So, being a bunch of racist pricks that treat their sentient creations like cattle is supposed to make them look better? What kind of world do you live in?Baffalo wrote:It might simply be that the Kaminoans view the clones exactly as they are: cloned, disposable soldiers. They knew that even if the clones survived the war (unlikely as it was) that they would have very short lives compared with normal humans. Also, they were human clones. It's one thing to clone members of your own species, but breeding humans for that purpose makes them think, "Oh well, it's just a worthless human who's meant to die anyway. Why should I care what happens to him?"
If you had seen any episode of Clone Wars and the amount of humanization even the battledroids get to the point of acting visibly depressed when oodles of them are about to be senselessly wasted and yet that fact is never acknowledged within the series by anyone, including the heroes, you'd be changing your tune quickly. Machines, no matter how self-aware -> fair play for everyone in the Warsverse. R2 is the only droid who gets any special consideration. None other does, including 3P0 who Padme at one point sends directly into a line of fire to lure some probe droids out and then chuckles at his distress.Freefall wrote:No moreso than Ninja Turtles, GI Joe, H-Man, Voltron, Power Rangers, Transformers, etc. It might say something about our society that viewing acts of violence against machines is considered perfectly acceptable while acts of violence against people is not (though I think you'd need a pretty amazing argument to convince most people they shouldn't be any different), but I don't think it is any kind of actual message George Lucas was trying to send.
Just your average arms-dealers who sell their deadly toys to the highest bidder, eh? Nope, definitely nothing sleazy about that sort of people, not at all [/sarcasm].My mistake on the name. I only remember two of them from AotC, and they seemed like perfectly reasonable, up-front business men to me, who also happened to take a lot of pride in the quality of their creations. I did not see anything sleazy or immoral about them there.
I see you already conceded that point but it has to be stressed once again that the 3D Clone Wars series is one of Lucas' pet projects. Events happening within that series are perfectly valid canon, including all its numerous examples of presenting hi-tech and science as mostly being instruments of bad people.As far as I'm aware, it's still not G-canon, which is basically what I'm discussing here, since the initial criticisms were all aimed at the initial movie, i.e. George Lucas, and what other authors may have added since then isn't really relevant to what he was saying. Now, if the cartoon episodes really do get a high level of personal attention from him, I might rethink that, but a general "Lucas seal of approval" doesn't mean a lot to me, since I have heard before that most of the EU is like that anyway, and he obviously hasn't even read any of it, nor does he seem to particularly care what happens in it as long as certain sacred cows are not violated.
To drive the point home, consider who the most heroic faction in the Warsverse are, the Jedi. Battlemages who rely mostly on their magic rather than gadgets and who approach the grand unifying energy field of their universe, the Force, from mostly a mystical angle to the point of anthropomorphizing it shamelessly. Meanwhile everyone approaching said energy field from a more scientific POV is firmly in the bad guy camp, like Thrawn or Galak Fyarr. Isn't that evidence enough for Wars' anti-science bias?