StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Are there any known major power besides the federation that are democracies in star trek?
Has anyone seen elections in the federation?

This should probably be moved to Pure Star Trek.

Solo.13mmfmj wrote:Are there any known major power besides the federation that are democracies in star trek?
Has anyone seen elections in the federation?

Despite the name, the Romulan Star Empire is actually a Roman-style republic, admittedly with police state tendencies.

And there aren't any Federation elections taking place on-screen in the canon, but some do take place in the backstory to STO (Aennik Okeg, a Saurian, won that one).

we see very little of the political processes of any of the AQ powers, we don't IIRC know how Romulan senators are appointed or how federation councilmembers are appointed.

The Cardassian Union supposedly had an elected civilian government for a short while, between the military government being overthrown and the Union being annexed by the Dominion.

The Bajorans also seemed to have an elected government, albeit with some elements of a religious theocracy still remaining.

Moved to PST.

In Star Trek IV the federation Council president appears to be an elderly bearded human, and in Star Trek VI the president is a different guy played by Kurtwood Smith. Although it's never said on-screen, according to the novelization he's a deltan. So while I cannot ever recall having seen an election on-screen, I assume there are term limits and/or elections associated with that office. Of course the president could be elected for life, and the guy in Star Trek IV kicked the bucket shortly thereafter, he did look a bit old, after all.

Even if it's elected, how much does the Federation council matter? Most of the time it seems like Starfleet makes all the big decisions.

If this were the case, why would a Starfleet officer have attempted a coup d'etat against the civilian government in a DS9 episode?

And when you consider that we don't really see anything from a non-Starfleet PoV so that Starfleet Command would seem more important then the council.

That said it was clear that Federation Council was more then willing to metaphorically throw Kirk under the buss to appease the Klingons if that was needed twice in fact, second time over the objections of the Starfleet personal present (Col. West and the Admiral whose name I can't remember atm), this seems to imply that Starfleet is subservient to the Council and not the other way around.

Tribble wrote:Even if it's elected, how much does the Federation council matter? Most of the time it seems like Starfleet makes all the big decisions.

I do have the impression that Starfleet gets a lot of autonomy, but as Simon noted, the evidence points to them still being subordinate to the Federation's civilian government. I suspect that we just don't generally see the politicking because our protagonists are uniformly several rungs down the totem pole from the civilian command structure: roving independent commands in the case of the Enterprises (and probably what Voyager was supposed to be before she got chucked across the galaxy), or a border outpost subordinate to various admirals in Deep Space 9's case.

They still get affected by decisions the Federation Council makes off-screen though. For example, it was their idea to redraw the Federation/Cardassian border in such a haphazard manner as to encourage insurgencies on both sides, and they also issued a condemnation of the Klingon invasion of Cardassia in DS9: "The Way of the Warrior" (which the Klinks responded to by withdrawing from the Khitomer Accords).

Highest we got was James T. Kirk who was an Admiral of a grade I can't remember right now before getting reduced to captain and barely avoiding getting dishonorably discharged.

Lord Revan wrote:Highest we got was James T. Kirk who was an Admiral of a grade I can't remember right now before getting reduced to captain and barely avoiding getting dishonorably discharged.

In TOS T'Pau (who apparently carries some political weight) intervened to basically get Kirk off the hook for defying orders, and diverting the Enterprise to Vulcan. Since she was a civilian religious or political figure I'd assume she went to somebody she knew in the Federation, who then approached Starfleet.

To lend some weight to the "several rungs" comment, at the beginning of the film it seemed the Federation President was content to just let Starfleet discipline Kirk, responding to the Klingon's demand he be extradited that he has been charged with "violations of Starfleet regulations." The President only intervened because Kirk and company saved the planet en-route home.

That said, I feel like that may have rankled Starfleet somewhat, and I think you could play around with the fact that Kirk retires less than ten years later, and the Ent-A is decommissioned. I could see Starfleet taking a position that they had to treat him like a hero, but ultimately it would be time to quietly retire him when public memory faded.

I assume only reason neither Starfleet nor the council wanted Kirk given to the Klingons was to not allow the Klingon Empire get away with the actions of Captain Krudge who violated federation space (IIRC), caused the destruction of 2 Starfleet vessels (The Grissom and the Enterprise) and the Death of all but 1 of the crew of the Grissom and did all without clear provocation, oh and possibly violated the Genesis quarantine if Klingons recognized that. Sure Krudge was a renegade but so was Kirk and the KDF is just as responsible for making sure it's renegade members are brought to justice as Starfleet is.

As for TUC it wouldn't surprise me if the Klingon High Council declared Kirk free of the charges he was previously convicted as the conspiracy was revealed publically so that The Klingon Empire couldn't just sweep it under the rug.

As I recall, by the 24th Century, Kirk was a legend among the Klingons. Worf admired him, and Koloth (I think) regretted never being able to face him in combat.

Now part of me wants to say that at some point, Kirk actually got a statue in the Hall of Warriors...but for the life of me I can't find any canon reference to that. It might have been a fanfic.

Here's another theory, extrapolating from the autonomy we see Starfleet get in the show. The Federation Council declares war but then stays hands-off and lets Starfleet decide how to prosecute it.

Borgholio wrote:As I recall, by the 24th Century, Kirk was a legend among the Klingons. Worf admired him, and Koloth (I think) regretted never being able to face him in combat.

Now part of me wants to say that at some point, Kirk actually got a statue in the Hall of Warriors...but for the life of me I can't find any canon reference to that. It might have been a fanfic.

Yep, that was Koloth (it comes up in DS9: "Blood Oath", though there's a possible contradiction there with TAS: "More Tribbles, More Troubles"), and that was probably a fanfic since I can't find any EU reference on Memory Beta either. But it would make sense if he did have a statue.

We never seen any elections of any kind, or even hear any discussions, but the people we do see in the Federation certainly act as if they have some kind of representative government.

My personal assumption has always been that every planet in the Federation has its own local government, which may or may not be elected. That government appoints someone to be its representative on the Federation Council. The Council elects one of its own members to be President (much as a parliament elects one of its members to be Prime Minister).

This means that your representation as a Federation citizen varies a lot depending on what planet you're from.

You may have to have a reasonably representative democratic government to even join The Federation. We known from DS9 there are requirements for entry. You're not allowed to have any caste based systems in place for example.

Solo.13mmfmj wrote:Are there any known major power besides the federation that are democracies in star trek?
Has anyone seen elections in the federation?

Romulans - I guess. They have a senate, senators, governors... it's modeled on ancient rome v0v

Cardassian Detappa Council

Klingons, depending on how you look at it.

Do the Borg count?


Jarish Enyo (sp?) says something about elections in Home Front (DS9).
Kirk told Kor it was a democracy.
So:

Federation
Romulans
Cardassians
Borg (well, everyone has a "voice" :p)

The Klingons tried democracy. It was known as "the dark times".

Other races:

Angel 1
Tau Cygna V
Bajor

Crazedwraith wrote:You may have to have a reasonably representative democratic government to even join The Federation. We known from DS9 there are requirements for entry. You're not allowed to have any caste based systems in place for example.

What was actually said was that caste-based discrimination (e.g. the hate crime we see later in the episode) is not allowed. It's quite possible to have a caste system without discrimination (ref: the Polaris in EV Nova, the Protoss in StarCraft).

Also, you can get kicked out if your planetary government collapses (Yar's homeworld Turkana IV).

StarSword wrote: Also, you can get kicked out if your planetary government collapses (Yar's homeworld Turkana IV).

Tasha wasn't kicked out, she escaped.

Prometheus Unbound wrote:

StarSword wrote: Also, you can get kicked out if your planetary government collapses (Yar's homeworld Turkana IV).

Tasha wasn't kicked out, she escaped.

he was referring to the Planet she was from not Yar herself.

Lord Revan wrote:

Prometheus Unbound wrote:

StarSword wrote: Also, you can get kicked out if your planetary government collapses (Yar's homeworld Turkana IV).

Tasha wasn't kicked out, she escaped.

he was referring to the Planet she was from not Yar herself.

my bad

Crazedwraith wrote:You may have to have a reasonably representative democratic government to even join The Federation. We known from DS9 there are requirements for entry. You're not allowed to have any caste based systems in place for example.

Oh, I don't doubt that. The Federation does have some (vague) standards that a planet must meet to be accepted as a member. I think a global government of some sort is one of them (although I think I remember one episode in which they were considering an exception to that rule). Presumably that government can't be a military dictatorship, but just what sort of "representative" government they would accept isn't all that clear, either.

Then again, in our own history we've seen several supposedly "representative" governments that were in fact dictatorships. Any single-party state for instance is notionally a representative democracy, just with only one choice on the ballot (or some other means of ensuring the "right" choice).

Eternal_Freedom wrote:Then again, in our own history we've seen several supposedly "representative" governments that were in fact dictatorships. Any single-party state for instance is notionally a representative democracy, just with only one choice on the ballot (or some other means of ensuring the "right" choice).

Any nation that prefaces it's actual name with "People's Republic of..."