OVEG - Flashback

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Mayabird
Storytime!
Posts: 5970
Joined: 2003-11-26 04:31pm
Location: IA > GA

OVEG - Flashback

Post by Mayabird »



Yay for Sulu. Not so yay for Voyager bits. Next week, Chuck overworks himself.

Chris O'Farrell, how many of these videos did you request?
DPDarkPrimus is my boyfriend!

SDNW4 Nation: The Refuge And, on Nova Terra, Al-Stan the Totally and Completely Honest and Legitimate Weapons Dealer and Used Starship Salesman slept on a bed made of money, with a blaster under his pillow and his sombrero pulled over his face. This is to say, he slept very well indeed.
User avatar
Ghost Rider
Spirit of Vengeance
Posts: 27779
Joined: 2002-09-24 01:48pm
Location: DC...looking up from the gutters to the stars

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Ghost Rider »

This is a decent review of Chuck's and I do understand a bit of the exasperation in Chuck's voice. This type of episode is why Braga is such a fuck up that the whole episode is a mess of continuity and technobabble and the lack of basic knowledge of any and everything (More heat speeds up cooking!). And the rating at the end reminds me that these are in context of the show, how piss poor Voyager was.

After watching reviews like this and thinking about the episodes there are days I am not amazed Star Trek lurched like some dying sloth towards the inevitable we had in the newest movie.
MM /CF/WG/BOTM/JL/Original Warsie/ACPATHNTDWATGODW FOREVER!!

Sometimes we can choose the path we follow. Sometimes our choices are made for us. And sometimes we have no choice at all

Saying and doing are chocolate and concrete
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11948
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Crazedwraith »

Hmm. This has been a full length text review as well hasn't? Certainly most of the stuff Chuck was saying was familiar from that.
User avatar
Chris OFarrell
Durandal's Bitch
Posts: 5724
Joined: 2002-08-02 07:57pm
Contact:

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Chris OFarrell »

Mayabird wrote:
Yay for Sulu. Not so yay for Voyager bits. Next week, Chuck overworks himself.

Chris O'Farrell, how many of these videos did you request?
Just these 3, as I thought they would work best by far as a set.

There were a lot of other episodes I would have been more then happy for Chuck to look at, but given how overloaded he is anyway, I thought I'd hold off for a while.

And people, remember that scores are RELATIVE to the series. Its not that Flashback got a 7/10 and DS9 got 9/10, boosted to 10/10 and can be directly compared, a 7/10 is probably worth a 4/10 in DS9 terms :D
Image
OsirisLord
Youngling
Posts: 99
Joined: 2009-01-31 05:37pm

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by OsirisLord »

One of these days Braga has to stumble his way into a biology textbook and learn what the word "virus" actually means.

I do like the sort of bookends with Voyager finding a gaseous anomaly while the Excelsior was out studying gaseous anomalies.

And while Chuck does bash Neelix for thinking that by adding more power to something it will go better, I would like to point out that that has been a standard Trek solution to everything since forever.

"Captain are engines aren't going fast enough!"
"Scotty, more power to the engines!"

"Captain, our shields aren't strong enough!"
"Mr. LaForge, more power to shields."
Hell, dividing your ship's power between engines, shields, and weapons was a gameplay mechanic in Star Trek Online (and a pretty good one) where you could sacrifice your ship's speed for firepower or durability, or divert maximum power to your engines and escape a battle that's gone badly.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Uraniun235 »

OsirisLord wrote: Hell, dividing your ship's power between engines, shields, and weapons was a gameplay mechanic in Star Trek Online (and a pretty good one) where you could sacrifice your ship's speed for firepower or durability, or divert maximum power to your engines and escape a battle that's gone badly.
This has existed since basically forever and has been employed in many games.
"There is no "taboo" on using nuclear weapons." -Julhelm
Image
What is Project Zohar?
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
User avatar
Marcus Aurelius
Jedi Master
Posts: 1361
Joined: 2008-09-14 02:36pm
Location: Finland

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Marcus Aurelius »

Uraniun235 wrote:
OsirisLord wrote: Hell, dividing your ship's power between engines, shields, and weapons was a gameplay mechanic in Star Trek Online (and a pretty good one) where you could sacrifice your ship's speed for firepower or durability, or divert maximum power to your engines and escape a battle that's gone badly.
This has existed since basically forever and has been employed in many games.
First full fledged implementation of that idea was probably X-Wing (1993), if I remember correctly. The early Wing Commanders had something similar, but not quite up to the level X-Wing had, although me recollection of them is really hazy.
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Serafina »

Of course, more power to the engines=more speed actually makes some sense. As in "it could work if there is only that much power, but every component can use much more than it normally receives", which is of course a sound possibility from an engineering POV (they can only build warp cores that are that good, but they can build better engines, shields etc.). And of course, we have real-life engines that produce more power when you add more energy (well, more or less like that).

Compare that to cooking: Yes, you get the job done quicker - and you absolutely ruin the flavor. Everyone who EVER cooked should know that. But then again, i think it fits Neelix character perfectly to not know basic things about life.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
User avatar
Terralthra
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 4741
Joined: 2007-10-05 09:55pm
Location: San Francisco, California, United States

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Terralthra »

Marcus Aurelius wrote:
Uraniun235 wrote:
OsirisLord wrote: Hell, dividing your ship's power between engines, shields, and weapons was a gameplay mechanic in Star Trek Online (and a pretty good one) where you could sacrifice your ship's speed for firepower or durability, or divert maximum power to your engines and escape a battle that's gone badly.
This has existed since basically forever and has been employed in many games.
First full fledged implementation of that idea was probably X-Wing (1993), if I remember correctly. The early Wing Commanders had something similar, but not quite up to the level X-Wing had, although me recollection of them is really hazy.
Diverting power from one thing to another didn't occur until Wing Commander III, I believe. I and II had slowly recharging levels of guns and shields, while armor/afterburner fuel were used up and never refilled in a mission.
User avatar
Skylon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1657
Joined: 2005-01-12 04:55pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Skylon »

7 was pretty damn generous for this episode. I was expecting 5 or 6.

I loved the observation about how Nog essentially leaped over Harry Kim in rank though. Harry sucks that much. :lol:

Edit: Chuck's reviewing B5 episodes? Awesome!
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge

"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)

"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
User avatar
Patrick Degan
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 14847
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:06am
Location: Orleanian in exile

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Patrick Degan »

I absolutely fucking hated this episode. I saw it as Brannon Braga gleefully shitting all over TOS, then rubbing our faces in it. Of course, that was before Boobyprise was inflicted on us. DS9's "Trials And Tribbleations" was goofy but a far better tribute episode to the original series without which the TNG franchise would never have existed.
When ballots have fairly and constitutionally decided, there can be no successful appeal back to bullets.
—Abraham Lincoln

People pray so that God won't crush them like bugs.
—Dr. Gregory House

Oil an emergency?! It's about time, Brigadier, that the leaders of this planet of yours realised that to remain dependent upon a mineral slime simply doesn't make sense.
—The Doctor "Terror Of The Zygons" (1975)
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Big Orange »

I don't hate "Flashback" as such, but I'm also surprised at the relatively high 7/10 rating for a OK-ish episode (I prefered "Body & Soul") that felt a little off - it jarred with TOS in a similar manner that the Kirk flashbacks did in Generations, didn't it? By having TOS era characters sprouting out TNG style technobabble.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Stofsk »

I hated 'Flashback' because it made me realise I would rather they had made a show called Excelsior with Captain Sulu gallivanting around the galaxy with a crew of intrepid youngsters rather than a show called Voyager with Captain Janeway gallivanting around the galaxy with a crew of intrepid youngsters.
Image
User avatar
JME2
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12258
Joined: 2003-02-02 04:04pm

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by JME2 »

Stofsk wrote:I hated 'Flashback' because it made me realise I would rather they had made a show called Excelsior with Captain Sulu gallivanting around the galaxy with a crew of intrepid youngsters rather than a show called Voyager with Captain Janeway gallivanting around the galaxy with a crew of intrepid youngsters.
Likewise. I'm still hoping for an ongoing novel series focused on Sulu's tenure as Excelsior's captain rather than the occasional installment.
User avatar
Big Orange
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7108
Joined: 2006-04-22 05:15pm
Location: Britain

Re: OVEG - Flashback

Post by Big Orange »

Although Captain Sulu was likable and fairly in character in "Flashback", and I'm a big fan of the USS Excelsior design, I'm with Destructionator XIII that George Takei at the time just didn't seem to have the chops as a leading character in "Flashback" and he seemed a bit too OTT to carry a show like even Mulgrew or Bakula did, although that could've been down to the episode directing.

And what was with the arbitary plot device with the so-called mind virus? Although the goofy idea seems more palatable if that "mind virus" depicting a falling girl is seen as more akin to a computer virus than a virus, virus. Tuvok's memories are "software" and his brain "hardware", with the falling girl "mind virus" blending into his mind like a real memory (like the Antimalware Doctor virus blends in as real looking anti-virus software) but is a malignant foreign presence.
'Alright guard, begin the unnecessarily slow moving dipping mechanism...' - Dr. Evil

'Secondly, I don't see why "income inequality" is a bad thing. Poverty is not an injustice. There is no such thing as causes for poverty, only causes for wealth. Poverty is not a wrong, but taking money from those who have it to equalize incomes is basically theft, which is wrong.' - Typical Randroid

'I think it's gone a little bit wrong.' - The Doctor
Post Reply