A starfleet ship question

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12236
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

A starfleet ship question

Post by Lord Revan »

Ok we know that Constitution-class seems to be the primary (sort of a flagship(as showing the federation "flag" rather then having flag officers on board)) for the TOS-era Federation, licenced products and fandom seems to add ships larger and/or more powefull to the fleet (before the Excelsior and other newer generation designs), so my question is what role would these other ships serve in starfleet (besides pointless starship porn and fanwank that is)?

personally I think should such ships exist it would for starfleet to say "would you please kindly bend over" to a power/nation (especially a minor one) where as a Constitution on warfooting would be saying "we are serious, stop this at once or else!"
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Starglider »

Lord Revan wrote:Ok we know that Constitution-class seems to be the primary (sort of a flagship(as showing the federation "flag" rather then having flag officers on board)) for the TOS-era Federation, licenced products and fandom seems to add ships larger and/or more powefull to the fleet (before the Excelsior and other newer generation designs), so my question is what role would these other ships serve in starfleet (besides pointless starship porn and fanwank that is)?
The Constitution is described as a 'heavy cruiser' in a lot of the fluff, and does in fact seem to be treated like a historical naval cruiser; it operates alone for long periods, showing the flag, responding to minor incursions, patrolling dangerous areas and executing assorted non-military missions. The large 'dreadnoughts' are described as operating like historical battleships, and this is pretty reasonable; they're held in reserve and committed to large fleet actions only. Starfleet only has a few of them because they're expensive (to build and operate) and not much use in peacetime, and Starfleet has a large peacetime role. However when it comes down to it a force of battleships will spank a force of cruisers of equivalent tonnage; Trek technology, at least in the TOS era, seems to mirror this historical situation.
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12236
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Lord Revan »

Prannon wrote:Has it ever been revealed what these star-dreadnaughts actually are onscreen?
as far as I know the Excelsior is the heaviest ship to appear onscreen and tbh to me it seemed to be a only new generation heavy cruiser (aka a replacement for the connie), pre-TNG that is.
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by tim31 »

The schematics were seen on a monitor, making them semi-canon. I can't remember what movie(one of the first three).
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Lord Revan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12236
Joined: 2004-05-20 02:23pm
Location: Zone:classified

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Lord Revan »

tim31 wrote:The schematics were seen on a monitor, making them semi-canon. I can't remember what movie(one of the first three).
the first during the first bridge scene IIRC
I may be an idiot, but I'm a tolerated idiot
"I think you completely missed the point of sigs. They're supposed to be completely homegrown in the fertile hydroponics lab of your mind, dried in your closet, rolled, and smoked...
Oh wait, that's marijuana..."Einhander Sn0m4n
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Knife »

Neo Trek seems to adjust that with the caterman-esque ship shown in the movie.

That said, in ST III, I believe, the Klingon's refer to the Ent as a Federation Battle Cruiser. However the designation of 'cruiser' seems to fit in the terms Starglider outlined.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Starglider »

A lot of the 'Federation dreadnought' designs are just ugly lumps (and not even functional-ugly, like the Wars designs), but I do like this one, from the SFC/Klingon Academy games.

Image
Image
Image

It's one of the few Trek EU designs that I would genuinely like to be canon.
User avatar
Fingolfin_Noldor
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11834
Joined: 2006-05-15 10:36am
Location: At the Helm of the HAB Star Dreadnaught Star Fist

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Fingolfin_Noldor »

Yeah, that battleship design looked mean and befitting what a TOS warship ought to be like. But by the time of TNG, the idea of a battleship disappeared in favour of stupid pleasure craft.
Image
STGOD: Byzantine Empire
Your spirit, diseased as it is, refuses to allow you to give up, no matter what threats you face... and whatever wreckage you leave behind you.
Kreia
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11948
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Crazedwraith »

I've never seen that design from below before. I didn't realise it have the ventral roll bar or two deflector dishes. Pretty cool.
User avatar
Nephtys
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 6227
Joined: 2005-04-02 10:54pm
Location: South Cali... where life is cheap!

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Nephtys »

That's from the 'Starfleet Battles' universe right? That SFC was based off of? They had some interesting designs for varying sizes of ships analogous to WW2 classes.

Also, since SFC was mentioned, obligatory lolmissilespam.
User avatar
Solauren
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10378
Joined: 2003-05-11 09:41pm

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Solauren »

Actually, for a while, there were CANON (unlike the video games) Federation, Klingon, et all Warships.

The FASA Star Trek Starship Tactical Combat Simulator was full of ships for various roles for Star Trek (pre TOS to Movie Period), and were, at the time of publication, right up until around season 2 of TNG, canon.

If you want to see some real Federation warships, go check them out.

Real Star Trek Warships

95% the old Canon FASA ships (he didn't post all of the D-7 variants). Anything TNG is non-Canon (within the game)

Maybe the nuTrek franchise will bring them back. I so want to see some of those designs beating the tar out of each other on screen.
I've been asked why I still follow a few of the people I know on Facebook with 'interesting political habits and view points'.

It's so when they comment on or approve of something, I know what pages to block/what not to vote for.
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Starglider »

Nephtys wrote:That's from the 'Starfleet Battles' universe right? That SFC was based off of? They had some interesting designs for varying sizes of ships analogous to WW2 classes.
The stats are, but the visual design isn't; the SFB ships are all TOS-based and frankly quite ugly (and bland, the alien ships are boring 'random geometric shape assemblies'). The SFC (1 and 2) Federation ships are based on the movie era styling (Enterprise/Reliant for the older ships and Excelsior-like for the newer ones), and the alien ships are original and for the most part quite nicely done. For example I love the configuration of the Romulan Firehawk class;

Image

Much better than the 'uglified TOS bird of prey' from SFB, but if you examine it closely, you can see the shape of the original in the central hull.
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Knife »

Meh, it has changed a lot over the years. I have an old fasa book and a lot of the designs are cool, those in the link aren't.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Stark »

What the fuck? The 'Missouri' (ps, LOLGASM) mega-oberth is a fucking retarded design. SUPAH PHASOZRRR! It's entirely designed by a) kitbashing and b) around the totally broken way SFB deals with weapons. The other one (which I think is DOUBLE LOLGASM called the Yamato) is much more a regular and not stupid ST design. The names pretty much tell you everything you need to know about the kind of fatty nerds who kitbashed them, though. Amusingly I think the smallest one (the FF) is the best original design, since I don't think the Akula is an SFB original.

I'm with Starglider on the Romulan ships though; I think they're the 'new era' Romulan ships or something, they look pretty boss. The kitbashed Klingon ships are LITERALLY 'bird of prey with giant nacelle' and 'D-7 with giant nacelle' and 'two d-7s with four giant nacelles'... but have utterly hilarious fanfiction attached to them.
User avatar
CaptHawkeye
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2939
Joined: 2007-03-04 06:52pm
Location: Korea.

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by CaptHawkeye »

Stark wrote:What the fuck? The 'Missouri' (ps, LOLGASM) mega-oberth is a fucking retarded design. SUPAH PHASOZRRR! It's entirely designed by a) kitbashing and b) around the totally broken way SFB deals with weapons. The other one (which I think is DOUBLE LOLGASM called the Yamato) is much more a regular and not stupid ST design. The names pretty much tell you everything you need to know about the kind of fatty nerds who kitbashed them, though. Amusingly I think the smallest one (the FF) is the best original design, since I don't think the Akula is an SFB original.
The FASA designs were always hit or miss but I still liked em for the most part. Remember that hilarous saucer/glued nacelles DD thing that obviously inspired USS Kelvin? :)

Oh man, I just remembered Klingon Academy had those fucking weird Federation "battleships" the not so subtely named "Missouri" and "Yamato" classes. FASA had so little to work with when they designed their RPG. I think the only ship classes the movies and series had shown were "Constitution" and "Miranda". :)
I'm with Starglider on the Romulan ships though; I think they're the 'new era' Romulan ships or something, they look pretty boss. The kitbashed Klingon ships are LITERALLY 'bird of prey with giant nacelle' and 'D-7 with giant nacelle' and 'two d-7s with four giant nacelles'... but have utterly hilarious fanfiction attached to them.
The designs I remember from Klingon Academy actually made me laugh because they seemed to copy only the outline of the D-7. After that they went out the way to glue on as many warp nacelles as possible. What's funny is that "new" Trek has lots of different in movie designs that could be extrapolated into diverse and interesting warship classes.

But that won't happen because fanboys have to invent their own cocked up homegrown stuff.
Best care anywhere.
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Starglider »

Stark wrote:What the fuck? The 'Missouri' (ps, LOLGASM) mega-oberth is a fucking retarded design. SUPAH PHASOZRRR! It's entirely designed by a) kitbashing and b) around the totally broken way SFB deals with weapons. The other one (which I think is DOUBLE LOLGASM called the Yamato) is much more a regular and not stupid ST design.
I think you've got them confused. The Missouri was only in Klingon Academy, and it had one assault phaser and one 'quantum carrier beam' (and a ton of phasers and photon torpedoes). The QCB was particularly idiotic and rules based in its effects. I had one brief go with this ship, and it was ridiculously slow, unmaneuverable and had an unbalanced weapons layout. Any points it gets for physical plausibility (of having the nacelles on short pylons, though even that is inconsistent with other Federation ships) are completely lost by having the idiotic inacessible Oberth-style engineering section.

The Yamato is in SFC1, SFC2 and KA. It has a pair of assault phasers and a sensible layout of normal weapons. The assault phasers are fine; they have a narrow arc and a ridiculous cooldown, and they're supposed to be for cracking starbase shields, which they do in fact work well for. The Ent-D had a cannon like this in All Good Things and all the new (canon) Klingon ships have giant disruptors, so this is hardly unrealistic. The placement of them on the Yamato is actually sensible, slung between the two warp cores and with exposed cooling fins. The Yamato is actually fun to play with because it's actually pretty fast and maneuverable for a battleship, though the hull is weak compared to a Klingon brick (which you'd expect, looking at it).

Amusingly someone has made a video of these two designs, and you have to admit, the Yamato looks way better.
The names pretty much tell you everything you need to know about the kind of fatty nerds who kitbashed them, though.
Are you talking about Solauren's links now? The two Federation BBs were made by developers at Interplay; while it may be true that most programmers are fatty nerds, I doubt they are any moreso than the ones in the Paramount art department.
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Stark »

Starglider wrote:I think you've got them confused. The Missouri was only in Klingon Academy, and it had one assault phaser and one 'quantum carrier beam' (and a ton of phasers and photon torpedoes). The QCB was particularly idiotic and rules based in its effects. I had one brief go with this ship, and it was ridiculously slow, unmaneuverable and had an unbalanced weapons layout. Any points it gets for physical plausibility (of having the nacelles on short pylons, though even that is inconsistent with other Federation ships) are completely lost by having the idiotic inacessible Oberth-style engineering section.

The Yamato is in SFC1, SFC2 and KA. It has a pair of assault phasers and a sensible layout of normal weapons. The assault phasers are fine; they have a narrow arc and a ridiculous cooldown, and they're supposed to be for cracking starbase shields, which they do in fact work well for. The Ent-D had a cannon like this in All Good Things and all the new (canon) Klingon ships have giant disruptors, so this is hardly unrealistic. The placement of them on the Yamato is actually sensible, slung between the two warp cores and with exposed cooling fins. The Yamato is actually fun to play with because it's actually pretty fast and maneuverable for a battleship, though the hull is weak compared to a Klingon brick (which you'd expect, looking at it).
Hah, yeah as I was posting I realised I couldn't actually remember which retarded name went with which wankship. Remember, the Federation stuff is ALWAYS BETTER. :)

I'm not even going to start on assault phasers (ps blow up your ship lol) since you think 'something superficially similar was in an episode hundred years later' means it's okay. ;) The Yamato having 2 (and the Feds having 2 battleship classes) is pretty much all you need to know about how horribly biased SFB was. The Klingon BB was so hopeless you could kill it in an Excelsior (although that's really down to the terrible damage model).
Are you talking about Solauren's links now? The two Federation BBs were made by developers at Interplay; while it may be true that most programmers are fatty nerds, I doubt they are any moreso than the ones in the Paramount art department.
Ha! I actually didn't know that (since they just stole so much from SFB) but the KA guys were clearly fatty nerds. Have you read the manual?

HOLY.

SHIT.
User avatar
CaptHawkeye
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2939
Joined: 2007-03-04 06:52pm
Location: Korea.

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by CaptHawkeye »

Stark wrote:Ha! I actually didn't know that (since they just stole so much from SFB) but the KA guys were clearly fatty nerds. Have you read the manual?

HOLY.

SHIT.
"The Warriors Anger class ship was designed by a man who got really angry at his captain for being a complete panzy and then kicked his ass and later blew up some ships. After this he designed an awesome ship inspired by his experience and named for his WARRIOR'S ANGER. He totally put lots of disruptors on it and gave it THREE torps cuz one was stuput. zomg zomg zomg"
Best care anywhere.
User avatar
Starglider
Miles Dyson
Posts: 8709
Joined: 2007-04-05 09:44pm
Location: Isle of Dogs
Contact:

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Starglider »

Stark wrote:Hah, yeah as I was posting I realised I couldn't actually remember which retarded name went with which wankship.
Or in fact most of the pertinent details.
Remember, the Federation stuff is ALWAYS BETTER. :)
Actually I always played the Romulans, given a chance, because their ships are tricky to use but simply superior when played properly (in SFC this is, which was fun multiplayer, KA wasn't, though not as hillariously awful and unplayable as Starfleet Academy was multiplayer).
I'm not even going to start on assault phasers (ps blow up your ship lol)
The assault phasers were only in KA, not the SFC games (I think, they weren't in the first one anyway, the second one had all kinds of crazy secondary weapons in it). As I recall they were pretty much useless against anything other than a station or another battleship, because the hit probability was so low on smaller targets.
since you think 'something superficially similar was in an episode hundred years later' means it's okay. ;)
It's clearly possible within canon Trek physics, what more do you want? Compared to a lot of the stuff invented for those games that's pretty good.
The Yamato having 2 (and the Feds having 2 battleship classes) is pretty much all you need to know about how horribly biased SFB was. The Klingon BB was so hopeless you could kill it in an Excelsior (although that's really down to the terrible damage model).
You're confusing KA, SFC and SFB again. In SFC, the Federation everyone has a single BB class except the Klingons, who get two (and the second one is an overgunned ubership, killable with the Romulan BB though given cunning play). KA is bizarrely the other way around, as you say the Klingons get one and the Feds get two, but remember the KA mechanics have very little connection to SFB. As for SFB itself, there have been so many ships published over the years all the major powers must have about ten battleship designs by now, albeit buried under hundreds of cruisers and frigates.
Have you read the manual? HOLY. SHIT.
Bleh. I think so. I vaguely recall it being more wanky and less plausible than the actually fairly decent ship fluff (given that it has to build on the main canon) in the SFC manual.

So you'll be following JonB's Let's Play avidly then? :)
User avatar
Jade Falcon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1705
Joined: 2004-07-27 06:22pm
Location: Jade Falcon HQ, Ayr, Scotland, UK
Contact:

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Jade Falcon »

The Klingon L-11 was funny though, a D-7 with one wing missing. :)

http://home.comcast.net/~ststcsolda/index.html

The Federation class Battleship if I remember right was basically the original Dreadnough concept that was seen in early non canon tech manuals.
Don't Move you're surrounded by Armed Bastards - Gene Hunt's attempt at Diplomacy

I will not make any deals with you. I've resigned. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own - Number 6

The very existence of flame-throwers proves that some time, somewhere, someone said to themselves, You know, I want to set those people over there on fire, but I'm just not close enough to get the job done.
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Patrick Degan »

You could toss out about half the FASA designs and not really miss them. Some of the most unimaginative and illogical kitbashes I've ever seen collected in one source.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
montypython
Jedi Master
Posts: 1130
Joined: 2004-11-30 03:08am

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by montypython »

The Proxima class battleships from ST: Legacy reminded me of the Yamato class at times.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Batman »

montypython wrote:The Proxima class battleships from ST: Legacy reminded me of the Yamato class at times.
Argh. That ship makes me think I need glasses.
And most of the FASA designs linked earlier are butt-ugly. Much as Trek may have failed in other areas, their ship designs mostly worked.
Well, most of them. Okay, the main ones.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Anguirus
Sith Marauder
Posts: 3702
Joined: 2005-09-11 02:36pm
Contact:

Re: A starfleet ship question

Post by Anguirus »

CaptHawkeye wrote:
Stark wrote:Ha! I actually didn't know that (since they just stole so much from SFB) but the KA guys were clearly fatty nerds. Have you read the manual?

HOLY.

SHIT.
"The Warriors Anger class ship was designed by a man who got really angry at his captain for being a complete panzy and then kicked his ass and later blew up some ships. After this he designed an awesome ship inspired by his experience and named for his WARRIOR'S ANGER. He totally put lots of disruptors on it and gave it THREE torps cuz one was stuput. zomg zomg zomg"
That manual was a really fun read when I was fourteen. :P
"I spit on metaphysics, sir."

"I pity the woman you marry." -Liberty

This is the guy they want to use to win over "young people?" Are they completely daft? I'd rather vote for a pile of shit than a Jesus freak social regressive.
Here's hoping that his political career goes down in flames and, hopefully, a hilarious gay sex scandal.
-Tanasinn
You can't expect sodomy to ruin every conservative politician in this country. -Battlehymn Republic
My blog, please check out and comment! http://decepticylon.blogspot.com
Post Reply