Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

JasonB
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 136
Joined: 2011-03-23 10:31pm

Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by JasonB »

In practice UFP gravitate torpedoes strength need blow smell world accord smell planet.

What this video form 11 minute and 14 seconds to about 11 minute and 26 seconds

Across that only one example another tricobalt device again another example weapon we never seen the UFP us other then USS Voyager once.
Across anti matter pod every starship carry why that not normal used weapon is beyond me can someone here please explain.
User avatar
Batman
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 16429
Joined: 2002-07-09 04:51am
Location: Seriously thinking about moving to Marvel because so much of the DCEU stinks

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Batman »

Because depla prufogle qwofty means they can't as tropl snorly transmopulism?
And I positively fail to see how a planet being smelly or not figures into it.
'Next time I let Superman take charge, just hit me. Real hard.'
'You're a princess from a society of immortal warriors. I'm a rich kid with issues. Lots of issues.'
'No. No dating for the Batman. It might cut into your brooding time.'
'Tactically we have multiple objectives. So we need to split into teams.'-'Dibs on the Amazon!'
'Hey, we both have a Martian's phone number on our speed dial. I think I deserve the benefit of the doubt.'
'You know, for a guy with like 50 different kinds of vision, you sure are blind.'
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Enigma »

Another fucked up idea. Tricobalt devices? They can disrupt subspace and that is a no-no.

Do you really want to have Starfleet strand their ships by tossing their fuel pods and destroying subspace while attacking their enemies?
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
The Romulan Republic
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 21559
Joined: 2008-10-15 01:37am

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by The Romulan Republic »

Enigma wrote:Another fucked up idea. Tricobalt devices? They can disrupt subspace and that is a no-no.

Do you really want to have Starfleet strand their ships by tossing their fuel pods and destroying subspace while attacking their enemies?
Is it just me, or do a lot of this guy's ideas seem to be borderline suicide attacks?

However, I will point out that tricobalt devices have been used in canon without destroying subspace. Maybe if they were used in large numbers though...
User avatar
Jawawithagun
Jedi Master
Posts: 1141
Joined: 2002-10-10 07:05pm
Location: Terra Secunda

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Jawawithagun »

JasonB wrote:In practice UFP gravitate torpedoes strength need blow smell world accord smell planet.
Just cutting off their noses would be easier but someone removed the slice-n-dice mode from the phasers again.
"I said two shot to the head, not three." (Anonymous wiretap, Dallas, TX, 11/25/63)

Only one way to make a ferret let go of your nose - stick a fag up its arse!

there is no god - there is no devil - there is no heaven - there is no hell
live with it
- Lazarus Long
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Enigma »

The Romulan Republic wrote:
Enigma wrote:Another fucked up idea. Tricobalt devices? They can disrupt subspace and that is a no-no.

Do you really want to have Starfleet strand their ships by tossing their fuel pods and destroying subspace while attacking their enemies?
Is it just me, or do a lot of this guy's ideas seem to be borderline suicide attacks?

However, I will point out that tricobalt devices have been used in canon without destroying subspace. Maybe if they were used in large numbers though...
It can cause subspace ruptures but it isn't classified as a subspace weapon. But to lob them like photorps would greatly increase the risks of rupturing subspace.
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Jedi Master
Posts: 1082
Joined: 2011-01-16 08:48pm

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Darth Tedious »

Wasn't the whole 'small planet' thing hyperbole anyway? I'm sure this has come up several hundred times...
"Darth Tedious just showed why women can go anywhere they want because they are, in effect, mobile kitchens." - RazorOutlaw

"That could never happen because super computers." - Stark

"Don't go there girl! Talk to the VTOL cause the glass canopy ain't listening!" - Shroomy
User avatar
Serafina
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5246
Joined: 2009-01-07 05:37pm
Location: Germany

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Serafina »

Darth Tedious wrote:Wasn't the whole 'small planet' thing hyperbole anyway? I'm sure this has come up several hundred times...
"what is she planning to do? blow up a small planet?" (or was it moon?)
Compare that to, say, someone hoarding lot's of ammo and someone else saying "what is he planning to do, take out a whole army?"
Yes, it is clearly hyperbole.
SoS:NBA GALE Force
"Destiny and fate are for those too weak to forge their own futures. Where we are 'supposed' to be is irrelevent." - Sir Nitram
"The world owes you nothing but painful lessons" - CaptainChewbacca
"The mark of the immature man is that he wants to die nobly for a cause, while the mark of a mature man is that he wants to live humbly for one." - Wilhelm Stekel
"In 1969 it was easier to send a man to the Moon than to have the public accept a homosexual" - Broomstick

Divine Administration - of Gods and Bureaucracy (Worm/Exalted)
JasonB
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 136
Joined: 2011-03-23 10:31pm

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by JasonB »

You guys right According Star Trek alpha 25 isoton is enough take city because twice that amount enough take out 2 cities I guess. How come UFP does not normal armed photon torpedoes with 80 insoton punch.
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Metahive »

Do you think "iso" ton is more than "mega" ton? Do you know what "iso" actually means?
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Obvious Answer: The Federation has mastered the Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator, thereby giving them the means to blow up planets.
User avatar
Eternal_Freedom
Castellan
Posts: 10413
Joined: 2010-03-09 02:16pm
Location: CIC, Battlestar Temeraire

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Eternal_Freedom »

Damnit Connor beat me to it. Grrrrrrrr.

Clearly that small planet Kim refers to is spoiling Janeway's view of something.
Baltar: "I don't want to miss a moment of the last Battlestar's destruction!"
Centurion: "Sir, I really think you should look at the other Battlestar."
Baltar: "What are you babbling about other...it's impossible!"
Centurion: "No. It is a Battlestar."

Corrax Entry 7:17: So you walk eternally through the shadow realms, standing against evil where all others falter. May your thirst for retribution never quench, may the blood on your sword never dry, and may we never need you again.
User avatar
Ahriman238
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4854
Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
Location: Ocularis Terribus.

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Ahriman238 »

Do you think "iso" ton is more than "mega" ton? Do you know what "iso" actually means?


International Standardization Organization? Perhaps Janeway is getting ready for a management-practices review. Ah, but there simply isn't a big enough warhead to save her.

But if this is supposed to be Greek iso then it means "equal to." So clearly the special super-torpedo they're making is equivalent to eighty tons of TNT. Fairly impressive, to get such a small non-nuclear bomb with such a yield. Fairly unimpressive in absolute terms.

Is this what I missed by barely ever watching Voyager? Bad techno-babble and contrived plots? And are we seriosuly expected to believe that Federation Starships will just lock out the crew because of a single unconfirmed sensor reading? And that only the captain can override this? Because that just screams "easily exploitable weakness" to anyone from the Romulans/Borg/Dominon to a man who wants to bust out of jail without the nearby starship interfering.

The whole idea of a Captain's Only, conspiracy/club shits all over the ideals of TOS and TNG. Every Starfleet Officer, down to the mess hall steward is the product of an advanced liberal arts education that includes everything from classical studies to warp theory to klingon opera, and Starfleet trusts it's officers implicitly.
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud
User avatar
Stofsk
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 12925
Joined: 2003-11-10 12:36am

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Stofsk »

Ahriman238 wrote:Is this what I missed by barely ever watching Voyager? Bad techno-babble and contrived plots?
Yeah. Pretty much.
Image
User avatar
Metahive
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2795
Joined: 2010-09-02 09:08am
Location: Little Korea in Big Germany

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Metahive »

Even funnier there's actually something called "isoton", it's a special moniker for certain nuclides (two nuclides with same number of neutrons but diverging numbers of protons). There's also "isotonic" which is a word pertaining to muscle contraction. SCIENCE, ur doin it rong!
People at birth are naturally good. Their natures are similar, but their habits make them different from each other.
-Sanzi Jing (Three Character Classic)

Saddam’s crime was so bad we literally spent decades looking for our dropped monocles before we could harumph up the gumption to address it
-User Indigo Jump on Pharyngula

O God, please don't let me die today, tomorrow would be so much better!
-Traditional Spathi morning prayer
User avatar
Connor MacLeod
Sith Apprentice
Posts: 14065
Joined: 2002-08-01 05:03pm
Contact:

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Connor MacLeod »

Destructionator XIII wrote:Not only do you not know what iso means, you don't know what ton means! Taking a number as an absolute thing is super silly.
Clearly iso means ton, which is a ton of Illudium Q-36 explosive space modulator. Considering that one stick weighs what, a pound? one Isoton is enough to blow up the world 5000x over.

EAT THAT SUPER ANTIMATTTER!!!!!
User avatar
Darth Tedious
Jedi Master
Posts: 1082
Joined: 2011-01-16 08:48pm

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Darth Tedious »

I was wondering how long it would take before someone mentioned the ounce of antimatter...
"Darth Tedious just showed why women can go anywhere they want because they are, in effect, mobile kitchens." - RazorOutlaw

"That could never happen because super computers." - Stark

"Don't go there girl! Talk to the VTOL cause the glass canopy ain't listening!" - Shroomy
User avatar
Ahriman238
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4854
Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
Location: Ocularis Terribus.

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Ahriman238 »

Saw the episode, am even more sickened.

The sheer, arrogant conceit of it all leaves me stunned. The Federation failed to control the omega particle in it's one and only set of experiments THEREFORE no one can control the particle. The particle can disrupt Warp travel THEREFORE it is a threat to all civilization because as we all know, civilization cannot exist without interstellar travel and there is no form of FTL besides Warp Drive (hint: there is.) Combine these two facts and you have a mandate to destroy the things at any cost, up to and including dooming an entire civilization.

How can any of this be morally or logically justified? I was going to ask how any of this adds up to being so sensitive it can't be shared even with fellow officers, but I think I understand now. It's a conspiracy, and like many conspiracies, they are afraid that their objectives will be discovered by someone with a working moral compass and/or brain.
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud
JasonB
Retarded Spambot
Posts: 136
Joined: 2011-03-23 10:31pm

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by JasonB »

Metahive wrote:Do you think "iso" ton is more than "mega" ton? Do you know what "iso" actually means?
The reason I think photon torpedo armed with 25 inston enough fire power destroy city is because of the them talking about Star Terk living whiteness this photon torpedo destroy city seconds . However for all we known he talking type ten photon torpedo most powerful one seen get used that heard them talking about or and one we never heard get used. As for other one we know even less not even stander warhead being used.
See site for yourself for information what isoton means why think enough fire power destroy smell city seconds witness.

http://memory-alpha.org/wiki/Isoton
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Simon_Jester »

Ahriman238 wrote:Saw the episode, am even more sickened.

The sheer, arrogant conceit of it all leaves me stunned. The Federation failed to control the omega particle in it's one and only set of experiments THEREFORE no one can control the particle. The particle can disrupt Warp travel THEREFORE it is a threat to all civilization because as we all know, civilization cannot exist without interstellar travel and there is no form of FTL besides Warp Drive (hint: there is.) Combine these two facts and you have a mandate to destroy the things at any cost, up to and including dooming an entire civilization.

How can any of this be morally or logically justified? I was going to ask how any of this adds up to being so sensitive it can't be shared even with fellow officers, but I think I understand now. It's a conspiracy, and like many conspiracies, they are afraid that their objectives will be discovered by someone with a working moral compass and/or brain.
To be fair, I can understand how the conspiracy to destroy Omega particles/molecules/whatever originated. A high-profile technological disaster of that scale is enough to convince an interstellar civilization that the things are far more dangerous than they're worth. And the Federation really would fall apart without warp travel, and many of the worlds they've settled would not have much long term viability without the Federation's warp-drive ships knitting them together. And warp drive is used so routinely, by so many different cultures, that anything which threatens to close it off is a disaster- and not just to the Federation.

While I'm not on board with destroying whole civilizations to get at the Omega molecules, the history of the things is full of research and industrial accidents, even by people who think they have the stuff under control. It is not unreasonable for the Federation to regard experiments with the Omega molecule anywhere near its space as a dangerous and provocative act- much like it would be dangerous and provocative to test "dirty" nuclear weapons upwind of another country that could be affected by the fallout.

So up to a point, I cannot criticize a conspiracy to prevent Omega technology from spreading; it really is that dangerous.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Enigma »

There is no defined comparison between isoton and whatever real world unit but we can extrapolate at least for anti-matter.

The memory alpha link mentions that the photon torpedo's maximum yield is between 25 and 200 isotons (huge gap, go figure :roll: ).

Let's use the TM and have the photorp's yield at 64.4MT. 64.4 divided by 25 gives us an upper end of 2.576MT per isoton. At the lower end, 64.4MT divided by 200 isotons gives us 322KT per isoton.

In the case of anti-matter, isoton is just a different way of measuring its yield. This makes no sense since they've also used the Metric system.

Apparently, a few isograms of dilithium is barely enough to power Voyager's sonic showers. That means it uses somewhere around 6.74GW to 54GW of power to run them. That also doesn't seem to make sense as this would mean that they use a shit-ton of power just to keep people clean.
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
Ahriman238
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4854
Joined: 2011-04-22 11:04pm
Location: Ocularis Terribus.

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Ahriman238 »

To be fair, I can understand how the conspiracy to destroy Omega particles/molecules/whatever originated. A high-profile technological disaster of that scale is enough to convince an interstellar civilization that the things are far more dangerous than they're worth. And the Federation really would fall apart without warp travel, and many of the worlds they've settled would not have much long term viability without the Federation's warp-drive ships knitting them together. And warp drive is used so routinely, by so many different cultures, that anything which threatens to close it off is a disaster- and not just to the Federation.

While I'm not on board with destroying whole civilizations to get at the Omega molecules, the history of the things is full of research and industrial accidents, even by people who think they have the stuff under control. It is not unreasonable for the Federation to regard experiments with the Omega molecule anywhere near its space as a dangerous and provocative act- much like it would be dangerous and provocative to test "dirty" nuclear weapons upwind of another country that could be affected by the fallout.

So up to a point, I cannot criticize a conspiracy to prevent Omega technology from spreading; it really is that dangerous.
'Full of research and industrial accidents' meaning 'on two occasions?' Granted, the fact that the Borg couldn't make it work either is a point in the conspiracy's favor.

But this brings up another issue. The Voyager crew are not in or near Federation space. Janeway brings her crew into this because the Black Ops team Starfleet would normally use is tens of thousands of light-years away. Instead of keeping on her way, maybe altering course slightly to get away from that world quicker, she diverts course to go straight to the Particle. Apparently, destroying the Omega Particle is a greater priority than getting her crew home!
"Any plan which requires the direct intervention of any deity to work can be assumed to be a very poor one."- Newbiespud
User avatar
Enigma
is a laughing fool.
Posts: 7777
Joined: 2003-04-30 10:24pm
Location: c nnyhjdyt yr 45

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Enigma »

As to the VOY episode "Living Witness", if we're to take at face value that 25 isotons could level a city in seconds, then a photorp would be enough if you coose the high end figure of 25 isotons equal to 64.4MT or the low end of 8.05MT (1 isotons = 322KT).

Another reason why I don't think the writers have thought things through is that in VOY "Juggernaut", a Malon export vessel could transport 4 trillion isotons of antimatter waste. If the waste were to detonate, the low end figure of its yield would be 1.288 exa-tons and its high end figure of 10.304 exa-tons.

But of course it is all complete garbage as apparently 54 isotons is enough to blow up a small planet. (VOY: "The Omega Directive")

Too inconsistent.
ASVS('97)/SDN('03)

"Whilst human alchemists refer to the combustion triangle, some of their orcish counterparts see it as more of a hexagon: heat, fuel, air, laughter, screaming, fun." Dawn of the Dragons

ASSCRAVATS!
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Baffalo »

Enigma wrote:As to the VOY episode "Living Witness", if we're to take at face value that 25 isotons could level a city in seconds, then a photorp would be enough if you coose the high end figure of 25 isotons equal to 64.4MT or the low end of 8.05MT (1 isotons = 322KT).

Another reason why I don't think the writers have thought things through is that in VOY "Juggernaut", a Malon export vessel could transport 4 trillion isotons of antimatter waste. If the waste were to detonate, the low end figure of its yield would be 1.288 exa-tons and its high end figure of 10.304 exa-tons.

But of course it is all complete garbage as apparently 54 isotons is enough to blow up a small planet. (VOY: "The Omega Directive")

Too inconsistent.
Honestly, I would just assume that it's the fault of the writers. The writers are basically told to take a technical term and stick it in the show to try and get back in touch with everyone who thought Star Trek was meant to be about science, despite the fact that Star Trek is on par to a philosophy student in scientific insight.

My personal theory is that isoton is a standard unit of reference when it comes to explosives. I say reference in the same way that in mathematics, we have terms for units such as Siemens (1/Ohms), radians, things that we use as a reference but are in fact unit-less. Similar to the way large explosives are refered to as simply 'kilotons' or 'megatons', we know it means pounds of dynamite. It's a standard label but without knowledge of what it refers to, it's meaningless.

So if we treat it like that, let's say we reference explosives to tons of antimatter. In the case of anti-matter, the actual amount of anti-matter is meaningless, because it's not the volume or size, but the mass of anti-matter being used. And if you know how much an equivalent mass of anti-matter releases when it contacts matter, you can use that as a frame of reference. So how much would a ton (or metric ton in this case) produce in terms of power?

One metric ton is 1000 kilograms, or 1,000,000 grams of deuterium. Because the speed of light is 3x108 m/s, a metric ton of anti-matter, when converted to pure energy, releases 3x1017 Joules, or 300 Peta-Joules of energy. Because of the nature of the explosion, we have the equivilent mass in normal matter being destroyed, for a total of 600 Peta-Joules of energy. Just for reference, one ton of TNT releases 4.184x109 Joules of energy. That sounds impressive, but considering we measure nuclear weapons often in megatons, a megaton is 4.184x1015. That means that you're looking at the equivilent of 72 one megaton nuclear weapons in the same package. Forgive me, but considering that both the United States and the Soviet Union had literally thousands of these weapons and bigger, and the worst we predicted was nuclear winter, I don't think anti-matter is really that efficient.

In all honestly? I'd arm my ships with high-yield nuclear weapons if I went toe to toe with a Federation starship, because I'd be reasonably even matched in terms of firepower.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
Simon_Jester
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 30165
Joined: 2009-05-23 07:29pm

Re: Why UFP starship arm such weaken weapons

Post by Simon_Jester »

Ahriman238 wrote:'Full of research and industrial accidents' meaning 'on two occasions?' Granted, the fact that the Borg couldn't make it work either is a point in the conspiracy's favor.
Given the first catastrophic failure with the Federation, and the subsequent Borg failure, and the failure of every other attempt in Star Trek canon that I can find a reference to... maybe Omega molecules really are impossible to control and confine. Maybe there are theoretical problems with the idea of stabilizing them that the Federation has good reason to think are insoluble? Maybe they sought confirmation from more advanced races on this issue?

We don't know all the details. All we know is that the Federation government believes the Omega molecule to be so intrinsically dangerous to interstellar navigation that it is worth taking nearly any reasonable risk (such as the loss of a ship) to be rid of them.

Maybe they're right.

Of course, if there were any evidence in Star Trek for anyone having successfully stabilized an Omega molecule, then the Federation might want to relax its policy. Is there such?
But this brings up another issue. The Voyager crew are not in or near Federation space. Janeway brings her crew into this because the Black Ops team Starfleet would normally use is tens of thousands of light-years away. Instead of keeping on her way, maybe altering course slightly to get away from that world quicker, she diverts course to go straight to the Particle. Apparently, destroying the Omega Particle is a greater priority than getting her crew home!
If Janeway were a proper military officer, she would indeed consider standing orders such as "destroy all Omega molecules at all costs" to take precedence over getting home in a hurry. This would not be surprising.
This space dedicated to Vasily Arkhipov
Post Reply