Star Trek 09 review thread

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Master of Ossus »

I just got back from seeing it, and frankly I thought it was terrible. In fact, I honestly can't see how someone can look at this and believe it to have been a great movie. I can see people thinking it an entertaining film, but a great film, like the reviewers were promising? This was a 1.5; maybe a 2 star movie, but I can't honestly see anyone wanting to watch this film over Transformers.

Here's what worked:

1. Bones was okay.
2. Captain Pike was great.
3. Leonard Nimoy was back; he was reprising his old role, and it was fun. It was actually sensible.
4. The setting was actually okay: it came up with a way of allowing for differences between this Kirk, Spock, etc. and the original cast: it's essentially a universe-within-a-universe, and it's okay--I'm willing to meet them that far.
5. Spock+Uhura was interesting.
6. The special effects really were good.

Here's what was awful:
1. Nero=Shinzon v. 1.5. He's a better villain than Shinzon. He still sucks.
2. Frankly, I hated the changes they made to the characters. None of it worked. Spock didn't work. Kirk was terrible. Scotty was over-the-top and unfunny comic relief (when he finally came in). Uhura was useless. Chekov was a joke--think of Terry Pratchett's Igors and that's exactly how they play Chekov. Only Chekov is less believable (they let a 17 year old ensign address the entire ship and explain the plot up to that point while the competent and able-bodied captain looks over his shoulder from 4 feet away?). Sulu is the guy who plays Harold from Harold and Kumar, and he actually puts in a good performance, but his character is ridiculous. Turns out, Sulu's a great fencer. Just for emphasis, the bad guys happen to use bladed weapons rather than phasers or disruptors or guns or marbles so you can see Sulu in action. I felt like they looked over a character bio of each character from wikipedia, focused on one characteristic from each one, and then turned them into caricatures of that trait.
3. Red-matter.
4. The plot was... Nemesis v. 1.5.
5. Police Academy. Sorry, STAR FLEET Academy. I got a little mixed-up with those two, and I don't feel the least bit bad about it.

Frankly, a pathetic effort, all told. The Futurama movie series is both more intellectually interesting and much, much funnier (and, yes, a substantial fraction of this Star Trek is played for laughs). Futurama should be funnier than Star Trek--it's a comedy film. It should not have better, deeper characters, equally believable plots, and raise more thought-provoking questions.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
CaptainChewbacca
Browncoat Wookiee
Posts: 15746
Joined: 2003-05-06 02:36am
Location: Deep beneath Boatmurdered.

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by CaptainChewbacca »

speaker-to-trolls wrote:This stuff about Kirks unusually quick promotion has reminded me of something I didn't really understand in the movie: Uhura looked like a cadet at the time they left for Vulcan, she was wearing the cadets uniform and still seemed to be living in a university accomodation setup, but when they leave then she's a lieutenant, indicating she's been a full officer for some time, and she was decoding Klingon transmissions in the academy, which seems a bit advanced for cadets.
Honestly is there a problem with these facts or do I just not understand something about the military?
All of the cadets changed out of their uniforms, not just Uhura. I imagine being put into active service they were required to dress per their assigned operational spec. It would be confusing and difficult to find a medic or engineer if everyone was still in their academy reds.

I know they said 'three years later', but Pike said graduation took 4 years, so it would seem to me Kirk, Uhura, and Bones were all not fully-commissioned officers.
Stuart: The only problem is, I'm losing track of which universe I'm in.
You kinda look like Jesus. With a lightsaber.- Peregrin Toker
ImageImage
Worlds Spanner
Jedi Knight
Posts: 542
Joined: 2003-04-30 03:51pm

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Worlds Spanner »

CaptainChewbacca wrote:
speaker-to-trolls wrote:This stuff about Kirks unusually quick promotion has reminded me of something I didn't really understand in the movie: Uhura looked like a cadet at the time they left for Vulcan, she was wearing the cadets uniform and still seemed to be living in a university accomodation setup, but when they leave then she's a lieutenant, indicating she's been a full officer for some time, and she was decoding Klingon transmissions in the academy, which seems a bit advanced for cadets.
Honestly is there a problem with these facts or do I just not understand something about the military?
All of the cadets changed out of their uniforms, not just Uhura. I imagine being put into active service they were required to dress per their assigned operational spec. It would be confusing and difficult to find a medic or engineer if everyone was still in their academy reds.

I know they said 'three years later', but Pike said graduation took 4 years, so it would seem to me Kirk, Uhura, and Bones were all not fully-commissioned officers.
And then Kirk said he would do it in three.

Lingering question: Uhura and almost everyone on the "recruit transport" were already in reds - were they actually new recruits? Or were they current students who ere away from the Academy? (In Iowa? Maybe a tour of the shipyard?)
If you don't ask, how will you know?
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

I have to say that I actually liked this film, and I was quite prepared to be disappointed. Granted, this is with the caveat of the plot-holes and plausibility issues which have been raised in this thread and by a couple of reviewers: Starfleet's screwy ranking structure, command arrangements and promotional set-up, and the lack of development of Nero as a character —who was a more solid villain that Shinzon with a far better motive but had less on-screen development than Picard's Evil–Clone Skippy™ did in Nemesis; also no real explanation as to why Nero, who's out to undo the existence of the Federation, chooses a time period in which the Federation solidly exists instead of going back a little bit further in time before Earth and Vulcan even had spaceflight capability and destroying both worlds then, when he'd have no opposition to face. Really, this was the plot-logic of a comic book we got here.

However, where this movie does work is in it's casting, the handling of the characters overall (though using Scotty as comic-relief was a waste of both the character and the acting skills of Simon Pegg, who could handle a more solid dramatic part), and unloading a ton of excess baggage which Star Trek has built up over forty years. For this cast, I'd say the ones who shined the most were Zachary Quinto and Karl Urban, with Ben Cross delivering a rather decent Sarek for this film.

This movie also actually felt like a movie rather than just a blown-up TV episode, an experience I'd not enjoyed in a Star Trek film since The Undiscovered Country. It was also a film which, despite it's gaping defects in logic, didn't have me groaning at its stupidities; instead, I was actually able to enjoy this film. It had good pacing, took full advantage of the sweep of a cinematic stage, had several good character moments, didn't really have anybody who was truly unlikeable (the closest is Nero, but he's more of a cipher than an irritant), and most of it's humour worked. For the record, however, Shaky-Cam Must Die; it should be stricken from every manual of cinematographic style and it's practitioners ruthlessly purged from the industry.

Not a perfect movie by any means: I have issues with the overly convoluted doomsday weapon, the plot-holes in Nero's scheme, the goofy set up of Starfleet as an organisation, and both Kirk and Scotty's origin points could have been handled a lot better (Scotty really should already have been on the Enterprise under Capt. Pike, which would have made a lot more sense). Getting Kirk ejected from the Enterprise and marooned on Delta Vega was a clumsy way of getting him together with old Spock so he could serve the info-dump function. It worked where it needed to work the most, however, and that was in getting us to buy into a new set of actors playing the classical characters.

Now, for the next film, they just need a better, more logical plot.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Re:

Post by Kuja »

Patrick Degan wrote:also no real explanation as to why Nero, who's out to undo the existence of the Federation, chooses a time period in which the Federation solidly exists instead of going back a little bit further in time before Earth and Vulcan even had spaceflight capability and destroying both worlds then, when he'd have no opposition to face. Really, this was the plot-logic of a comic book we got here.
Actually, the movie does explain that part: the timewarp was a result of Nero's ship fucking with Spock's whirlygig. Nero didn't apparently have any control over where he was sent, (which was why he asked the Kelvin's captain the stardate) he just made the best of his situation. Preseumably once he'd smashed both Vulcan and Earth he would have slunk off to Romulus to present himself to the Empire.
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
Gil Hamilton
Tipsy Space Birdie
Posts: 12962
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Gil Hamilton »

I don't think Nero had a choice when he was due to go back in time. In the movie, Nero and Spock's ships get sucked into the Red Matter Hole and get sent back in time, but not by choice. It wasn't a controlled experiment. Once they ended up there and Nero realized that they were in the past, that's when he decide to wait for Spock to show up and then go on a rampage.

His first bit was to wait for Spock to come back in order to kill him. Then he captured the captain of the Kelvin and realized that for sure they were in the wrong time period. Then it became "OK, once Spock gets here, we'll steal the Red Matter and blow shit up." Vulcan was the first obvious target, because he wanted to punish Spock and because as a Romulan, the natural first choice in any action, from deciding on breakfast to what CD to put on for bedtime, is something anti-Vulcan. Then Earth, because it's the capital of the Federation, and based on how people tend to use "human", "StarFleet" and "Federation" interchangably, in Nero's perspective would represent the destruction of the Federation.

So Nero's plan was hatched after he landed in the past, not as a goal of travelling to the past.
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet

"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert

"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
User avatar
CaptainChewbacca
Browncoat Wookiee
Posts: 15746
Joined: 2003-05-06 02:36am
Location: Deep beneath Boatmurdered.

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by CaptainChewbacca »

I liked Nero. He wasn't a megalomaniac, he wasn't trying to conquer known space or unlock the secrets of infinity... he was just a blue-collar guy who'd lost everything and wanted to fuck the federation's shit up.
Stuart: The only problem is, I'm losing track of which universe I'm in.
You kinda look like Jesus. With a lightsaber.- Peregrin Toker
ImageImage
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Patrick Degan »

Gil Hamilton wrote:I don't think Nero had a choice when he was due to go back in time. In the movie, Nero and Spock's ships get sucked into the Red Matter Hole and get sent back in time, but not by choice. It wasn't a controlled experiment. Once they ended up there and Nero realized that they were in the past, that's when he decide to wait for Spock to show up and then go on a rampage.

His first bit was to wait for Spock to come back in order to kill him. Then he captured the captain of the Kelvin and realized that for sure they were in the wrong time period. Then it became "OK, once Spock gets here, we'll steal the Red Matter and blow shit up." Vulcan was the first obvious target, because he wanted to punish Spock and because as a Romulan, the natural first choice in any action, from deciding on breakfast to what CD to put on for bedtime, is something anti-Vulcan. Then Earth, because it's the capital of the Federation, and based on how people tend to use "human", "StarFleet" and "Federation" interchangably, in Nero's perspective would represent the destruction of the Federation.

So Nero's plan was hatched after he landed in the past, not as a goal of travelling to the past.
Alright, that makes a bit of sense and thinking back on the events of the movie appears to be the answer: Nero was essentially stuck in the time period his ship ended up in with no way to get back.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Kuja
The Dark Messenger
Posts: 19322
Joined: 2002-07-11 12:05am
Location: AZ

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Kuja »

The one part of the movie that really broke my suspension of disbelief was on the ice planet.

Kick gets kicked off the Enterprise? Um, okay, I guess I can buy it, he'll find a way to catch up again.

Kirk finds a cave and happens to run into Future Spock? Uh, that's stretching it a bit, but it makes a bit more sense after the explanation, though it was incredibly lucky of him.

Then Kirk and Spock run into Scotty, again completely by coincidence? Sorry, that's going too far for me. That was just too lucky, to the point where you're wondering of some kind of Hand of Fate is at work.

And then Scotty finds a way to beam them onto the Enterprise while at warp (based on an equation from an alternate reality where warp speed clearly works on a different scale) when minutes earlier Chekhov couldn't get a transport lock on a falling woman? Okay, tell me another one.
Last edited by Kuja on 2009-05-11 01:42am, edited 1 time in total.
Image
JADAFETWA
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Patrick Degan »

Kuja wrote:The one part of the movie that really broke my suspension of disbelief was on the ice planet.

Kick gets kicked off the Enterprise? Um, okay, I guess I can buy it, he'll find a way to catch up again.

Kirk finds a cave and happens to run into Future Spock? Uh, that's stretching it a bit, but it makes a bit more sense after the explanation, though it was incredibly lucky of him.

Then Kirk and Spock run into Scotty, again completely by coincidence? Sorry, that's going too far for me. That was just [/i]too[/i] lucky, to the point where you're wondering of some kind of Hand of Fate is at work.

And then Scotty finds a way to beam them onto the Enterprise while at warp (based on an equation from an alternate reality where warp speed clearly works on a different scale) when minutes earlier Chekhov couldn't get a transport lock on a falling woman? Okay, tell me another one.
Definitely one of the clumsiest bits of the film. They really needed more time at the keyboard on that one.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Knife »

On the military promotion bit; and I'm not too thrilled about the bump to O6 at the end, but there are things like battlefield promotions and bervet billets. As the actual CO of the Enterprise, it was well with in Pike's authority to make an ensign or midshipman as XO. While an XO would normally be a LtCmdr or Cmdr, there is no actual laws against Lt's being an XO of the ship depending on the ship and scope of mission.

There is an old saying in the military, 'don't confuse your rank with my authority'. There are plenty of times where in a unit structure, a person with inferior rank can be and will be technically in charge of a higher ranking personnel. Same with all the cadets on the ships, I'm sure they all got a 'bump' to ensign or Lieutenant upon getting activated for duty, as a temporary commission or by virtue of their billet.

All that said, I'd had preferred if they would have ended this movie with Kirk as XO and they could ahve jumped a couple years at the start of the next movie (lets face it, there will be another one) with Kirk as CO.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by tim31 »

Agreed. I couldn't help but fanboyishly enjoy the sight of Kirk in gold, crosslegged in The Chair, but it really was character wank. However, I also really don't care. I enjoyed it too much.

First repeat viewing is this Thursday, though.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Oskuro
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2698
Joined: 2005-05-25 06:10am
Location: Barcelona, Spain

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Oskuro »

Hehehe, we finally get a Trek movie that doesn't take itself too seriously, and here we are, taking it seriously. :D
unsigned
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Aaron »

Gil Hamilton wrote: If there was a situation where a young officer somehow legally ended up in command of a vessel in real life and during the course of his actions very publically saved the lives of every single person in the United States or Canada, you don't think the real life military would let him stay a captain at the end of it?
No I don't, I would expect him to receive a reward of some type. Perhaps confirmed at Lt. or Lt. Cmdr and given his choice of posting but not to remain as Captain. A brevet or field promotion is still subject to confirmation and there's no guarantee that he would get to keep it.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Havok »

Kuja wrote:when minutes earlier Chekhov couldn't get a transport lock on a falling woman? Okay, tell me another one.
Not accurate. He had the lock on Spock's mother. She fell out of the lock when the cliff collapsed in mid transport. And you can't really compare it to Kirk and Sulu's fall because Chekov had more time to establish the lock than the half second between Amanda's fall and presumably her death from impact. Especially with the time the transporters take in this reality.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Stofsk »

Cpl Kendall wrote:
Gil Hamilton wrote:If there was a situation where a young officer somehow legally ended up in command of a vessel in real life and during the course of his actions very publically saved the lives of every single person in the United States or Canada, you don't think the real life military would let him stay a captain at the end of it?
No I don't, I would expect him to receive a reward of some type. Perhaps confirmed at Lt. or Lt. Cmdr and given his choice of posting but not to remain as Captain. A brevet or field promotion is still subject to confirmation and there's no guarantee that he would get to keep it.
He did get a medal, but the promotion being confirmed may well have been a part of the reward as well.

I frankly don't see a huge problem with this. Starfleet seems to be a hyper-meritocracy. If you are talented, you get promoted. Also, Starfleet lost 7-8 ships in orbit of Vulcan, so maybe they have personnel shortages at that moment. There may not even be an officer who could take command of Enterprise, and since Pike gave Kirk a brevet promotion, why not honour it?
Image
User avatar
Fingolfin_Noldor
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11834
Joined: 2006-05-15 10:36am
Location: At the Helm of the HAB Star Dreadnaught Star Fist

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Fingolfin_Noldor »

The way they promoted Kirk in my opinion was too contrived. He jumped from a mere cadet to the rank of Captain? What? I would rather have him at the start of the crisis as a lieutenant and then he got bumped up fast because of his exemplary performance. That aside, character development could have been done slightly better with respect to the villains. We had a rather short on-screen time of the villains and not much to speak of.

The Red Matter bit though, does take the suspense of belief to the high end. That stuff is incredibly deadly crap that ought not to be even containable.
Image
STGOD: Byzantine Empire
Your spirit, diseased as it is, refuses to allow you to give up, no matter what threats you face... and whatever wreckage you leave behind you.
Kreia
User avatar
La Maupin
Youngling
Posts: 59
Joined: 2008-11-10 06:24pm

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by La Maupin »

Havok wrote:
Kuja wrote:when minutes earlier Chekhov couldn't get a transport lock on a falling woman? Okay, tell me another one.
Not accurate. He had the lock on Spock's mother. She fell out of the lock when the cliff collapsed in mid transport. And you can't really compare it to Kirk and Sulu's fall because Chekov had more time to establish the lock than the half second between Amanda's fall and presumably her death from impact. Especially with the time the transporters take in this reality.
Is it just this reality, though? There are very very few instances of a transporter beaming somebody who was not moving in a highly predictable way (i.e. standing on the deck of a ship moving at warp is one thing, quite another is somebody from under whose feet the ground just fell out.
At the time, you might think that it's a mistake you can never undo.
Even if it is, if we kick and scream and fight like hell, we'll move forward, even just a little bit.
I was taught to believe in the me that believed in myself. Maybe that's how it should be.
- Simon the Digger
ASVS Vets | Class of 2000
User avatar
Gandalf
SD.net White Wizard
Posts: 16359
Joined: 2002-09-16 11:13pm
Location: A video store in Australia

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Gandalf »

Havok wrote:
Kuja wrote:when minutes earlier Chekhov couldn't get a transport lock on a falling woman? Okay, tell me another one.
Not accurate. He had the lock on Spock's mother. She fell out of the lock when the cliff collapsed in mid transport. And you can't really compare it to Kirk and Sulu's fall because Chekov had more time to establish the lock than the half second between Amanda's fall and presumably her death from impact. Especially with the time the transporters take in this reality.
Don't forget that there was a black hole forming under her. That could have been a problem.

Also, the Scotty to Enterprise transport was transporting from a transporter. The Vulcan to Enterprise one was to a transporter. That could have been a key factor.
"Oh no, oh yeah, tell me how can it be so fair
That we dying younger hiding from the police man over there
Just for breathing in the air they wanna leave me in the chair
Electric shocking body rocking beat streeting me to death"

- A.B. Original, Report to the Mist

"I think it’s the duty of the comedian to find out where the line is drawn and cross it deliberately."
- George Carlin
User avatar
Aaron
Blackpowder Man
Posts: 12031
Joined: 2004-01-28 11:02pm
Location: British Columbian ExPat

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Aaron »

Stofsk wrote: He did get a medal, but the promotion being confirmed may well have been a part of the reward as well.

I frankly don't see a huge problem with this. Starfleet seems to be a hyper-meritocracy. If you are talented, you get promoted. Also, Starfleet lost 7-8 ships in orbit of Vulcan, so maybe they have personnel shortages at that moment. There may not even be an officer who could take command of Enterprise, and since Pike gave Kirk a brevet promotion, why not honour it?
IU it's in line with what we've seen from past Trek, so it fits and as long as the story is good then I'll be able to ignore it when I see it. That's really all I can ask out of fiction, right?

OOU, it is contrived but as someone mentioned before, it would have been a let down had Kirk not been given command.
M1891/30: A bad day on the range is better then a good day at work.
Image
User avatar
ray245
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7955
Joined: 2005-06-10 11:30pm

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by ray245 »

Just wondering, how do you guys find the Star Trek movie soundtrack?
Humans are such funny creatures. We are selfish about selflessness, yet we can love something so much that we can hate something.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Havok »

Well hearing it twice now, I really liked it. The subtleties of the original TOS score worked into it don't overpower and give just enough of a nod, while establishing that this is indeed a new Trek.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Coyote »

Stark wrote:Grow up. Are you saying he just gets... whatever he wants? He's got 'command potential' (ps lol) and the Genie says he's great shit... but it's not even the same man the Genie is talking about. If I save a guy from a burning building, do I get to skip all the procedure to become a firefighter too? What if I catch a bankrobber?
Not entirely the same; remember that Kirk had, in fact, already enrolled and completed his initial cadet training-- he had already become a 'firefighter' properly but had some discipline issues on his record when the event came up that allowed him to be a hero.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Coyote
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 12464
Joined: 2002-08-23 01:20am
Location: The glorious Sun-Barge! Isis, Isis, Ra,Ra,Ra!
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Coyote »

Gandalf wrote:Don't forget that there was a black hole forming under her. That could have been a problem.

Also, the Scotty to Enterprise transport was transporting from a transporter. The Vulcan to Enterprise one was to a transporter. That could have been a key factor.
All that, and, Chekov had to maintain the lock on everyone else.
Something about Libertarianism always bothered me. Then one day, I realized what it was:
Libertarian philosophy can be boiled down to the phrase, "Work Will Make You Free."


In Libertarianism, there is no Government, so the Bosses are free to exploit the Workers.
In Communism, there is no Government, so the Workers are free to exploit the Bosses.
So in Libertarianism, man exploits man, but in Communism, its the other way around!

If all you want to do is have some harmless, mindless fun, go H3RE INST3ADZ0RZ!!
Grrr! Fight my Brute, you pansy!
User avatar
Anguirus
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3702
Joined: 2005-09-11 02:36pm
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Anguirus »

Nero is at least as developed as TWOK Khan. Khan is a screaming plot device in Star Trek II. He gets the benefit of his "Space Seed" backstory, but then he is squandered. He doesn't get to use his intellect or anything else that made him dangerous, he's just a madman played by a charismatic actor.

Frankly, Star Trek II is a fun movie but it's no better than this movie. Neither of the films deserve the frantic fellating they get in reviews (especially non-professional ones) but both are a good time.

I'll also chime in that the ice planet scene was really the clunkiest part of the film. Only the performances saved it, the story logic is terrible and the monster was just a waste of screen time and money.

Also, while the fight on the drilling rig was a bit silly (like the rest of the movie, shocker) do note that both of the Romulans were packing disruptors (or whatever) that were wrestled or kicked away. At the close quarters that we saw it seemed pretty plausible.
"I spit on metaphysics, sir."

"I pity the woman you marry." -Liberty

This is the guy they want to use to win over "young people?" Are they completely daft? I'd rather vote for a pile of shit than a Jesus freak social regressive.
Here's hoping that his political career goes down in flames and, hopefully, a hilarious gay sex scandal.
-Tanasinn
You can't expect sodomy to ruin every conservative politician in this country. -Battlehymn Republic
My blog, please check out and comment! http://decepticylon.blogspot.com
Post Reply