Star Trek: Insufficient
Posted: 2016-09-24 06:30am
Basically a faux-script parodying Star Trek Insurrection. I read this years ago and got quite a few laughs out of it.
Link.
Link.
Get your fill of sci-fi, science, and mockery of stupid ideas
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/
http://stardestroyer.dyndns-home.com/viewtopic.php?f=18&t=165512
I gave up after a little while. It's amazing how a decade and a half make pop culture references stop being funny and just sort of 'meh'.SolarpunkFan wrote:Basically a faux-script parodying Star Trek Insurrection. I read this years ago and got quite a few laughs out of it.
Link.
Reminds me of "The Beast" Rabban Harkonnen from Dune (1983). That's not funny, that's just gross.Sojef clubs a cow in the head, which falls unconscious. Sojef proceeds to tear the cow's throat out and eats it hungrily.
and it doesn't make any sense storywise either, for all it's faults Insurrection I never got the feeling that Ba'ku were suppose to be "the true evil" more like naive and misguided but not evil and this just seem the writer of this thing indulging on his brutality to animals fetish.Darth Lucifer wrote:Reminds me of "The Beast" Rabban Harkonnen from Dune (1983). That's not funny, that's just gross.Sojef clubs a cow in the head, which falls unconscious. Sojef proceeds to tear the cow's throat out and eats it hungrily.
well if that's the case by making it so unsudtle they actually ruined the intended meaning, it doesn't come of as showning hyprocrity so much as it comes of as random violence with no ryme or reason.Crazedwraith wrote:I think the point was 'oh look at us saying we're so peaceful and enlightened' and yet if they still eat meat, they still be being cruel and violent to animals. Obviously exaggerated for effect not representative of actual animal slaughter.