We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by MKSheppard »

Was the method of power conversion from M/AM reactions ever sufficiently explained in any Star Trek series?

I know that TOS was remarkably vague on the whole "warp engines make power" thing; but TNG and later trek series became ever more detailed in terms of treknobabble bullshit on the engines, and how power is delivered to every last widget on the ship by steam pipes highly explosive plasma conduits.

But how does the energy from the M/AM annihilation get converted to useable energy?
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Patrick Degan »

I think that the idea the writers picked up on was using the dilithium crystals as thermoelectric converters in the same manner as the RTG nuclear power packs being designed for satellites by General Electric in that time. Several of the TOS actors and writers were given a tour at a NASA facility (photos of which were printed in the Roddenberry/Whitfield book The Making Of Star Trek) and they might have become acquainted with the concept during that tour. Either that or Harvey Lynn passed the idea onto them.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by tim31 »

This is of course how they were able to re-energize the 'inferior' klingon mined crystals in TVH by firing radioactive particles at it.

"Hey Tom, the fire's going out! Shine a light on the coal so it'll kick-start again."
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Stark »

The TM makes a lot of noise about moving high-energy plasma around the whole ship to be converted into useful energy at the end, but I think the show only said 'plasma goes to warp drives which make SPEED when hit by PLASMA'. :)
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by tim31 »

The other part of it is the energy required to create an altered state of reality around the ship in order to travel faster than light. They did this of course by channelling that energy to 'field emitters'.

Now you know.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
Stark
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 36169
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:56pm
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Stark »

My favourite part is that the warp coils are just some crazy metal that creates warp fields when you spray plasma on them. :)
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by tim31 »

It actually starts to sound like the propulsion system of the Planet Express Ship; it remains stationary and moves the universe around it. This is apparently much more efficient than the opposite.
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by MKSheppard »

Patrick Degan wrote:I think that the idea the writers picked up on was using the dilithium crystals as thermoelectric converters in the same manner as the RTG nuclear power packs being designed for satellites by General Electric in that time.
That makes no sense. Thermoelectric converters have hideously low efficiencies. In TOS they seem to do the duty of both fuzes and power sources "we are on full crystal power", "all the power in the ship is going through five crystals *dim lights* "four now".
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Patrick Degan »

MKSheppard wrote:
Patrick Degan wrote:I think that the idea the writers picked up on was using the dilithium crystals as thermoelectric converters in the same manner as the RTG nuclear power packs being designed for satellites by General Electric in that time.
That makes no sense. Thermoelectric converters have hideously low efficiencies. In TOS they seem to do the duty of both fuzes and power sources "we are on full crystal power", "all the power in the ship is going through five crystals *dim lights* "four now".
Remember that we're talking about TV writers, not scientists. They would have simply heard "special crystals take heat from reactors and turn it into electrical power" and run with it, especially as it simplifies the ship's mechanics as well as the explanations. Also, you have to remember that in TOS' earliest season, they were still literally making the show up as they went along. They hadn't even decided whether the crystals or the matter/antimatter reactor was the heart of the Enterprise's power and there was a lot of confusion through several scripts as to what the lithium or dilithium crystals actually did. I don't think it was until season three that their ideas for the plan of the ship's power circuit had settled into a definitive set of ideas.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Simon_Jester »

If you're trying to analyze the problem scientifically, the real issue with a matter-antimatter reaction is converting energetic gamma rays (in the 500 keV to high MeV range) into a useful form of power. I think the "thermoelectric crystal" explanation is the best we're going to get in that case.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Abraxas
Redshirt
Posts: 4
Joined: 2009-12-06 07:20pm
Location: The best city in the best state in the best country on the best planet in the best solar system...

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Abraxas »

Stark wrote:My favourite part is that the warp coils are just some crazy metal that creates warp fields when you spray plasma on them. :)
I always thought it was similar to an electric current through a solenoid, inducing a magnetic field... except plasma through some exotic metal (I think the Daystrum Institute says it's a "yitterbium alloy" :roll: ) creates the (mysterious) warp field, which seperates the ship from real space. And as tim31 mentioned, "field emitters" compress space in front and expand space behind, allowing the ship to go faster then light.

It's soooo simple.

:banghead:

As for how annihilation is converted into power? I haven't the foggiest. Turbines, maybe?

:wink:
"The avalanche has started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote."
Ambassador Kosh

Image
User avatar
Crossroads Inc.
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9233
Joined: 2005-03-20 06:26pm
Location: Defending Sparkeling Bishonen
Contact:

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Crossroads Inc. »

I'm glad to see I am not the only one who ever thought of htis.. As a Kid watching the show, I knew enough about power and power generation wonder just WHAT they mean each time they talked about "Divert power from system Y to system X!" Or in one episode, some dumped "Power" from the phasers into a console during an emergency to get it to work, and Im left thinking "What power is it? How do the Phasers have power lying around??

The main thing I always wondered was what powered their ship... It's funny because As a kid I thought it simply COULDN"T Be electricity, because oyu only got electricity from turbines and generators.. Originally I thought, "Dose the AntiMatter reactor boil water? that turns Turbines? No that would be silly."

Iater one you have to assume that ship runs off "Electricity" because its the only thing the powers electronics... Off course form the show they make it seem that "Plasma" half the time is doing all the work.. And I don't know if in the WHOLE show anyone actually uses the word "Electricity" but simply "Power" or "Energy"
Praying is another way of doing nothing helpful
"Congratulations, you get a cookie. You almost got a fundamental English word correct." Pick
"Outlaw star has spaceships that punch eachother" Joviwan
Read "Tales From The Crossroads"!
Read "One Wrong Turn"!
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by McC »

Crossroads Inc. wrote:The main thing I always wondered was what powered their ship... It's funny because As a kid I thought it simply COULDN"T Be electricity, because oyu only got electricity from turbines and generators.. Originally I thought, "Dose the AntiMatter reactor boil water? that turns Turbines? No that would be silly."
This actually seems to be the intention in the new Star Trek movie, given Scotty's jaunt through enormous water conduits.
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Bounty »

McC wrote:
Crossroads Inc. wrote:The main thing I always wondered was what powered their ship... It's funny because As a kid I thought it simply COULDN"T Be electricity, because oyu only got electricity from turbines and generators.. Originally I thought, "Dose the AntiMatter reactor boil water? that turns Turbines? No that would be silly."
This actually seems to be the intention in the new Star Trek movie, given Scotty's jaunt through enormous water conduits.
The tubes are labelled "inert reactant"; they may just be (a derivative of) the "matter" part of a matter/antimatter reactor.

The turbine idea is pretty neat, though.
User avatar
Abraxas
Redshirt
Posts: 4
Joined: 2009-12-06 07:20pm
Location: The best city in the best state in the best country on the best planet in the best solar system...

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Abraxas »

McC wrote:
Crossroads Inc. wrote:The main thing I always wondered was what powered their ship... It's funny because As a kid I thought it simply COULDN"T Be electricity, because oyu only got electricity from turbines and generators.. Originally I thought, "Dose the AntiMatter reactor boil water? that turns Turbines? No that would be silly."
This actually seems to be the intention in the new Star Trek movie, given Scotty's jaunt through enormous water conduits.
I assumed it was cooling fluid...

If it really is water and the ship really uses turbines, they would need a crap load of water. You can make the future as efficient as you want, but you'd still need a ridiculous amount of feed water...
"The avalanche has started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote."
Ambassador Kosh

Image
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Patrick Degan »

The very idea of steam turbines on a spaceship is patently absurd, just from the mass penalty the machinery and its support infrastructure (including the aforementioned self-contained feed water circuit and tankage) would entail.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
tim31
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3388
Joined: 2006-10-18 03:32am
Location: Tasmania, Australia

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by tim31 »

Bounty wrote:The tubes are labelled "inert reactant"; they may just be (a derivative of) the "matter" part of a matter/antimatter reactor.
Seeing as in previously established canon it's deuterium, why can't it just be heavy water?
lol, opsec doesn't apply to fanfiction. -Aaron

PRFYNAFBTFC
CAPTAIN OF MFS SAMMY HAGAR
ImageImage
User avatar
McC
Rabid Monkey
Posts: 2775
Joined: 2004-01-11 02:47pm
Location: Southeastern MA, USA
Contact:

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by McC »

Patrick Degan wrote:The very idea of steam turbines on a spaceship is patently absurd, just from the mass penalty the machinery and its support infrastructure (including the aforementioned self-contained feed water circuit and tankage) would entail.
Is there another, better way to get power from a fission, fusion, or M/AM reactor? If so, why aren't we using that? Most SF seems to gloss over this, as the topic title suggests. I've seen plenty of "ah, this ship is powered by fusion" but almost no, "yes, and how are those energetic photons converted into electricity?"
-Ryan McClure-
Scaper - Browncoat - Warsie (semi-movie purist) - Colonial - TNG/DS9-era Trekker - Hero || BOTM - Maniac || Antireligious naturalist
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Serafina »

McC wrote: Is there another, better way to get power from a fission, fusion, or M/AM reactor? If so, why aren't we using that? Most SF seems to gloss over this, as the topic title suggests. I've seen plenty of "ah, this ship is powered by fusion" but almost no, "yes, and how are those energetic photons converted into electricity?"
Not that i know of - planned fusion reactors still use water to capture the released neutrons.

By the way - shouldn't photons be harder to capture with water than neutrons?
That would presumably make it harder to harness the released energy, possibly making an fusion reactor better suited for power generation - perhaps even more effective.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Bakustra
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2822
Joined: 2005-05-12 07:56pm
Location: Neptune Violon Tide!

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Bakustra »

McC wrote:
Patrick Degan wrote:The very idea of steam turbines on a spaceship is patently absurd, just from the mass penalty the machinery and its support infrastructure (including the aforementioned self-contained feed water circuit and tankage) would entail.
Is there another, better way to get power from a fission, fusion, or M/AM reactor? If so, why aren't we using that? Most SF seems to gloss over this, as the topic title suggests. I've seen plenty of "ah, this ship is powered by fusion" but almost no, "yes, and how are those energetic photons converted into electricity?"
One of these things is not like the other two. The majority of energy from a fission or fusion reactor is released in the form of neutrons or other particles of radioactivity, which release heat when absorbed by the shielding. So water absorbs infrared photons well enough, allowing the use of water steam to turn turbines. A M/AM reaction releases a great deal of gamma rays, which water does not absorb terribly effectively. While you could use water, making use of, say, molten lead to absorb the gamma radiation and transfer the heat would have the advantage of allowing you to combine the secondary/tertiary shielding (primary would be for pions and excess reactant, and probably magnetic) and the initial stage of the heat transfer system. Of course, further stages could still make use of water steam for heat transfer and cooling, and to turn turbines more efficiently than liquid lead would. This is without using any arbitrary supermaterials, of course.
Invited by the new age, the elegant Sailor Neptune!
I mean, how often am I to enter a game of riddles with the author, where they challenge me with some strange and confusing and distracting device, and I'm supposed to unravel it and go "I SEE WHAT YOU DID THERE" and take great personal satisfaction and pride in our mutual cleverness?
- The Handle, from the TVTropes Forums
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Patrick Degan »

McC wrote:
Patrick Degan wrote:The very idea of steam turbines on a spaceship is patently absurd, just from the mass penalty the machinery and its support infrastructure (including the aforementioned self-contained feed water circuit and tankage) would entail.
Is there another, better way to get power from a fission, fusion, or M/AM reactor? If so, why aren't we using that? Most SF seems to gloss over this, as the topic title suggests. I've seen plenty of "ah, this ship is powered by fusion" but almost no, "yes, and how are those energetic photons converted into electricity?"
IIRC, the plan for Project Daedelus involves collecting electrical power for the ship by running the fusion plasma through a series of electromagnetic coils.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Abraxas
Redshirt
Posts: 4
Joined: 2009-12-06 07:20pm
Location: The best city in the best state in the best country on the best planet in the best solar system...

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Abraxas »

McC wrote:
Patrick Degan wrote:The very idea of steam turbines on a spaceship is patently absurd, just from the mass penalty the machinery and its support infrastructure (including the aforementioned self-contained feed water circuit and tankage) would entail.
Is there another, better way to get power from a fission, fusion, or M/AM reactor? If so, why aren't we using that? Most SF seems to gloss over this, as the topic title suggests. I've seen plenty of "ah, this ship is powered by fusion" but almost no, "yes, and how are those energetic photons converted into electricity?"
Polywell Fusion. Spread the word.

It's coming to a planet near you!
"The avalanche has started, it is too late for the pebbles to vote."
Ambassador Kosh

Image
User avatar
Darth Wong
Sith Lord
Sith Lord
Posts: 70028
Joined: 2002-07-03 12:25am
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Darth Wong »

Abraxas wrote:
McC wrote:
Crossroads Inc. wrote:The main thing I always wondered was what powered their ship... It's funny because As a kid I thought it simply COULDN"T Be electricity, because oyu only got electricity from turbines and generators.. Originally I thought, "Dose the AntiMatter reactor boil water? that turns Turbines? No that would be silly."
This actually seems to be the intention in the new Star Trek movie, given Scotty's jaunt through enormous water conduits.
I assumed it was cooling fluid...
If it was cooling fluid, Scotty would have been boiled alive. Despite the superficial implication of the name, cooling fluids are actually hot; that's the whole point of them.
If it really is water and the ship really uses turbines, they would need a crap load of water. You can make the future as efficient as you want, but you'd still need a ridiculous amount of feed water...
It's entirely possible that the ship simply has an onboard plumbing system for showers and drinking water, and that's what he fell into.
Image
"It's not evil for God to do it. Or for someone to do it at God's command."- Jonathan Boyd on baby-killing

"you guys are fascinated with the use of those "rules of logic" to the extent that you don't really want to discussus anything."- GC

"I do not believe Russian Roulette is a stupid act" - Embracer of Darkness

"Viagra commercials appear to save lives" - tharkûn on US health care.

http://www.stardestroyer.net/Mike/RantMode/Blurbs.html
JointStrikeFighter
Worthless Trolling Palm-Fucker
Posts: 1979
Joined: 2004-06-12 03:09am
Location: Brisbane, Australia

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by JointStrikeFighter »

Darth Wong wrote:If it was cooling fluid, Scotty would have been boiled alive. Despite the superficial implication of the name, cooling fluids are actually hot; that's the whole point of them.
Assuming the ship uses closed cycle cooling and assuming he fell into the pipes after the hot stage and before the radiators. [disclaimer; haven't seen the movie]
User avatar
Bounty
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 10767
Joined: 2005-01-20 08:33am
Location: Belgium

Re: We have Matter meeting Antimatter, then ????? then POWER!

Post by Bounty »

It wasn't cooling fluid.

Image
Post Reply