Grey Goo Weapon

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Baffalo
Jedi Knight
Posts: 805
Joined: 2009-04-18 10:53pm
Location: NWA
Contact:

Grey Goo Weapon

Post by Baffalo »

Image
The Grey Goo scenario is one where a nano-machine targeting specific atoms is improperly or maliciously programmed to attack organic atoms or all atoms, converting all usable material into identical machines which then consume all life on the planet. It's a doomsday scenario and is actually one of those threats that the Pentagon is looking at, even if the technology to build the machines themselves or combat them is still years away. It's a major threat because the nanomachines would, in theory, grow exponentially even from just one, because that one can still produce a second. Those two produce four, those four eight, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384, 32768, 65536, 131072, 262144, 524288, 1048576, etc. And if just one survives, the cycle begins anew.

So we know from TNG: Evolution that even ensigns like Wesley Crusher have access to nanites that, on accident, were released. The intent was not malicious, but could easily have been. A lowly saboteur aboard a starship could easily release nanites that await a pre-set signal that then corrupts a computer core and destroys it, rendering the ship helpless. But that's small time if you apply the Grey Goo scenario to the situation, which could be devestating if released in a critical location such as engineering. With the abundance of metals and polymers and conductors in engineering or other key areas, nanites could easily grow out of control, especially if they reached the warp core.

And that's simply on a starship, which has forcefields and nanites that could potentially combat the invasion. Suppose these nanites were loaded aboard a missile and launched from a remote base from deep inside the heart of a foreign power, maybe with a cloaking device or shielding from sensors. The missile wouldn't be aimed at the heart of the Federation, but rather at the hundreds of remote colonies and outposts with little to no defense against them. The resulting damage would be incalculable, and would set back colony efforts for the good part of a century, not just in terms of the resources devoted to each colony, but also from now needing to defend each colony.

Such a weapon, if it could be disguised to prevent its origin (like a batch stolen from an unsecure Federation lab) would leave the Federation baffled and reeling. Even if a remote colony could defend itself, the damage to the local ecosystem would make the world barren. It's a situation that, quite honestly, would be frightening.
"I subsist on 3 things: Sugar, Caffeine, and Hatred." -Baffalo late at night and hungry

"Why are you worried about the water pressure? You're near the ocean, you've got plenty of water!" -Architect to our team
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Re: Grey Goo Weapon

Post by Alyeska »

Electrical interference will do wonders killing those things. They will be so small that they will be very fragile. EMPs and what not should fry them easily.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Cesario
Subhuman Pedophilia Advocate
Posts: 392
Joined: 2011-10-08 11:34pm

Re: Grey Goo Weapon

Post by Cesario »

Indeed. When Westly's super-nanites started running amok, the episode's guest star just radiation sterilized the area they were infesting. Painful as it may be to contemplate, a similar tactic worked just fine on borg nanoprobes in Enterprise.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Re: Grey Goo Weapon

Post by Uraniun235 »

Baffalo wrote: Suppose these nanites were loaded aboard a missile and launched from a remote base from deep inside the heart of a foreign power, maybe with a cloaking device or shielding from sensors. The missile wouldn't be aimed at the heart of the Federation, but rather at the hundreds of remote colonies and outposts with little to no defense against them. The resulting damage would be incalculable, and would set back colony efforts for the good part of a century, not just in terms of the resources devoted to each colony, but also from now needing to defend each colony.

Such a weapon, if it could be disguised to prevent its origin (like a batch stolen from an unsecure Federation lab) would leave the Federation baffled and reeling. Even if a remote colony could defend itself, the damage to the local ecosystem would make the world barren. It's a situation that, quite honestly, would be frightening.
You don't need to go to the trouble of snatching nanites; DS9 demonstrated that a rabble like the Maquis could effectively make many planets uninhabitable with a couple of hijacked freighters' worth of relatively benign materials.

If anything, it would probably be easier and safer to go the contamination route than with the nanites. You can just put on an environment suit to protect yourself against the chemical contaminants, you can blow all the air out of the ship if you need to, but you might well be fucked if the nanites get out on your ship
"There is no "taboo" on using nuclear weapons." -Julhelm
Image
What is Project Zohar?
"On a serious note (well not really) I did sometimes jump in and rate nBSG episodes a '5' before the episode even aired or I saw it." - RogueIce explaining that episode ratings on SDN tv show threads are bunk
Post Reply