because he questioned their faith). I'm just pointing that the Dominion (rightly or wrongly) viewed the Gateway as a potential threat that had to be destroyed rather than used. That makes far more sense than some bizarre conspiracy on Weyoun's part.
"I reject your reality and substitute my own!" - The official Troll motto, as stated by Adam Savage
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
or maybe it's on a hill.bilateralrope wrote:The other side of that gateway appears to be in the air. Which won't be good for anyone stepping through.
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
- Purple
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
- Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Ladders?bilateralrope wrote:The other side of that gateway appears to be in the air. Which won't be good for anyone stepping through.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
A fully functional Iconian gateway is 'tunable;' it is not a fixed point-to-point portal.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Is that even possible though? The Dominion has 100% control over reproduction, couldn't they have introduced the addiction as a genetic requirement?B5B7 wrote:While they are addicted the Dominion can use them to further its aggression. If freed from the dependency
That would be the Fail-safe, not only does the drug greatly reduce the risk of desertion or rebellion, but going without it too long means Death, as the Jem'Hadar's organs shutdown due to lacking the chemical for a certain length of time
In order to get them to part from the Founders you have to break their religious conviction, the dangerous thing about the Jem'Hadar isn't that they're constantly stoned on narcotics, it's that they're fanatically loyal to the Founders religion.they can choose whether to follow the Founders' orders. What would probably happen is schisms, with conflict amongst the Jem'Hadar,
Even after that problem is resolved, you have to contend with the fact that they're purebred undistilled soldiers, not a politician among them (that's what the Vorta are for.) You now have nomadic Barbarian bands that will reap destruction across the Alpha/Beta, and Gamma Quadrants, that can't be bargained with or negotiated, anyone not in their squadron/battalion is not just an enemy, but a resource to be raped.
Outside Section 31, I doubt the Federation would be at all amused by that possibility.and some even choosing to fight on behalf of the Federation, or as mercenaries.
The Romulans are in the market for a replacement warrior race, however.
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Retroviral engineering might allow you to remove the chemical dependency from adult Jem'Hadar. Or there might be some chemical substance that can substitute for ketracel white. Or perhaps even some form of nanotechnology or implant that produces and creates the stuff that you could stick inside a Jem'Hadar's body.FedRebel wrote:Is that even possible though? The Dominion has 100% control over reproduction, couldn't they have introduced the addiction as a genetic requirement?B5B7 wrote:While they are addicted the Dominion can use them to further its aggression. If freed from the dependency
That would be the Fail-safe, not only does the drug greatly reduce the risk of desertion or rebellion, but going without it too long means Death, as the Jem'Hadar's organs shutdown due to lacking the chemical for a certain length of time
So while it may not be possible to directly remove the addiction, there are several pathways that could be used to eliminate the problem.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
some borg nano probes from seven could probably do it.Simon_Jester wrote:Retroviral engineering might allow you to remove the chemical dependency from adult Jem'Hadar. Or there might be some chemical substance that can substitute for ketracel white. Or perhaps even some form of nanotechnology or implant that produces and creates the stuff that you could stick inside a Jem'Hadar's body.FedRebel wrote:Is that even possible though? The Dominion has 100% control over reproduction, couldn't they have introduced the addiction as a genetic requirement?B5B7 wrote:While they are addicted the Dominion can use them to further its aggression. If freed from the dependency
That would be the Fail-safe, not only does the drug greatly reduce the risk of desertion or rebellion, but going without it too long means Death, as the Jem'Hadar's organs shutdown due to lacking the chemical for a certain length of time
So while it may not be possible to directly remove the addiction, there are several pathways that could be used to eliminate the problem.
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
- Purple
- Sith Acolyte
- Posts: 5233
- Joined: 2010-04-20 08:31am
- Location: In a purple cube orbiting this planet. Hijacking satellites for an internet connection.
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Now that's a good idea. We could manufacture our own substitute and give them the option of being our slave race instead.Simon_Jester wrote:Or there might be some chemical substance that can substitute for ketracel white.
It has become clear to me in the previous days that any attempts at reconciliation and explanation with the community here has failed. I have tried my best. I really have. I pored my heart out trying. But it was all for nothing.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
You win. There, I have said it.
Now there is only one thing left to do. Let us see if I can sum up the strength needed to end things once and for all.
- FaxModem1
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 7700
- Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
- Location: In a dark reflection of a better world
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
I don't think the Federation would be kosher with that idea, as for all intents and purposes, the Jem'hadar are biological sentient beings, and the UFP is rather against the idea of slavery(yes, they kind of enslave holograms, but they're working on that).
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Purple is a tyranny-fetishist and has been for years, pay him no mind.
That said, yes, duplicating ketracel-white is probably the most likely to actually work. In a 'realistic' scenario the Federation would already know how to do this because it's not like they don't have captured samples of ketracel-white to work from. Even if they can't just punch the molecular structure into an E-Z-Bake Replicator Oven and press 'go,' it's not like they lack other means of synthesizing organic compounds.
At least make them work to find a way around that.
That said, yes, duplicating ketracel-white is probably the most likely to actually work. In a 'realistic' scenario the Federation would already know how to do this because it's not like they don't have captured samples of ketracel-white to work from. Even if they can't just punch the molecular structure into an E-Z-Bake Replicator Oven and press 'go,' it's not like they lack other means of synthesizing organic compounds.
It's likely that Borg technology could adapt for that purpose. Although I'd be leery of doing that. If the Borg ever reverse-engineer what you did with their technology, you've just given them the key to start assimilating Jem'Hadar en masse, which would otherwise be pretty much impossible for them because the freshly assimilated drones would all drop dead in short order.Prometheus Unbound wrote:some borg nano probes from seven could probably do it.
At least make them work to find a way around that.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Why would Jem'Hader drones just die? The bog standard Jem'Hader rely on their cocaine but a drone probably wouldn't need to. Drones survive without food, water, air, survive being frozen for hundreds of years, and are supposed to be able to regenerate from damage (I don't recall if drones where ever shown actually doing that, most just seem to die and stay dead except the frozen ones).
These are drones that like the Jem'Hader required their cocaine they required to eat, drink, breath, and not be frozen before being assimilated. I'd assume what mechanism allows the biological components of a drone of other races to go without normal biological functions would allow the Jem'Hader drones to go without ketracel white without dying.
These are drones that like the Jem'Hader required their cocaine they required to eat, drink, breath, and not be frozen before being assimilated. I'd assume what mechanism allows the biological components of a drone of other races to go without normal biological functions would allow the Jem'Hader drones to go without ketracel white without dying.
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Hm. That's a fair point. I'd just figured that the ketracel-white dependency was built into the Jem'Hadar on a cellular level and that basic biological functions would break down without it.
I mean, the Borg drones may not need food or drink, but one can reasonably suppose that their implants supply those needs. And the Borg would know how to make implants that can feed and hydrate drones, since virtually all species have needs for food and water. But if they encounter a previously unknown organism with unknown failure modes... less likely that they'd know what to do.
I mean, the Borg drones may not need food or drink, but one can reasonably suppose that their implants supply those needs. And the Borg would know how to make implants that can feed and hydrate drones, since virtually all species have needs for food and water. But if they encounter a previously unknown organism with unknown failure modes... less likely that they'd know what to do.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Wasn't it a point of the episode with the failed augments (DS9, Season 6, Episode Statistical Probabilities http://en.memory-alpha.wikia.com/wiki/S ... episode%29 ), that the Dominion couldn't replicate Ketracel-White and had to negotiate with the Federation during an armistice to get a planet, where they could get one of the ingredients?
The optimist thinks, that we live in the best of all possible worlds and the pessimist is afraid, that this is true.
"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
"Don't ask, what your country can do for you. Ask, what you can do for your country." Mao Tse-Tung.
- Imperial Overlord
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 11978
- Joined: 2004-08-19 04:30am
- Location: The Tower at Charm
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
It's important to remember that The Dominion as an institution isn't rational when it comes to the subject of Jem'Hadar rebellion and the projections of Vorta who are placed in an adveserial management position over them should be taken with more than a few grains of salt. The Founders created The Dominion to control all other life they encountered and created/modified the Jem'Hadar and the Vorta to run it for them. The Jem'Hadar are genetically engineered to be loyal to the Founders, indoctronated to be loyal to the Founders, and addicted to a substence that they can only obtain through the Vorta who they are frequently in conflict with in a classic divide and rule strategy. The Founders have done literally everything in their power to make the Jem'Hadar loyal and still have a Sword of Damacles hanging over their collective heads. That is fear.
The Vorta are constantly on the look out for disloyalty among the Jem'Hadar and are prone to seeing it even when its not there. The whole of the Dominion is based on an obsessive need to control all of its people. And what came of Weyoun's projections? The Jem'Hadar knew about what the renegades and the Iconian Gateway, even though he desperately feared that information getting loose. They did their duty to the Founders and then killed Weyoun for the insult of questioning their loyalty. Which is another thing not to over look. The Vorta and Jem'Hadar are placed into positions of conflict, undoubtedly to prevent them from joining forces and rebelling against the Founders. Jem'Hadar who kill Vorta doesn't mean their rebels, it means they're fragging an officer they really hate.
The Vorta are constantly on the look out for disloyalty among the Jem'Hadar and are prone to seeing it even when its not there. The whole of the Dominion is based on an obsessive need to control all of its people. And what came of Weyoun's projections? The Jem'Hadar knew about what the renegades and the Iconian Gateway, even though he desperately feared that information getting loose. They did their duty to the Founders and then killed Weyoun for the insult of questioning their loyalty. Which is another thing not to over look. The Vorta and Jem'Hadar are placed into positions of conflict, undoubtedly to prevent them from joining forces and rebelling against the Founders. Jem'Hadar who kill Vorta doesn't mean their rebels, it means they're fragging an officer they really hate.
The Excellent Prismatic Spray. For when you absolutely, positively must kill a motherfucker. Accept no substitutions. Contact a magician of the later Aeons for details. Some conditions may apply.
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Faking an iconican gateway that is not going to be used is not difficult. With the jamming field that was in place, all you'd need is some holodeck technology.
Especially when the Iconican homeworld, and the base there, did NOT have any of that stuff on it.
I'm wondering now if the Dominion didn't set it up, and waited specifically until Odo was around to spring the entire scenario. Certainly seems like their style.
Especially when the Iconican homeworld, and the base there, did NOT have any of that stuff on it.
I'm wondering now if the Dominion didn't set it up, and waited specifically until Odo was around to spring the entire scenario. Certainly seems like their style.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.
It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Something I always wondered from that episode.
In the briefing, someone (Dax I think maybe O'Brien) asks why not just fire on it from orbit. The answer give is "Even a direct hit by a torpedo wouldn't necessarily destroy the gateway".
My response would be "have ya tried?"
I mean, they were going to kill all the Jem Hadar down there anyway, why not do it from orbit. And if 1 wont necessarily destroy the gate, how about, like, 50 ?
And even if not, then fire at the surface anyway, kill the Jem'Hadar down there, then beam down with no opposition.
In the briefing, someone (Dax I think maybe O'Brien) asks why not just fire on it from orbit. The answer give is "Even a direct hit by a torpedo wouldn't necessarily destroy the gateway".
My response would be "have ya tried?"
I mean, they were going to kill all the Jem Hadar down there anyway, why not do it from orbit. And if 1 wont necessarily destroy the gate, how about, like, 50 ?
And even if not, then fire at the surface anyway, kill the Jem'Hadar down there, then beam down with no opposition.
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
They probably trust their analysis of the structure of the gateway to not bother shooting it. Its like someone saying just going by the material composition alone a 5.56 NEATO round couldn't hurt a Abrams tank. Someone wouldn't need to shoot it to confirm this. Furthermore just shooting it just because would destroy any element of surprise they had while not destroying their objective.Prometheus Unbound wrote:Something I always wondered from that episode.
In the briefing, someone (Dax I think maybe O'Brien) asks why not just fire on it from orbit. The answer give is "Even a direct hit by a torpedo wouldn't necessarily destroy the gateway".
My response would be "have ya tried?"
They could have also been worried about something unknown happening by shooting it. The Iconian gateway is supposed to be a portal to other worlds and is tech beyond what the Feddies (and most anyone else) can create. They may have been worried about whatever is powering the thing to be unleashed into a wormhole that could destroy whatever is on the other side. Considering the portals on the show opened up on on Earth, Bajor, the Enterprise, and other places its hard to say what bombing the crap out of it might do and where the energy might go.
They could have wanted to keep it intact to study it too. Such tech would be pretty damn game changing if they could reverse engineer it.
-
- Emperor's Hand
- Posts: 30165
- Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
I mean heck, in the TNG episode featuring an Iconian gateway, the gateway was used as a means to travel from the planetary surface to a point on the Enterprise.
It is at least conceivable that you could get the following outcome:
Sisko:
"Aha, I have fired a torpedo at you."
Jem'Hadar:
"Aha, fuck you, we have opened a gateway portal to a point right behind your chair. Have fun exploding."
Sisko:
"OH SH-"
Basically, having full control over an Iconian gateway can let you do most of the screwy stuff that people imagine doing with teleporters (beaming people into space, teleporting bombs through enemies' shields and hulls). Only without being as easy to defeat, deflect, jam, or deactivate as a transporter is.
They are not weapons to be taken lightly.
It is at least conceivable that you could get the following outcome:
Sisko:
"Aha, I have fired a torpedo at you."
Jem'Hadar:
"Aha, fuck you, we have opened a gateway portal to a point right behind your chair. Have fun exploding."
Sisko:
"OH SH-"
Basically, having full control over an Iconian gateway can let you do most of the screwy stuff that people imagine doing with teleporters (beaming people into space, teleporting bombs through enemies' shields and hulls). Only without being as easy to defeat, deflect, jam, or deactivate as a transporter is.
They are not weapons to be taken lightly.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
IT's just the wording. "Even a direct hit by a torpedo wouldn't necessarily destroy the gateway".Joun_Lord wrote:They probably trust their analysis of the structure of the gateway to not bother shooting it. Its like someone saying just going by the material composition alone a 5.56 NEATO round couldn't hurt a Abrams tank. Someone wouldn't need to shoot it to confirm this. Furthermore just shooting it just because would destroy any element of surprise they had while not destroying their objective.Prometheus Unbound wrote:Something I always wondered from that episode.
In the briefing, someone (Dax I think maybe O'Brien) asks why not just fire on it from orbit. The answer give is "Even a direct hit by a torpedo wouldn't necessarily destroy the gateway".
My response would be "have ya tried?"
What about two direct hits? 10? It just seems odd wording to me. Maybe it's just my head, but they approached the topic and shot it down why not say it more concretely - "the neutronium structure makes it immune to antimatter weapons" or some such. It sounds like they're not confident a single torp would do it, is all.
So fire them all. And fire your phasers on wide stun, to stun all the rogue jem'hadar!
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
- Eternal_Freedom
- Castellan
- Posts: 10413
- Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
- Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Maybe they wanted to avoid technobabble. Jut going with "a direct hit won't take it out" is easy to grasp without having to parse the "neutronium structures are invulnerable to antimatter weaponry" bit. The simpler statement also doesn't cause issues if they later need a neutronium structure to be destroyed without some super-nerd (yes, probably one of us) going "but you said that wouldn't work!"
The actual line says what it needs without being overly complicated or overly-limiting for future writers. Why make it more complex than they have to?
The actual line says what it needs without being overly complicated or overly-limiting for future writers. Why make it more complex than they have to?
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."
Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."
Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
-
- Jedi Master
- Posts: 1141
- Joined: 2007-09-28 06:46am
Re: Freeing the Jem'Hadar from their drug-addiction - yes or
Fair enough I guess
NecronLord wrote:
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.
Also, shorten your signature a couple of lines please.