What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Baffalo »

I sometimes wonder, was there a golden age to the Federation as seen in the shows? I mean, I figure that post-Borg, the Federation was no longer in a golden age, and Enterprise... yeah, we won't go there. So I'm wondering, was the Federation in a golden age in TOS? TNG? Both? Neither? Opinions please :)
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Stofsk »

TNG, pre-Borg. Relations with the Klingons were good, the Romulans weren't being pests, and things were good in the core worlds - no war, no famine, no poverty. Even post-Borg things were good, it only begins to get grim around late-DS9, with the Dominion War.
Image
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Knife »

I would actually say the Golden era were the unseen years between TOS and TNG. Somewhere in there the Feds made peace with the Klingons, the Romulans retreated into their teritory, the Federation expanded dramatically, new ships and tech were made and larger sizes of ships representing that were made. The military faction of Starfleet decreased indicating less war and strife.

Yeah, the early 24th century sounds like a good point to say the 'Golden Age' of the Federation.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Stofsk »

The Romulans had retreated behind their territory, but relations with the Klingons were up and down during that period - with a particular low point around the time of the Narendra III incident where the Enterprise-C sacrificed herself to defend the Klingon colony. After that point, the Klingons and Federation relations improved.

I agree with your other points.
Image
lord Martiya
Jedi Master
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2007-08-29 11:52am

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by lord Martiya »

The period between the Khitomer conference and the Tomed Incident: relations with the Klingons were relatively friendly and the empire was in no ability capable to threath the Federation, and the Romulan Empire was a true ally (see where the Romulan ambassador to the Federation first appears and find me another explanation that makes sense). After Tomed (or immediately before) the Romulans went neutral at best and relations with the Klingon started becoming more shaky.
Crazedwraith
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11948
Joined: 2003-04-10 03:45pm
Location: Cheshire, England

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Crazedwraith »

I assume you are referring to the Romulan Ambassador being present at Colonel West's briefing in STVI? Note that he is also a member of the conspiracy. So not that good an ally.
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by RedImperator »

The President certainly wasn't in on it, though, and he still allowed the Romulan ambassador to sit in on a briefing about a potential military operation in Klingon territory. That seems to indicate the Romulans and the Federation were on pretty good terms at the time.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Baffalo »

RedImperator wrote:The President certainly wasn't in on it, though, and he still allowed the Romulan ambassador to sit in on a briefing about a potential military operation in Klingon territory. That seems to indicate the Romulans and the Federation were on pretty good terms at the time.
Yes but it could also be a case of "We might suddenly find ourselves in a war and we'd rather you know what's going on before you hear about it on the news". The Federation was about to be using military force near the Klingon border and maybe even close to the Romulan border, and by telling the Romulans what's going on, the Romulans won't freak out and assume the Federation is about to attack.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
RedImperator
Roosevelt Republican
Posts: 16465
Joined: 2002-07-11 07:59pm
Location: Delaware
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by RedImperator »

Baffalo wrote:
RedImperator wrote:The President certainly wasn't in on it, though, and he still allowed the Romulan ambassador to sit in on a briefing about a potential military operation in Klingon territory. That seems to indicate the Romulans and the Federation were on pretty good terms at the time.
Yes but it could also be a case of "We might suddenly find ourselves in a war and we'd rather you know what's going on before you hear about it on the news". The Federation was about to be using military force near the Klingon border and maybe even close to the Romulan border, and by telling the Romulans what's going on, the Romulans won't freak out and assume the Federation is about to attack.
You can accomplish that without letting the Romulan ambassador sit in on the fucking briefing. That'd be like Bush inviting the Syrian ambassador to sit in on war planning meetings so he'd know we planned to bomb Iraq.
Image
Any city gets what it admires, will pay for, and, ultimately, deserves…We want and deserve tin-can architecture in a tinhorn culture. And we will probably be judged not by the monuments we build but by those we have destroyed.--Ada Louise Huxtable, "Farewell to Penn Station", New York Times editorial, 30 October 1963
X-Ray Blues
lord Martiya
Jedi Master
Posts: 1126
Joined: 2007-08-29 11:52am

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by lord Martiya »

It's a long time since I last watched the movie, but weren't Romulan ships included in the plan?
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Baffalo »

lord Martiya wrote:It's a long time since I last watched the movie, but weren't Romulan ships included in the plan?
No, Operation Retrieve (Brilliant naming btw) was only going to use Federation ships from Starbase 24 to enter Klingon territory and rescue Kirk and McCoy from Rura Pente. The plan was vetoed by the president. No mention is made of Romulan forces, and from the images made available:

ImageImage
Image

I see no evidence of Romulans being involved.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
Skylon
Jedi Council Member
Posts: 1657
Joined: 2005-01-12 04:55pm
Location: New York
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Skylon »

Stofsk wrote:The Romulans had retreated behind their territory, but relations with the Klingons were up and down during that period - with a particular low point around the time of the Narendra III incident where the Enterprise-C sacrificed herself to defend the Klingon colony. After that point, the Klingons and Federation relations improved.

I agree with your other points.
There a couple other rough patches, such as war with the Cardassians and the Tzenkethi. I'm more inclined towards your original assessment, of early TNG and maybe a decade or so beforehand too.
-A.L.
"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence...Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent. The slogan 'press on' has solved and always will solve the problems of the human race." - Calvin Coolidge

"If you're falling off a cliff you may as well try to fly, you've got nothing to lose." - John Sheridan (Babylon 5)

"Sometimes you got to roll the hard six." - William Adama (Battlestar Galactica)
User avatar
Knife
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 15769
Joined: 2002-08-30 02:40pm
Location: Behind the Zion Curtain

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Knife »

Skylon wrote:
Stofsk wrote:The Romulans had retreated behind their territory, but relations with the Klingons were up and down during that period - with a particular low point around the time of the Narendra III incident where the Enterprise-C sacrificed herself to defend the Klingon colony. After that point, the Klingons and Federation relations improved.

I agree with your other points.
There a couple other rough patches, such as war with the Cardassians and the Tzenkethi. I'm more inclined towards your original assessment, of early TNG and maybe a decade or so beforehand too.
The war with Cardassia was a decade before TNG.
They say, "the tree of liberty must be watered with the blood of tyrants and patriots." I suppose it never occurred to them that they are the tyrants, not the patriots. Those weapons are not being used to fight some kind of tyranny; they are bringing them to an event where people are getting together to talk. -Mike Wong

But as far as board culture in general, I do think that young male overaggression is a contributing factor to the general atmosphere of hostility. It's not SOS and the Mess throwing hand grenades all over the forum- Red
User avatar
Stravo
Official SD.Net Teller of Tales
Posts: 12806
Joined: 2002-07-08 12:06pm
Location: NYC

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Stravo »

I don't know, you could argue that the Federation will be entering a Golden Age post Dominion War. They have defeated the greatest military threat the Federation has ever encountered and though battered and bruised have come out the stronger for it especially in light of the fate of its allies - The Klingons are bloodied and suffered some of the heaviest casaulties in the war - particularly as it neared the end with Gawlron's horrible war planning during the 2 week period the Klingons faced the Dominion-Breen alliance alone.

The Cardassians are finished as a power, capital world devastated, under enemy occupation and fleets decimated.

Romulans are in better shape overall as they probably suffered the lightest casualties coming into the war late but in Nemesis we see that politically they are ruined as their senate is killed by an uprising from their slave race so the Romulans will probably be politically unstable for some time.

Out of all the Alpha Quadrant powers the Federation is the most stable politically, economically and militarily. No one will be able to directly challenge her either due to their inability or because of the political good will generated by the Alliance.

Which leads to an interesting point of whether the Federation will try to build consensus - as is their forte and leverage the military alliance against the Dominion into something more lasting like a long term Alliance of the major Alpha Quadrant powers. If they succeed that would by definition be something that the Federation would view as their greatest achievement. A quadrant alliance that would be nearly unassailable and properous.

So as gloomy as the DS9 ending was we may be looking at the seeds of their upcoming Golden Age under the right circumstances.
Wherever you go, there you are.

Ripped Shirt Monkey - BOTMWriter's Guild Cybertron's Finest Justice League
This updated sig brought to you by JME2
Image
JasonB
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 136
Joined: 2011-03-23 10:31pm

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by JasonB »

I say after Star Terk Nemesis UFP no longer at war Romulan Star Empire and face no known military power threaten it.
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Baffalo »

JasonB wrote:I say after Star Terk Nemesis UFP no longer at war Romulan Star Empire and face no known military power threaten it.
What the fuck?

The Federation wasn't at war with the Romulan Star Empire, and they had plenty of threats to worry about. The entire Dominion War was fought in the alpha quadrant except for a few skirmishes in the Gamma Quadrant, the Borg are still lurking around somewhere, and JANEWAY is a fucking ADMIRAL! Everyone in Starfleet is going to die a horrible, horrible death.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by FaxModem1 »

Should we accept the Star Trek novel EU in this? Because a couple years after Nemesis we have a Romulan civil war, a complete invasion by the Borg and then a new cold war with the Typhon Pact.
Image
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9774
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Steve »

There's at least two post-TNG continuities now, since STO has established it's own that borrows from but doesn't follow the novel EU... but neither show the UFP entering a glorious new Golden Age of peace and prosperity.
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Steve wrote:There's at least two post-TNG continuities now, since STO has established it's own that borrows from but doesn't follow the novel EU... but neither show the UFP entering a glorious new Golden Age of peace and prosperity.
And neither are canon.

Also, Baffalo, Voyager's finale suggests that the Borg are gone.
User avatar
Steve
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 9774
Joined: 2002-07-03 01:09pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by Steve »

Apparently neither STO nor the novel EU took that tack. Too many writers looking to write the ULTIMATE THREAT and such, I imagine. Well, with STO it's understandable at least, the Borg make for an intimidating and appropriate end-game content opponent (as well as a "are you shitting me, I have to fight them?!" effect for the game tutorial missions).
”A Radical is a man with both feet planted firmly in the air.” – Franklin Delano Roosevelt

"No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism." - Sir Winston L. S. Churchill, Princips Britannia

American Conservatism is about the exercise of personal responsibility without state interference in the lives of the citizenry..... unless, of course, it involves using the bludgeon of state power to suppress things Conservatives do not like.

DONALD J. TRUMP IS A SEDITIOUS TRAITOR AND MUST BE IMPEACHED
User avatar
FaxModem1
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 7700
Joined: 2002-10-30 06:40pm
Location: In a dark reflection of a better world

Re: What would you define as the Federation's Golden Age?

Post by FaxModem1 »

Yeah, its odd, but I rather enjoyed the relaunch TNG novels like Death in Winter, Q&A, etc.. Where they're just exploring the galaxy and having wacky adventure than, oh look, another Borg attack, another war.
Image
Post Reply