The Star Trek trailer

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Samuel wrote:Didn't have the Prime Directive than.
Pretty sure they did. They just made less of a big deal out of it.
As for the bombardment, Kirk was bluffing... maybe. However, killing an ambassador is an act of war and the Enterprise is a warship- he would have been justified reducing them and the threat they posed to the Federation.
Maybe. But an all out planetary bombardment seems like completely excessive force against one world that couldn't really threaten the Federation. Its like responding to a hostage taking in Iraq by deploying nukes.
"I know its easy to be defeatist here because nothing has seemingly reigned Trump in so far. But I will say this: every asshole succeeds until finally, they don't. Again, 18 months before he resigned, Nixon had a sky-high approval rating of 67%. Harvey Weinstein was winning Oscars until one day, he definitely wasn't."-John Oliver

"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan."-General Von Clauswitz, describing my opinion of Bernie or Busters and third partiers in a nutshell.

I SUPPORT A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM OFFICE.
User avatar
Thanatos
Padawan Learner
Posts: 182
Joined: 2008-01-03 01:46pm
Location: Investigating that suspicious brothel!

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Thanatos »

Thanatos, that doesn't solve the problem.
Well: Spoiler
I've known quite a few people who have started like Kirk but managed to grow out of it and become excellent leaders. A lot of times, all it takes is actual responsibility to snap someone out of it, other times they need a kick in the ass. I imagine that Pike dying, old Spock showing up and Kirk being forced to take command of the Enterprise will be the kick in the ass that makes him into the character that he would normally be.
Pretty sure they did. They just made less of a big deal out of it.
They were sending an ambassador to establish relations, that makes it pretty obvious that Eminiar VII isn't covered by it.
However, killing an ambassador is an act of war and the Enterprise is a warship- he would have been justified reducing them and the threat they posed to the Federation.
There is also the contact ship the Federation had sent that disappeared. Which would obviously in retrospect have been destroyed by one of the two nations.

Plus they engaged in false flag tactics and repeatedly attacked a warship.
Marine Corps Tankers Proud and True, Band of Brothers known by Few.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Uraniun235 »

The dialogue in that episode clearly implies that Eminiar VII had shot down the last ship that visited the planet.
The Romulan Republic wrote:Kirk's basically saying: "stop killing each other or I'll wipe you all out."
That's not at all why Kirk issued the order. Kirk gave the order as a means of saving him and his officers and a Federation Ambassador after they had been taken hostage by a hostile force; if they killed him, he wouldn't be able to countermand the order, so killing him would be equivalent to suicide. It was a threat, sure, but what Kirk was really saying was "let us go or you won't live to regret it."

Afterward, when Kirk had control of the situation and fried the war computer, he didn't say "make peace or I'll shoot you"; he said "make peace or Vendicar will shoot you."
NecronLord wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:To be fair, Kirk was never the most cool headed individual. He made some glaring mistakes (like not raising shields in WoK), and he was too militaristic even by todays standards (didn't he almost order the total bombardment of a civilized world that wasn't even at war with the Federation?)
If you mean Emeniar Seven, it was holding hostages, and was actively attempting to force a UFP crew and an ambassador into a disintegration chamber. What's more, an actual attack would have killed no more people than the Emeniaran government killed in its simulated attacks (G.O. 24 is far from 'sterilisation') but would have broken their ability to make war and continue excecuting masses of their citizens.
I think you're mixing it up a little. When Kirk said an actual attack would have killed no more people than the simulations did, he was referring to an actual attack from Vendicar; given the tech disparity and the ruthlessness of the order (didn't Scotty say "all population centers and military bases" had been targeted?) I would expect significantly higher casualties from an attack by the Enterprise.
"There is no "taboo" on using nuclear weapons." -Julhelm
Image
What is Project Zohar?
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by The Romulan Republic »

That's not at all why Kirk issued the order. Kirk gave the order as a means of saving him and his officers and a Federation Ambassador after they had been taken hostage by a hostile force; if they killed him, he wouldn't be able to countermand the order, so killing him would be equivalent to suicide. It was a threat, sure, but what Kirk was really saying was "let us go or you won't live to regret it."
A dangerous bluff though. If they had killed him anyways, the Enterprise would have genocided a world in exchange for a few lives.
Afterward, when Kirk had control of the situation and fried the war computer, he didn't say "make peace or I'll shoot you"; he said "make peace or Vendicar will shoot you."
Probably you're right. I haven't seen it in a while.
I think you're mixing it up a little. When Kirk said an actual attack would have killed no more people than the simulations did, he was referring to an actual attack from Vendicar; given the tech disparity and the ruthlessness of the order (didn't Scotty say "all population centers and military bases" had been targeted?) I would expect significantly higher casualties from an attack by the Enterprise.
Exactly. An attack by the Enterprise would have dealt much more damage. Which is my point: Kirk was using excessive force.
"I know its easy to be defeatist here because nothing has seemingly reigned Trump in so far. But I will say this: every asshole succeeds until finally, they don't. Again, 18 months before he resigned, Nixon had a sky-high approval rating of 67%. Harvey Weinstein was winning Oscars until one day, he definitely wasn't."-John Oliver

"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan."-General Von Clauswitz, describing my opinion of Bernie or Busters and third partiers in a nutshell.

I SUPPORT A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM OFFICE.
User avatar
Burak Gazan
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1536
Joined: 2002-12-30 07:45pm
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Burak Gazan »

Excessive force? :wtf:

These morons had been playing cyber war for Five Hundred Years , not to mention destroying and murdering the crew of a prior federation starship. Then engaging in kidnapping, threatening, and opening fire on another federation starship. Frankly, they were extremely lucky the mission was diplomatic contact and trying to stop the war.

As Jim Kirk pointed out, real war is a very dirty, nasty business -- something to avoid at all costs. It aint no game
"Of course, what would really happen is that in Game 7, with the Red Sox winning 20-0 in the 9th inning, with two outs and two strikes on the last Cubs batter, a previously unseen meteor would strike the earth, instantly and forever wiping out all life on the planet, and forever denying the Red Sox a World Series victory..."
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Bounty »

Eminar has to do with the trailer how exactly?

Anyway, the trailer itself should start showing tomorrow, which means we'll have detailed descriptions and perhaps even some low-res video, with the HD version out Monday to pick apart. I can hardly wait.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Darth Wong »

Bounty wrote:Eminar has to do with the trailer how exactly?
We're arguing about: Spoiler
whether an aimless juvenile delinquent could realistically end up attaining such a prestigious posting and high rank so quickly. The claim was made that Kirk was always a reckless hothead, as evidenced by the Eminiar situation, and we were debating whether that situation actually means he was a hothead later in life.

BTW, you could have read all of this if you looked at the posts in the thread.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Bounty »

Ah, I see, I thought it had just drifted into a discussion about TOS Kirk. My bad.
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by McC »

Anecdotal evidence: I had a buddy in high school that was incredibly bright. He was well-read, had a good capacity for debate, etc. However, he came from a low-income family and wasn't really pushed to focus on academics. He ended up cutting school a lot, and almost never did homework 'cause he just didn't give a shit. The one time he did really well was when we paired up to do a history project that involved filming a demonstrative video (we used green screens, special effects, etc.; that's what I do, so we had the means to do it). He did all the research, script-writing, etc. He embraced it passionately, 'cause he was given a reason to. Fast-forward to now: the dude's got a full scholarship to school and has been maintaining a 4.0 GPA. He's been awarded the presidential achievement award (or something along those lines; the highest award his school confers).

Not quite the James Dean womanizer archetype, but it's a similar kind of turnaround. As his friend, I knew he was smart and capable and all that, but if you'd asked any of his teachers, they would have done that whole "Oh, yeah, not sure about him..." thing that teachers do when a problem student is brought up. He just needed the right motivation. He found it.
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Patrick Degan »

The Romulan Republic wrote:A dangerous bluff though. If they had killed him anyways, the Enterprise would have genocided a world in exchange for a few lives.
There is no indication that the Enterprise had the firepower to wipe out the entire planetary population. She certainly had the firepower to inflict the same amount of damage and death as a nuclear war would, and even in such an event, entire populations would not be wiped out.
An attack by the Enterprise would have dealt much more damage. Which is my point: Kirk was using excessive force.
No, he did not use excessive force, he used the threat of force. Very different thing.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Darth Wong »

McC wrote:Anecdotal evidence: I had a buddy in high school that was incredibly bright. He was well-read, had a good capacity for debate, etc. However, he came from a low-income family and wasn't really pushed to focus on academics. He ended up cutting school a lot, and almost never did homework 'cause he just didn't give a shit. The one time he did really well was when we paired up to do a history project that involved filming a demonstrative video (we used green screens, special effects, etc.; that's what I do, so we had the means to do it). He did all the research, script-writing, etc. He embraced it passionately, 'cause he was given a reason to. Fast-forward to now: the dude's got a full scholarship to school and has been maintaining a 4.0 GPA. He's been awarded the presidential achievement award (or something along those lines; the highest award his school confers).

Not quite the James Dean womanizer archetype, but it's a similar kind of turnaround. As his friend, I knew he was smart and capable and all that, but if you'd asked any of his teachers, they would have done that whole "Oh, yeah, not sure about him..." thing that teachers do when a problem student is brought up. He just needed the right motivation. He found it.
It's easy to turn it around if you start young, because you haven't really fallen too far behind. But if you're already old enough to be going into bars and you're still a delinquent, you're not going anywhere. Especially in something technically demanding, because that kind of knowledge is pyramidal.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by RedImperator »

Samuel wrote:Didn't have the Prime Directive than.

As for the bombardment, Kirk was bluffing... maybe. However, killing an ambassador is an act of war and the Enterprise is a warship- he would have been justified reducing them and the threat they posed to the Federation.
Within Trek canon, the Prime Directive existed at that time; I don't know if the writers had actually come up with it when the episode was produced. You could rationalize it a few ways; the inhabitants of the system had warp travel even if they didn't use it much, or cultural contamination had already happened so the Prime Directive no longer applied.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Patrick Degan wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:A dangerous bluff though. If they had killed him anyways, the Enterprise would have genocided a world in exchange for a few lives.
There is no indication that the Enterprise had the firepower to wipe out the entire planetary population. She certainly had the firepower to inflict the same amount of damage and death as a nuclear war would, and even in such an event, entire populations would not be wiped out.
If their were some poor bastards still huddling in caves, that's not really that big of an improvement. "Genocide" might have been going too far on my part, but it would still be a war crime, and the total destruction of their civilization to make a point.

And out of curiosity, are their known numbers for TOS fire power? I presume it would be lower than TNG, though given massive Federation demilitarization, perhaps not by that much. :wink:
An attack by the Enterprise would have dealt much more damage. Which is my point: Kirk was using excessive force.
No, he did not use excessive force, he used the threat of force. Very different thing.
Well its rather stupid to make a threat you can't or won't back up unless you have no other alternatives. And if I remember correctly, all indications were that the order would have been carried out. I don't think it was meant to be just a bluff.
"I know its easy to be defeatist here because nothing has seemingly reigned Trump in so far. But I will say this: every asshole succeeds until finally, they don't. Again, 18 months before he resigned, Nixon had a sky-high approval rating of 67%. Harvey Weinstein was winning Oscars until one day, he definitely wasn't."-John Oliver

"The greatest enemy of a good plan is the dream of a perfect plan."-General Von Clauswitz, describing my opinion of Bernie or Busters and third partiers in a nutshell.

I SUPPORT A NATIONAL GENERAL STRIKE TO REMOVE TRUMP FROM OFFICE.
User avatar
Anguirus
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3702
Joined: 2005-09-11 02:36pm
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Anguirus »

Spoiler
I imagine that Pike dying, old Spock showing up and Kirk being forced to take command of the Enterprise will be the kick in the ass that makes him into the character that he would normally be.
Hmm. If Pike dies, then they are really tearing canon a new asshole.
"I spit on metaphysics, sir."

"I pity the woman you marry." -Liberty

This is the guy they want to use to win over "young people?" Are they completely daft? I'd rather vote for a pile of shit than a Jesus freak social regressive.
Here's hoping that his political career goes down in flames and, hopefully, a hilarious gay sex scandal.
-Tanasinn
You can't expect sodomy to ruin every conservative politician in this country. -Battlehymn Republic
My blog, please check out and comment! http://decepticylon.blogspot.com
User avatar
Formless
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4143
Joined: 2008-11-10 08:59pm
Location: the beginning and end of the Present

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Formless »

Spoiler
Anguirus wrote:
I imagine that Pike dying, old Spock showing up and Kirk being forced to take command of the Enterprise will be the kick in the ass that makes him into the character that he would normally be.
Hmm. If Pike dies, then they are really tearing canon a new asshole.
So? let it get torn- this is a reboot. You don't want that kind of baggage in the first place in a reboot.
"Still, I would love to see human beings, and their constituent organ systems, trivialized and commercialized to the same extent as damn iPods and other crappy consumer products. It would be absolutely horrific, yet so wonderful." — Shroom Man 777
"To Err is Human; to Arrr is Pirate." — Skallagrim
“I would suggest "Schmuckulating", which is what Futurists do and, by extension, what they are." — Commenter "Rayneau"
The Magic Eight Ball Conspiracy.
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Post by Patrick Degan »

The Romulan Republic wrote:
Patrick Degan wrote:
The Romulan Republic wrote:A dangerous bluff though. If they had killed him anyways, the Enterprise would have genocided a world in exchange for a few lives.
There is no indication that the Enterprise had the firepower to wipe out the entire planetary population. She certainly had the firepower to inflict the same amount of damage and death as a nuclear war would, and even in such an event, entire populations would not be wiped out.
If their were some poor bastards still huddling in caves, that's not really that big of an improvement. "Genocide" might have been going too far on my part, but it would still be a war crime, and the total destruction of their civilization to make a point.
And apparently an action which was permissible under Starfleet regulations against a planet already committing acts of war on its own and for at least the last fifty years, starting with the destruction of the Valiant.
An attack by the Enterprise would have dealt much more damage. Which is my point: Kirk was using excessive force.
No, he did not use excessive force, he used the threat of force. Very different thing.
Well its rather stupid to make a threat you can't or won't back up unless you have no other alternatives. And if I remember correctly, all indications were that the order would have been carried out. I don't think it was meant to be just a bluff.
This isn't really a difficult conundrum to work out: yes, the order would have been carried out if things had gone wrong. The threat was what gave Kirk his leverage against Anan-7, and at no time did Kirk not have the option to carry out the order if things had gone wrong or to call it off if he was successful. But Anan couldn't know that and instead was forced down the path Kirk wanted him to take out of prudent fear. In that context, the General Order 24 ploy was a bluff and one backed by having the stronger hand.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Thanatos
Padawan Learner
Posts: 182
Joined: 2008-01-03 01:46pm
Location: Investigating that suspicious brothel!

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Thanatos »

Spoiler
Hmm. If Pike dies, then they are really tearing canon a new asshole.
Have you read all of what they've seen Nero do in the 20 minute preview? He's basically a new timeline generator.
Anyway, I saw Quantum of Solace tonight (because I am a gigantic Bond fan and a new ST trailer is just icing on that cake) and I have to say that I loved the trailer. A couple notes because I have to get up for work in like, five hours.
Spoiler
First off, I was right about the kick in the ass. People who describe young Kirk as a rebel in the trailer are missing the point so hard, I have to wonder how the fuck they got press passes. The theme of the trailer is basically Kirk has all this untapped talent but he's wasting it. The scenes of him acting out aren't glorified, they're treated like there's someone waiting off screen to ask him when the fuck he's going to grow up.

By the end of the trailer, he's taken over command (I'll admit I cheated: I've read a lot of summaries of the 20 minute preview, so I know the context of a lot of the scenes shown in the trailer) and acts completely different than he was in the beginning.

Visually, the movie looks fantastic IMHO. Can't really describe it all in detail because of how much was in there.
Marine Corps Tankers Proud and True, Band of Brothers known by Few.
User avatar
Anguirus
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3702
Joined: 2005-09-11 02:36pm
Contact:

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Anguirus »

'Twas merely an observation.

I'm holding off on seeing the trailer (though I've already read descriptions) till I see Bond tonight (hopefully).
"I spit on metaphysics, sir."

"I pity the woman you marry." -Liberty

This is the guy they want to use to win over "young people?" Are they completely daft? I'd rather vote for a pile of shit than a Jesus freak social regressive.
Here's hoping that his political career goes down in flames and, hopefully, a hilarious gay sex scandal.
-Tanasinn
You can't expect sodomy to ruin every conservative politician in this country. -Battlehymn Republic
My blog, please check out and comment! http://decepticylon.blogspot.com
User avatar
Admiral Drason
Jedi Knight
Posts: 768
Joined: 2002-09-04 05:43pm
Location: In my bomb shelter

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Admiral Drason »

I would also point out that the Enterprise was to be DECOMMISONED meaning that it was going to be scrapped anyway. Its not like he stole a brand new starship that was needed for the defence of the Federation, he stole a ship that was to be stricken from the fleet.
A truly wise man never plays leapfrog with a unicorn
So Say We All
Night Stalkers Don't Quit
HAB member
RIP Pegasus. You died like you lived, killing toasters
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Batman »

Decomissioned does NOT automatically mean she was going to be scrapped, at least not immediately. Not every ship/starship that's stricken off the active list is directly headed for the breakers, the Big E might have been supposed to go into mothballs or be turned into a museum ship (Valen knows she would have deserved it).
Doesn't change the fact that Kirk wasn't exactly depriving Starfleet of a valuable and highly important resource when he nabbed her of course.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Jon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1501
Joined: 2004-03-02 10:11am
Location: Manchester UK

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Jon »

The Trailer

http://www.flickr.com/photos/sfstreetlight/3030211291/

Apparently 20 or so seconds is missing off the end but eh.
User avatar
Thanatos
Padawan Learner
Posts: 182
Joined: 2008-01-03 01:46pm
Location: Investigating that suspicious brothel!

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Thanatos »

Apparently 20 or so seconds is missing off the end but eh.
A fair bit is missing but its surprisingly high quality.
Marine Corps Tankers Proud and True, Band of Brothers known by Few.
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Tsyroc »

Looks pretty good. 8)

I'm not sure about Kirk the juvenile delinquent though. That car he trashed had to be worth a fortune in the time period he's in. Plus who includes their middle name when spouting off to the cops? :lol:
By the pricking of my thumb,
Something wicked this way comes.
Open, locks,
Whoever knocks.
User avatar
Thanatos
Padawan Learner
Posts: 182
Joined: 2008-01-03 01:46pm
Location: Investigating that suspicious brothel!

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Thanatos »

That car he trashed had to be worth a fortune in the time period he's in.
Not necessarily. Antiques are an extremely weird market.
Marine Corps Tankers Proud and True, Band of Brothers known by Few.
User avatar
Jon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1501
Joined: 2004-03-02 10:11am
Location: Manchester UK

Re: The Star Trek trailer

Post by Jon »

Post Reply