Star Trek 09 review thread

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
AMT
Jedi Knight
Posts: 865
Joined: 2008-11-21 12:26pm

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by AMT »

Havok wrote: It's actually a testament to the writers of ST III, that they saddled Kirk with real loss in that movie. The great and powerful TWOK, wasn't able to accomplish that.
Actually according to Shatner's bio they originally did. The scenes with 'Remember' and the Genesis planet with Spock's coffin on it were added in after the first test audiences were pretty much depressed and saddened because of the ending.

So... originally "The great and powerful TWOK" was able to accomplish that, before Studio Execs changed it. Which incidently pissed off Director/Writer Nick Meyers so much he refused to direct ST III
Patroklos
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2577
Joined: 2009-04-14 11:00am

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Patroklos »

No it doesnt. We see humans that live to be 120, but that is far from the norm and that also has no bearing on how long Romulans live. It just shows the upper limit of Vulcans. Find some 300 year old Romulans and then you may have a case.
You are welcome :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romulan
Romulans share the longevity common to their Vulcan cousins. In "Unification," the Romulan Senator Pardek shared a friendship with Ambassador Spock lasting at least 80 years. Romulans can be expected to have similar life spans as their Vulcan brothers. Romulans past 300 have been documented.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Uraniun235 »

AMT wrote:
Havok wrote: It's actually a testament to the writers of ST III, that they saddled Kirk with real loss in that movie. The great and powerful TWOK, wasn't able to accomplish that.
Actually according to Shatner's bio they originally did. The scenes with 'Remember' and the Genesis planet with Spock's coffin on it were added in after the first test audiences were pretty much depressed and saddened because of the ending.

So... originally "The great and powerful TWOK" was able to accomplish that, before Studio Execs changed it. Which incidently pissed off Director/Writer Nick Meyers so much he refused to direct ST III
I think you're pointing the finger at the studio a little too hard. If I remember the TWOK DVD interview right, Harve Bennett and Leonard Nimoy were behind that alteration, since Nimoy had since changed his mind about not wanting to be Spock.
"There is no "taboo" on using nuclear weapons." -Julhelm
Image
What is Project Zohar?
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
Patroklos
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2577
Joined: 2009-04-14 11:00am

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Patroklos »

On the matter of Starfleet's rather nebulous rank/seniority structure: I've spoken in other threads about the "Age of Sail" metaphor which was the underlying premise for the Enterprise's voyages in the original series. If you take that concept and apply it to nST's version of Starfleet, it becomes a bit more acceptable to swallow the idea of Kirk's swift rise to command given how Age of Sail navies often had midshipmen as young as 15, junior lieutenants as young as 20 or 21, and full post-Captains as young as 26 or 27. Lack of seniority was not a bar to rapid promotion especially in a time when navies were starved for command personnel and were on war-footings. The future Lord Nelson won promotion to the rank of post-Captain in the Royal Navy at age 21 in 1780, and was 47 when he died at Trafalgar in command of the British fleet.
BTW, this post is comlete BS.

In the British Navy at the time there was no academy, but every British Officer was required to spend several years as Midshipmen. When you could convince a captain to recommend you to the board you could then be tested as Lieutenant. As a Lieutenant (and sometimes before) you could become a "master and commander" which meant the commanding officer of a sloop or brig or similar small vessel. All major warships were commanded by post capatains, and the number of them and the availability of commands was STRICTLY limited by a seniority system. In fact the seniority system was so strict as to become oppressive, as it became near impossible to remove officers from it. In order command a first rate you would have had to have been a post captain for many years, and would have been master and commander of captain of several vessels previously. Even the Prince of Wales of Nelson's time was required to take the Lieutenants exam (specially administered by the Admiralty in his case) and serve as master and commander of a smaller ship before getting his captaincy of a frigate.

In Kirks case I could very well see him becoming a commanding officer of a smaller vessel due to his actions. His age at having his own command is not so much the problem, it is the command he gets at his age that is the problem. We have LTs command our patrol boats in the USN, and CDRs command Destroyers/Frigats/Small Deck Amphibs/SSN as well. They are all called "Captain" as a title, but not rank. If you look at Kirks arm bands at the end of the movie he is not just a "Captain" but also a Captain. There is no equivalent of anything like that happening in an modern navy or note.

As for Nelson, he got his first real command at the age of 23, but it was a frigate not a first rate as the Enterprise would represent in the movie. You have to remember though that back then naval officers started their careers very early, in Nelson's case he was 13 when he became a midshipmen AT SEA. He had 10 years of at sea experiance before recieving his first real command, Kirk had the equivalent of 0.
User avatar
AMT
Jedi Knight
Posts: 865
Joined: 2008-11-21 12:26pm

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by AMT »

Uraniun235 wrote:
AMT wrote:
Havok wrote: It's actually a testament to the writers of ST III, that they saddled Kirk with real loss in that movie. The great and powerful TWOK, wasn't able to accomplish that.
Actually according to Shatner's bio they originally did. The scenes with 'Remember' and the Genesis planet with Spock's coffin on it were added in after the first test audiences were pretty much depressed and saddened because of the ending.

So... originally "The great and powerful TWOK" was able to accomplish that, before Studio Execs changed it. Which incidently pissed off Director/Writer Nick Meyers so much he refused to direct ST III
I think you're pointing the finger at the studio a little too hard. If I remember the TWOK DVD interview right, Harve Bennett and Leonard Nimoy were behind that alteration, since Nimoy had since changed his mind about not wanting to be Spock.
It's possible on the Nimoy bit. I lumped Bennet in with "studio execs" since he was Paramount's hired gun at the time.
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Patrick Degan »

Patroklos wrote:
On the matter of Starfleet's rather nebulous rank/seniority structure: I've spoken in other threads about the "Age of Sail" metaphor which was the underlying premise for the Enterprise's voyages in the original series. If you take that concept and apply it to nST's version of Starfleet, it becomes a bit more acceptable to swallow the idea of Kirk's swift rise to command given how Age of Sail navies often had midshipmen as young as 15, junior lieutenants as young as 20 or 21, and full post-Captains as young as 26 or 27. Lack of seniority was not a bar to rapid promotion especially in a time when navies were starved for command personnel and were on war-footings. The future Lord Nelson won promotion to the rank of post-Captain in the Royal Navy at age 21 in 1780, and was 47 when he died at Trafalgar in command of the British fleet.
In the British Navy at the time there was no academy, but every British Officer was required to spend several years as Midshipmen. When you could convince a captain to recommend you to the board you could then be tested as Lieutenant. As a Lieutenant (and sometimes before) you could become a "master and commander" which meant the commanding officer of a sloop or brig or similar small vessel. All major warships were commanded by post capatains, and the number of them and the availability of commands was STRICTLY limited by a seniority system. In fact the seniority system was so strict as to become oppressive, as it became near impossible to remove officers from it. In order command a first rate you would have had to have been a post captain for many years, and would have been master and commander of captain of several vessels previously. Even the Prince of Wales of Nelson's time was required to take the Lieutenants exam (specially administered by the Admiralty in his case) and serve as master and commander of a smaller ship before getting his captaincy of a frigate.
I am well aware of these restrictions, also that there were times and circumstances when those restrictions could be and were bypassed (as was the case with Nelson). In the case of the movie, there appears to be a nebulous distinction between the Academy and field service for juniors, as is evidenced by the presence of a 17-year old Pavel Chekov on the Enterprise serving as a commissioned ensign when you'd think he'd not even be out of his first year at the Academy.
In Kirks case I could very well see him becoming a commanding officer of a smaller vessel due to his actions. His age at having his own command is not so much the problem, it is the command he gets at his age that is the problem. We have LTs command our patrol boats in the USN, and CDRs command Destroyers/Frigats/Small Deck Amphibs/SSN as well. They are all called "Captain" as a title, but not rank. If you look at Kirks arm bands at the end of the movie he is not just a "Captain" but also a Captain. There is no equivalent of anything like that happening in an modern navy or note.
Then very clearly, Starfleet is not organised in the same manner as a contemporary wet-water navy.
As for Nelson, he got his first real command at the age of 23, but it was a frigate not a first rate as the Enterprise would represent in the movie. You have to remember though that back then naval officers started their careers very early, in Nelson's case he was 13 when he became a midshipmen AT SEA. He had 10 years of at sea experiance before recieving his first real command, Kirk had the equivalent of 0.
Nelson was appointed post-captain of HMS Hinchinbroke on 11 June, 1779, at age 21.

We also do not know exactly how Starfleet/Starfleet Academy is arranged in this movie's construction of reality with respect to classroom instruction and field training. However, Starfleet mids/juniors would appear at the least to receive a far more accelerated learning programme and possibly combines both instruction and field experience as part of the course. Even in TOS there appeared to be some nebulosity in this regard: Kirk started out as a midshipman cadet and was sent on the Axanar peace mission, served as an ensign one starship, then went back to the Academy as an instructor before going out again as a full-time officer on another starship.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by RedImperator »

I thought the writers missed the point of the KM test by ordering Kirk to rescue KM, rather than leaving the option to him. That was the no-win scenario in Savvik's test: the civilians are doomed, but if you try to rescue them, the Klingons destroy you. There doesn't seem to be much of a test if you're ordered in, unless the other "no win" choice is to disobey orders.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Bounty »

Perhaps that's a refinement caused by Kirk's stunt. In the original, the cadets are faced with a mission they can't complete, but because they go down as heroes by default the impact is lessened (ie, they realise they can easily die in the line of duty, but they don't have any input in that decision so they don't carry any moral responsibility). The 'new' KM adds a personal choice, which would make the test a better reflection of the choices that need to be made by commanders in the field and makes it relevant to a new batch of cadets who know about Kirk's antics.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Darth Wong »

I still haven't seen the film, but regarding the KM test in general, it seemed to me that the only conceivable point of the KM test as an exercise is to teach cadets that it is sometimes necessary to beat a strategic retreat. Let's look at the strategic factors involved in the hypothetical KM scenario, if I recall them correctly:

1) Treaty stipulations strictly prohibit crossing of the border.
2) Violation of that treaty is an act of war.
3) There is a ship across the border which is broadcasting a distress call.
4) Federation starships are obligated to answer distress calls.

This is not really as great a dilemma as it appears to be. From the standpoint of regulations, while a Federation starship is obligated to answer a distress call, there is no indication that this rule overrides any and all other rules, laws, and treaties. From the standpoint of ethics, the passengers on the transport are in a very dangerous spot, but if you commit an act of war by crossing the border with a military vessel, then you risk the safety of billions.

The correct course of action would be to contact the Klingons and ask for permission to rescue the transport, or ask the Klingons to rescue the ship themselves.

By altering the simulation to make it possible to achieve all of his goals without compromise, Kirk should actually fail the test, since the whole purpose of the test is to teach the commander the value of discretion and the need to occasionally balance one objective against another.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10385
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Solauren »

According to the movie, the idea of the KM is to induce fear in the Cadet.

Which I think is the STUPIDEST reason combat simulation test I can think of. It's a test/simulation, you can't be killed. What they hell are you getting afraid of?

It would be a better test if it was to see how far the Captain was willing to go, and what they were willing to do, to achieve a goal.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Darth Wong »

Solauren wrote:According to the movie, the idea of the KM is to induce fear in the Cadet.
The way Kirk described it in the movie, the purpose of the KM scenario is to test a cadet's ability to "face death". And of course, as you point out, that's stupid because the cadet knows it's just a simulation so he's not really "facing death" at all. But Kirk is the last person who should be explaining the purpose of the KM scenario, since he cheated it!
Which I think is the STUPIDEST reason combat simulation test I can think of. It's a test/simulation, you can't be killed. What they hell are you getting afraid of?

It would be a better test if it was to see how far the Captain was willing to go, and what they were willing to do, to achieve a goal.
As I described above, I think it might have possibly been a test of a captain's tendency toward foolish cowboy behaviour. You don't want captains who go off half-cocked and start wars because they think with their balls instead of their brains. One might argue that the original point of it was lost over time, and it simply became a tradition which no one really understood or questioned any more. Hence Kirk's bizarre interpretation.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Havok »

Patroklos wrote:
No it doesnt. We see humans that live to be 120, but that is far from the norm and that also has no bearing on how long Romulans live. It just shows the upper limit of Vulcans. Find some 300 year old Romulans and then you may have a case.
You are welcome :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romulan
Romulans share the longevity common to their Vulcan cousins. In "Unification," the Romulan Senator Pardek shared a friendship with Ambassador Spock lasting at least 80 years. Romulans can be expected to have similar life spans as their Vulcan brothers. Romulans past 300 have been documented.
Oh cool an uncited source from wikipedia. :roll: Sorry, that doesn't fly.

And even if it is accurate, which I doubt, it still only shows an upper limit. McCoy lived to be older than 137. That doesn't mean that every single human lives that long.

On top of that, if Nero was alive in the time you suggest, (around 2232) he would show much more aging as he would only be only a little off from Spock Prime's age when he arrived in the past, and then he would have aged 25 more years.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Bounty »

And of course, as you point out, that's stupid because the cadet knows it's just a simulation so he's not really "facing death" at all.
But he can fail the test despite doing everything right, which is as close to imparting a sense of inevitable doom as any test can get.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Havok »

Darth Wong wrote:The correct course of action would be to contact the Klingons and ask for permission to rescue the transport, or ask the Klingons to rescue the ship themselves.
I think part of the reason you have to rescue the KM is because the Klingons are going to either capture it or destroy it, as it is a Fed ship on their side of the neutral zone, along with a hull breach.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Darth Wong »

Havok wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:The correct course of action would be to contact the Klingons and ask for permission to rescue the transport, or ask the Klingons to rescue the ship themselves.
I think part of the reason you have to rescue the KM is because the Klingons are going to either capture it or destroy it, as it is a Fed ship on their side of the neutral zone, along with a hull breach.
Yeah, well, if American citizens wandered into North Korea and got themselves captured, I doubt the US government would immediately send in the military to rescue them by force without trying diplomatic measures first. You simply can't take potential acts of war so lightly that any Captain can do that sort of thing without even bothering to consult with the Admiralty.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
User avatar
Kamakazie Sith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7555
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:00pm
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Kamakazie Sith »

Havok wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:The correct course of action would be to contact the Klingons and ask for permission to rescue the transport, or ask the Klingons to rescue the ship themselves.
I think part of the reason you have to rescue the KM is because the Klingons are going to either capture it or destroy it, as it is a Fed ship on their side of the neutral zone, along with a hull breach.
What I remember of the distress call in TWOK is that the KM was losing life support. It was one of those situations that you had to act immediately. However, IMO violating treaty stipulations with an empire that thrives on war is just stupid. Unfortunately, the crew of the KM would be lost as trying to save her would likely endanger the lives of billions. It's a pretty easy but tragic choice.
Milites Astrum Exterminans
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Ghost Rider »

Havok wrote:
Patroklos wrote:
No it doesnt. We see humans that live to be 120, but that is far from the norm and that also has no bearing on how long Romulans live. It just shows the upper limit of Vulcans. Find some 300 year old Romulans and then you may have a case.
You are welcome :)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romulan
Romulans share the longevity common to their Vulcan cousins. In "Unification," the Romulan Senator Pardek shared a friendship with Ambassador Spock lasting at least 80 years. Romulans can be expected to have similar life spans as their Vulcan brothers. Romulans past 300 have been documented.
Oh cool an uncited source from wikipedia. :roll: Sorry, that doesn't fly.
To be honest, you have to demonstrate why it's doesn't fly. Evidence from Wikipedia is at time faulty, but throwing it out because it disagrees with you is just poor debating. One demonstrates why it's inaccurate thus forcing the other party to come up with better sources if possible.

Anyways, the KM is fashioned in a way that demonstrates either any lack of foresight or contrived drama. Forcing a cadet to make a choice that will make him lose is demoralizing and simple bullying, and worse still it's common knowledge it is a no win scenario. You're already entering the situation with a rather poor morale. A test should see how one wins, overcomes, and solves problems not to see how one fucks up less.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Havok »

Darth Wong wrote:
Havok wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:The correct course of action would be to contact the Klingons and ask for permission to rescue the transport, or ask the Klingons to rescue the ship themselves.
I think part of the reason you have to rescue the KM is because the Klingons are going to either capture it or destroy it, as it is a Fed ship on their side of the neutral zone, along with a hull breach.
Yeah, well, if American citizens wandered into North Korea and got themselves captured, I doubt the US government would immediately send in the military to rescue them by force without trying diplomatic measures first. You simply can't take potential acts of war so lightly that any Captain can do that sort of thing without even bothering to consult with the Admiralty.
Oh for sure, but Starfleet Captains operate with some measure of autonomy, especially in Kirk's day, so the decision may be solely up to them at certain times. Also IIRC, not attempting the rescue is considered a failure.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
erik_t
Jedi Master
Posts: 1108
Joined: 2008-10-21 08:35pm

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by erik_t »

Darth Wong wrote:
Havok wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:The correct course of action would be to contact the Klingons and ask for permission to rescue the transport, or ask the Klingons to rescue the ship themselves.
I think part of the reason you have to rescue the KM is because the Klingons are going to either capture it or destroy it, as it is a Fed ship on their side of the neutral zone, along with a hull breach.
Yeah, well, if American citizens wandered into North Korea and got themselves captured, I doubt the US government would immediately send in the military to rescue them by force without trying diplomatic measures first. You simply can't take potential acts of war so lightly that any Captain can do that sort of thing without even bothering to consult with the Admiralty.
Wasn't the (a) neutral zone violated routinely in TOS? Starfleet does seem to have a "no harm, no foul" attitude to neutral zone violations. If it all works out well, then no disciplinary action ever seems to result.
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Havok »

Ghost Rider wrote:
Havok wrote:Oh cool an uncited source from wikipedia. :roll: Sorry, that doesn't fly.
To be honest, you have to demonstrate why it's doesn't fly. Evidence from Wikipedia is at time faulty, but throwing it out because it disagrees with you is just poor debating. One demonstrates why it's inaccurate thus forcing the other party to come up with better sources if possible.
Fair enough.

The TNG episode Sarek establishes that there are Vulcans that live to be over 200.

While the only source that provides for anything like that for Romulans is The Way of D'era: The Romulans, which is a role playing game supplement, which also makes it a non canon source and inadmissible as evidence per Star Trek canon rules.
Ignoring that, it only provides for Romulans living over the 200 mark, not 300.

So again, if you can find a documented CANON source of Romulans living to be 300, please provide it.

I'll even throw out Pardek, as we know he was in public service for almost 90 years or so, and was friends with Spock for 80 IIRC. Even given that lengthy professional life, it puts him no where near the 300 mark in life span.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Ghost Rider »

Havok wrote:
Ghost Rider wrote:
Havok wrote:Oh cool an uncited source from wikipedia. :roll: Sorry, that doesn't fly.
To be honest, you have to demonstrate why it's doesn't fly. Evidence from Wikipedia is at time faulty, but throwing it out because it disagrees with you is just poor debating. One demonstrates why it's inaccurate thus forcing the other party to come up with better sources if possible.
Fair enough.

The TNG episode Sarek establishes that there are Vulcans that live to be over 200.

While the only source that provides for anything like that for Romulans is The Way of D'era: The Romulans, which is a role playing game supplement, which also makes it a non canon source and inadmissible as evidence per Star Trek canon rules.
Ignoring that, it only provides for Romulans living over the 200 mark, not 300.

So again, if you can find a documented CANON source of Romulans living to be 300, please provide it.
The first one demonstrates that the lower limit is 200. It's a source one can use for canon, but is not an absolute limit. The other is by your admission, inadmissable.

And I don't care, but the way you are approaching this is giving your opponent ample opportunity to keep pissing on you. Another thing is that you have to demonstrate that 300 is not happening or outside the boundries of common Romulan lifespan. In giving the Sarek quote, you've bolstered his point by allowing him the thought that over 200, with canon giving no specific time of how far that extends.

The way you should've approached it is asked him for a more specific source on the Wikipedia claim, not simply thrash and flail and give him an example that can demonstrate his case further.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Havok
Miscreant
Posts: 13016
Joined: 2005-07-02 10:41pm
Location: Oakland CA
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Havok »

Ah. I see what you are saying. Trying to post arguments at work is always bad for me. Customers bug me just enough to keep my train of thought off track.
Image
It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Hit it.
Blank Yellow (NSFW)
"Mostly Harmless Nutcase"
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Ghost Rider »

Havok wrote:Ah. I see what you are saying. Trying to post arguments at work is always bad for me. Customers bug me just enough to keep my train of thought off track.
LOL, I completely understand. I post here to...get away from clients for a bit.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
User avatar
Themightytom
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2818
Joined: 2007-12-22 11:11am
Location: United States

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Themightytom »

Wow ghost rider that was an impressive explanation. Thats the most reasonable suggestion for interpreting an argument supported by Wikipedia since the site's inception, including suggestions in an academic forum.

You should work for MLA

"Since when is "the west" a nation?"-Styphon
"ACORN= Cobra obviously." AMT
This topic is... oh Village Idiot. Carry on then.--Havok
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Re: Star Trek 09 review thread

Post by Uraniun235 »

I think TWOK implied that the scenario was a Klingon trap.


I figured that, as originally designed, the "test of character" might have simply been to assess whether the cadet remains collected and continues to follow procedure as the situation deteriorates (e.g. remembering to jettison the log buoy) or if they seize up in confusion or desperation as their ship goes down in flames around them. When the battle's been lost, will you still have the wits about you to try to look after what's left of your crew and ship, or will you throw up your hands and give up?
"There is no "taboo" on using nuclear weapons." -Julhelm
Image
What is Project Zohar?
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
Post Reply