E-E's new systems and shields?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
seanrobertson
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2145
Joined: 2002-07-12 05:57pm

E-E's new systems and shields?

Post by seanrobertson »

Hiya.

I hear that the E-E used new, or at least not-yet-seen, torpedo
tubes in "Nemesis." Was the model (physical or CGI) altered
to accomodate these changes, and ARE they indeed changes?

Also, we all know the E-E plowed into Scimitar at a slow
speed. But has anyone estimated the size of the Warbird chunk,
or the velocity thereof, that struck the E-E? I saw the film
but honestly cannot recall much about that scene, other than it
happened.

Since this was somewhat technical and didn't contain any
real spoilers, I figured it might as well go in the Pure ST
forum. If I'm wrong in assuming that I apologize in advance.
Pain, or damage, don't end the world, or despair, or fuckin' beatin's. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, ya got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man ... and give some back.
-Al Swearengen

Cry woe, destruction, ruin and decay: The worst is death, and death will have his day.
-Ole' Shakey's "Richard II," Act III, scene ii.
Image
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: E-E's new systems and shields?

Post by Alyeska »

I can answer this one.
seanrobertson wrote: I hear that the E-E used new, or at least not-yet-seen, torpedo
tubes in "Nemesis." Was the model (physical or CGI) altered
to accomodate these changes, and ARE they indeed changes?
They did indeed add new weapon systems to the model itself. Prior to Nemesis there were 4 torpedo launchers and 1 quantum torpedo launcher. After Nemesis there were 8 torpedo launchers and 1 (possibly 2) quantum torpedo launchers. They also added at least 4 new phaser arrays. Give me a few minutes and I will detail the new weapons.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Darth Servo
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 8805
Joined: 2002-10-10 06:12pm
Location: Satellite of Love

Post by Darth Servo »

Why do they need different launchers for photon torpedos vs quantum torps?
"everytime a person is born the Earth weighs just a little more."--DMJ on StarTrek.com
"You see now you are using your thinking and that is not a good thing!" DMJay on StarTrek.com

"Watching Sarli argue with Vympel, Stas, Schatten and the others is as bizarre as the idea of the 40-year-old Virgin telling Hugh Hefner that Hef knows nothing about pussy, and that he is the expert."--Elfdart
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Darth Servo wrote:Why do they need different launchers for photon torpedos vs quantum torps?
The torpedoes are shapped differently. Possibly slightly different size. The system that propells the torpedoes out might be different depending on the torpedo casing.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Stormbringer
King of Democracy
Posts: 22678
Joined: 2002-07-15 11:22pm

Post by Stormbringer »

And you've got the anti-matter to deal with as well. With a quantum torpedo you don't have to worry about that.
Image
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Re: E-E's new systems and shields?

Post by Master of Ossus »

seanrobertson wrote:Also, we all know the E-E plowed into Scimitar at a slow
speed. But has anyone estimated the size of the Warbird chunk,
or the velocity thereof, that struck the E-E? I saw the film
but honestly cannot recall much about that scene, other than it
happened.
I don't have any way of looking at that scene until after the DVD comes out, but the Valdore's wing is so small that it will likely have little KE associated with it, even though its rotational speed was fairly great when it struck the E-E. I would guess that the impace is fairly consistent with the results that I showed for the E-E's collision with the Scimitar, though it's possible that the E-E's shielding is slightly greater than that of the Scimitar. Incidentally, the wing of the Valdore struck the E-E twice, and so it will be more difficult to get a measurement, as we do not know which shield protects the starboard nacelle.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
seanrobertson
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 2145
Joined: 2002-07-12 05:57pm

Re: E-E's new systems and shields?

Post by seanrobertson »

Master of Ossus wrote: I don't have any way of looking at that scene until after the DVD comes out, but the Valdore's wing is so small that it will likely have little KE associated with it, even though its rotational speed was fairly great when it struck the E-E. I would guess that the impace is fairly consistent with the results that I showed for the E-E's collision with the Scimitar, though it's possible that the E-E's shielding is slightly greater than that of the Scimitar. Incidentally, the wing of the Valdore struck the E-E twice, and so it will be more difficult to get a measurement, as we do not know which shield protects the starboard nacelle.
That's kind of what I thought, too.

I vaguely remember you talking about the impact somewhere...
was it in the Darkstar Smackdown pages, maybe? (That was
good stuff, btw.) I'll have to go to the "What do you think"
thread again...between it and the Adarx debates Brian is
having at Babtech, I've had a lot of catch-up reading to do :)

And Alyeska, thanks for breaking the systems down for me.
That's a big help. I also dabble in starship models, and
the modeling community was in an uproar over some of
the new shots of the E-E in "Nemesis" (hence my inquiries).
None of the existing models out there have these new
torpedo launchers or the more extensive aztec patterns,
either. (Check out federationmodels.com for an all-resin,
accurate-up-'til "Nemesis" E-E in the Alliance Models section.
It's vastly superior to AMT-Ertl's E-E kit from what I'm told.)
Some of us are trying to decide if updating the Alliance version
is worth the trouble *fumes*...
Pain, or damage, don't end the world, or despair, or fuckin' beatin's. The world ends when you're dead. Until then, ya got more punishment in store. Stand it like a man ... and give some back.
-Al Swearengen

Cry woe, destruction, ruin and decay: The worst is death, and death will have his day.
-Ole' Shakey's "Richard II," Act III, scene ii.
Image
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

It was in the RSA pages under the "Star Trek: Nemesis" headline. This is the relevent section, in which I make some calculations. To be honest, I was astonished at how low the firepower was, as calculated here. I expected it to be low, but not THIS low.
I wrote:
DarkStar wrote:"The nature of the shielding systems is curious . . . the Enterprise seemed to plow right through them without impediment. Some have claimed this as proof that shields don't stop physical impacts, or that the shield energy of the Scimitar could not have exceeded the KE of the Enterprise, but these are preposterous claims. We saw the Enterprise-E shields deflecting large pieces of a Romulan cruiser earlier in the battle, knocking the debris away from the saucer and then the port nacelle. In the case of the Scimitar, we either have a secondary shield system that cannot block physical impact (which would assume that the primaries could, and that they had failed at this point), or that technobabble was employed off-camera while we watched proceedings from Shinzon's point-of-view, or that his new cloaking system required oddly-configured shields. In any case, I have no intention of throwing away the rest of the evidence for physical impact protection (including some from this very film) in favor of the claim that starships don't have KE shields."
This is merely another one of Mr. Anderson's pro-Trek claims that come from nowhere. While it is clear the starship shields are more than capable of stopping physical impacts (like photon torpedoes or the section of the hull that Anderson mentions), it is also impossible to rule out that the shields were simply not capable of deflecting such a large impact. Considering that the relatively small section of the Valdore class warbird, which struck the E-E twice, knocked its shields down by an enormous percent—down to ten percent from an unspecified but probably very high percent, and certainly one larger than forty percent because they were trying to hide another set of shields that had been depleted to that percentage by using their forward shields—we come up with a fairly consistent idea of how good Trek shielding is against KE impacts. Thus, we know with a high degree of certainty that ST ships' shields are designed to stop collisions, and we know that the Scimitar's shields did little or nothing to stop the E-E. All of this indicates that the shields were inadequate to stop the E-E.

Now, Anderson meekly responds to these concerns about the Scimitar's shields. According to Occam's Razor, when we have two competing theories [which both fit the data equally well], the one with fewer terms is [superior, ie- there is no reason to choose an unnecessarily complex theory]. Anderson claims that the primary shields might have been the only ones designed to stop physical impacts. Apparently, Mr. Anderson would have us believe that the primary shields made up less than thirty percent of the total shielding on the Scimitar, because that is the percentage of the shield that had been "knocked out" up to that point in the engagement. Had the primary shields failed, we should have heard about it, or we should have heard that the Scimitar had a much smaller fraction of its shields up than it did. Anderson goes on to state two other possibilities:
DarkStar wrote:"that technobabble was employed off-camera while we watched proceedings from Shinzon's point-of-view, or that his new cloaking system required oddly-configured shields."
Of course, either of these views is absolutely absurd. If we employ Occam's Razor, which is mentioned above, then the unseen "technobabble" would violate it by adding another term. Additionally, the principle of parsimony tells us that unless we have evidence to believe something is going on, it probably is not. This is why we do not assume that God or alien abductions are real just because we have no evidence that they are not real. Mr. Anderson is employing a logical fallacy in attempting to tell us that technobabble is being used off-screen, particularly since we see that Picard commands everyone to brace for impact. If he was ordering technobabble to take place, he should have done that before he ordered the crew to brace for impact.

Now for some quick calculations. We don't know how much the E-E masses, nor what its actual volume is, but we can get a reasonable idea. The length of the ship is about 680 meters. Its beam is 240 meters, and its height is 87 meters1. For these calculations, it will be assumed that the ship is a perfect, rectangular box. It clearly is not, and its actual volume is likely somewhere between one half, and one quarter of the volume here calculated. Now, that gives the E-E a volume of 14,198,400 cubic meters. Assuming that the ship's density is that of iron, the ship will thus mass a total of 1.07E11 kilograms (This could, theoretically, be low. It's possible that the ship would be more dense than iron, but it would have to be far more dense in order to raise the total mass of the actual ship beyond the one here calculated. Remember that the ship is filled with empty space, including a long shaft shown in this very movie, with lots of lightweight plastic and ceramic-looking parts.). The collision speed was 30 meters/second. We can easily plug these numbers in to a KE calculator, and we find that the ship did ½(1.07E11*30²) = 4.81E13 joules to the Scimitar. Now, this is still being very generous. Remember that the E-E took substantial damage from the collision- indicating that it also absorbed a considerable amount of the impact energy itself. It also disregards the mass lightening effect of ST ships, which would lower this even further. Thus, this should be treated as a fairly high-end estimate of the amount of energy involved in the collision.

In any case, the shields of the Scimitar were lowered from seventy percent to zero, and the E-E continued on as if nothing had happened. Let us, however, assume for the moment that the Scimitar did manage to stop the E-E using just its shields. This would mean that the Scimitar has shielding equal to 4.81E13 joules, or the equivalent of less than 15 kilotons. It further means that all of the weapons fire that struck the Scimitar during the battle was the equivalent of just 5 kilotons! Most of the E-E's weaponry missed its target. According to Gil Hamilton's count2, at least eight torpedoes and three quantum torpedoes hit the Scimitar, as well as numerous phaser and disruptor shots. If we assume that only photon torpedoes hit the Scimitar, and that the quantum torpedoes and phasers and disruptors did no damage, we find that the yield of a photon torpedo is merely .625 kilotons. This means that an X-Wing can match a photon torpedo for firepower with just eleven shots!3 That calculation, incidentally, gives every possible advantage to Star Trek. It involves a lower limit for X-Wing firepower, and the enormously generous calculations above for both the collision, and for calculating the torpedo firepower.
DarkStar wrote:"The Tech

Wow . . . they handled things well this time out . . ."
BTW, Gil privately told me he had seen the movie again, and had counted substantially more confirmed "hits" by the E-E on the Scimitar.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
User avatar
Illuminatus Primus
All Seeing Eye
Posts: 15774
Joined: 2002-10-12 02:52pm
Location: Gainesville, Florida, USA
Contact:

Post by Illuminatus Primus »

If we assume that only photon torpedoes hit the Scimitar, and that the quantum torpedoes and phasers and disruptors did no damage, we find that the yield of a photon torpedo is merely .625 kilotons. This means that an X-Wing can match a photon torpedo for firepower with just eleven shots!
What is the X-Wing's weapons' firepower assumption? I'd put it at 2 kt max reasonably, and that's conservative thinking how much firepower that old patrol ship (Slave I) put out against the Jedi Starfighter, when we'd expect a frontline modern starfighter to cut through the Jedi Starfighter's defenses more quickly. Even 5 kt would seem reasonable to me.

Also, as a fix for the inconsistencies Ossus has shown above, are we assuming that the shield's ability to absorb KE and radiation/energy is different? Or just chalk it up to ST stupidity?
Last edited by Illuminatus Primus on 2003-01-16 06:52pm, edited 1 time in total.
"You know what the problem with Hollywood is. They make shit. Unbelievable. Unremarkable. Shit." - Gabriel Shear, Swordfish

"This statement, in its utterly clueless hubristic stupidity, cannot be improved upon. I merely quote it in admiration of its perfection." - Garibaldi in reply to an incredibly stupid post.

The Fifth Illuminatus Primus | Warsie | Skeptical Empiricist | Florida Gator | Sustainability Advocate | Libertarian Socialist |
Image
User avatar
Master of Ossus
Darkest Knight
Posts: 18213
Joined: 2002-07-11 01:35am
Location: California

Post by Master of Ossus »

Illuminatus Primus wrote:
If we assume that only photon torpedoes hit the Scimitar, and that the quantum torpedoes and phasers and disruptors did no damage, we find that the yield of a photon torpedo is merely .625 kilotons. This means that an X-Wing can match a photon torpedo for firepower with just eleven shots!
What is the X-Wing's weapons' firepower assumption? I'd put it at 2 kt max reasonably, and that's conservative thinking how much firepower that old patrol ship (Slave I) put out against the Jedi Starfighter, when we'd expect a frontline modern starfighter to cut through the Jedi Starfighter's defenses more quickly. Even 5 kt would seem reasonable to me.
I used the lower-limit 60 GJ reported by Mike's site. I referenced that in the original report, but the BBS does not support proper end-notes.
"Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail." "Shut up, just shut up!" -Two Guys from Kabul

Latinum Star Recipient; Hacker's Cross Award Winner

"one soler flar can vapririze the planit or malt the nickl in lass than millasacit" -Bagara1000

"Happiness is just a Flaming Moe away."
Post Reply