Transporters

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Rye
To Mega Therion
Posts: 12493
Joined: 2003-03-08 07:48am
Location: Uighur, please!

Transporters

Post by Rye »

Is there any reason for them to be different colours and stuff for the different races?
EBC|Fucking Metal|Artist|Androgynous Sexfiend|Gozer Kvltist|
Listen to my music! http://www.soundclick.com/nihilanth
"America is, now, the most powerful and economically prosperous nation in the country." - Master of Ossus
User avatar
Jason von Evil
Sol Badguy
Posts: 8103
Joined: 2002-11-29 02:13am
Location: Writer of the fictions
Contact:

Post by Jason von Evil »

Nope, just visual effects.
"It was the hooker rationing that finally drove people over the edge." - Mike on coup in Thailand.
Image
User avatar
Sir Sirius
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination

Post by Sir Sirius »

Realworld reason: None really, just visual appeal in different colours.

Trekverse reason: Probably just a bit different technogies used to create the same effect (transportation). Remember that Feddie transport effect has changed as well.
Image
User avatar
Superman
Pink Foamin' at the Mouth
Posts: 9690
Joined: 2002-12-16 12:29am
Location: Metropolis

Post by Superman »

But there is something about them that pisses me off. During Kirk and Spock's time, it took maybe 10 seconds to fully materiaze. Then, during TNG it was a little faster, which makes sense because the technology has improved. Then in Voyager, beaming up took about two seconds... I guess that makes sense...

In Enterprise, their transporters take about the same amount of time to materialize that they took in Voyager? WTF?
Image
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Superman wrote:But there is something about them that pisses me off. During Kirk and Spock's time, it took maybe 10 seconds to fully materiaze. Then, during TNG it was a little faster, which makes sense because the technology has improved. Then in Voyager, beaming up took about two seconds... I guess that makes sense...

In Enterprise, their transporters take about the same amount of time to materialize that they took in Voyager? WTF?
Hadn't noticed that. In ENT they should take upwards of 30 seconds to work seeing as it is brand new technology.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Superman
Pink Foamin' at the Mouth
Posts: 9690
Joined: 2002-12-16 12:29am
Location: Metropolis

Post by Superman »

Right. That's what I am saying. :wink:
Image
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Now, they could fix this little problem by having a massive transport accident in which people are melded together (not like the Voyager episode) and the pile of flesh that was people dies. They then realize they were transporting way to fast and that they were all VERY lucky to have survived as long as they did. From that point forward the process takes 15-20 seconds to beam people up.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
Howedar
Emperor's Thumb
Posts: 12472
Joined: 2002-07-03 05:06pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Howedar »

I predict it would be the black guy.
Howedar is no longer here. Need to talk to him? Talk to Pick.
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

It'd be a real challenge to direct correctly; nobody really wants to sit and watch people beam in for half-a-minute.
User avatar
Sir Sirius
Sith Devotee
Posts: 2975
Joined: 2002-12-09 12:15pm
Location: 6 hr 45 min R.A. and -16 degrees 43 minutes declination

Post by Sir Sirius »

Uraniun235 wrote:It'd be a real challenge to direct correctly; nobody really wants to sit and watch people beam in for half-a-minute.
I was thinking the same thing. Better out-of-era-swit transporters then, Zzzzzzzz-Groooh-h-slow transporters.
Image
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Then they could use time dialation events. Even better, they could use shuttles like normal and just show launch then landing. There are things they could do to make it seem long while not wasting the time.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
TrailerParkJawa
Sith Acolyte
Posts: 5850
Joined: 2002-07-04 11:49pm
Location: San Jose, California

Post by TrailerParkJawa »

Alyeska wrote:Now, they could fix this little problem by having a massive transport accident in which people are melded together (not like the Voyager episode) and the pile of flesh that was people dies. They then realize they were transporting way to fast and that they were all VERY lucky to have survived as long as they did. From that point forward the process takes 15-20 seconds to beam people up.
They need to have the same error as in Galaxy Quest. "....and it exploded!"
MEMBER of the Anti-PETA Anti-Facist LEAGUE
Post Reply