Enterprise's BOLD NEW DIRECTION!

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Newtonian Fury
Padawan Learner
Posts: 323
Joined: 2002-09-16 05:24pm

Re: ...

Post by Newtonian Fury »

Jeremy wrote:I hope they don't considering they would find a way to just completely mangle the story.
Just for the record, I stopped watching Enterprise by about...October last year. It was getting painful.

In any case, even if the new plot does some major history revising, it might not be so bad if it opens up an opportunity to hire better and more military apt writers for Trek. We might actually see a more diverse weaponry inventory for a change. The crew member can actually be decent soldiers instead of these pajama boys. And watching ship battles might actually be worth it.
The three best things in life are a good landing, a good orgasm, and a good bowel movement. The night carrier landing is one of the few opportunities in life where you get to experience all three at the same time. -Unknown
User avatar
LordShaithis
Redshirt
Posts: 3179
Joined: 2002-07-08 11:02am
Location: Michigan

Post by LordShaithis »

By all means, piss on Trek continuity and give me something cool for a change.
If Religion and Politics were characters on a soap opera, Religion would be the one that goes insane with jealousy over Politics' intimate relationship with Reality, and secretly murder Politics in the night, skin the corpse, and run around its apartment wearing the skin like a cape shouting "My votes now! All votes for me! Wheeee!" -- Lagmonster
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16358
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Post by Gandalf »

neoolong wrote:
Gandalf wrote:I'd like to see Enterprise become a sitcom, all the stereotypical characters are there, and they have a dog. There's laughs to be had, and not laughs of frustration like now.
Fraiser in space? Or Friends in space.
I don't think the writers have the intellect to write "Frasier in Space", Friends in space could be cool. For a while. Every week they'd visit a planet, one would get sexually involved with a local, another two would have a cultural clash, and in new trek style, the rest grapple with some silly moral issue raised by the locals.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
Macross
Jedi Master
Posts: 1070
Joined: 2003-02-01 10:35pm
Contact:

Post by Macross »

Gandalf wrote:
neoolong wrote:
Gandalf wrote:I'd like to see Enterprise become a sitcom, all the stereotypical characters are there, and they have a dog. There's laughs to be had, and not laughs of frustration like now.
Fraiser in space? Or Friends in space.
I don't think the writers have the intellect to write "Frasier in Space", Friends in space could be cool. For a while. Every week they'd visit a planet, one would get sexually involved with a local, another two would have a cultural clash, and in new trek style, the rest grapple with some silly moral issue raised by the locals.
Unfortunatly, that would get real old rather quickly, just like "Friends." Has anybody actually wacthed Friends recently? They are all in their mid to late 30s and are still acting like a bunch of over-sexed college kids. Enough all ready!

Back on topic...wasnt the original premise of Enterprise supposed to be to take Trek in a Bold and New direction?
Iraq Weather Report: Sunni today, Shi’ite Tommorow

The Late Knights of Conan O'Brien - Frankenstein...Wasting a minute of your time!
User avatar
BenRG
Padawan Learner
Posts: 428
Joined: 2002-07-11 05:16am
Location: London, United Kingdom

What manner of creature is this?

Post by BenRG »

Macross wrote:Back on topic...wasnt the original premise of Enterprise supposed to be to take Trek in a Bold and New direction?
No, it was to continue to suck money from the Trek Cash Cow until it dies of dehydration. :(

Seriously, they probably wanted to find a new direction after the uber-technophillia of 'Voyager' backfired into audience apathy and cynicism. They were probably hoping to regain viewers with a 'back to basics' concept that reflected the attitude and atmosphere of the original series. However, they forgot that it wasn't the concepts that made TOS a classic, it was the writing by people like Dorothy Fontanna and Harlan Ellison. Without decent scripts, any show is doomed.

On the bright side, I understand that there are now a pair of new script writers on the ENT scene who are showing B&B how it is done.
BenRG - Liking Star Trek doesn't mean you have to think the Federation stands a chance!

~*~*~*~

Waiting for the New Republic to attack the Federation
darthdavid
Pathetic Attention Whore
Posts: 5470
Joined: 2003-02-17 12:04pm
Location: Bat Country!

Post by darthdavid »

Who votes we try and prod terrorists into ji-hading b and b?
Post Reply