Why oh Stek Trek? Why?

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Why oh Stek Trek? Why?

Post by Wicked Pilot »

I was just checking out the new release dates over at Digital Bits, and apparently Star Trek V CE DVD will be coming out this year, while the much superior Star Trek VI CE will not come out until 2004. WHAT IS FUCKING WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE! How the hell do they release V before VI? V is shit, pure, simple and stinky. VI is my favorite of the films, and I'd imagine very few here would rank it less than third of the ten. Yet I have to wait till 2004 to get the collector's edition while I, III, and V get the go ahead. This sucks where no man has sucked before!
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Re: Why oh Stek Trek? Why?

Post by YT300000 »

Wicked Pilot wrote:I was just checking out the new release dates over at Digital Bits, and apparently Star Trek V CE DVD will be coming out this year, while the much superior Star Trek VI CE will not come out until 2004. WHAT IS FUCKING WRONG WITH THESE PEOPLE! How the hell do they release V before VI? V is shit, pure, simple and stinky. VI is my favorite of the films, and I'd imagine very few here would rank it less than third of the ten. Yet I have to wait till 2004 to get the collector's edition while I, III, and V get the go ahead. This sucks where no man has sucked before!
They will do all the bad ones first (the odd numbered ones). Then they will never release the good ones (the even ones). Why?

Because its B&B.
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Hmmm they released 1,2,3,4 and now 5 hmm I know there is a pattern here but I just can't see it :roll: .

Paramount are releasing the DVD's in order they were made so why complain about it? and there is nothing wrong with them this release pattern actually makes sense.
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

TheDarkling wrote:Hmmm they released 1,2,3,4 and now 5 hmm I know there is a pattern here but I just can't see it :roll:
Release Dates
The Motion Picture DE - May 13, 2003
The Wrath of Khan DE - August 6, 2002
The Search for Spock SE - May 13, 2003
The Voyage Home SE - March 4, 2003


You were saying?
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Star Trek 1: The Motion Picture - The Director's Edition [1979]
Paramount Home Entertainment (UK)
DVD - 6 May, 2002

Star Trek 2: The Wrath of Khan - Directors Edition (Two Disc Set) [1982]
Paramount Home Entertainment (UK)
DVD - 18 November, 2002

Star Trek 3: The Search for Spock -- Two Disc Special Edition [1984]
Paramount Home Entertainment (UK)
DVD - 13 January, 2003

Star Trek 4: The Voyage Home (Special Edition)
Paramount Home Entertainment (UK)
DVD - 2 June, 2003

I was going off the UK dates which as you see are in order although I don't trust your release dates since the Motion Picture Directors edition is listed as coming out earlier.

http://video.barnesandnoble.com/search/ ... 7360885842
http://www.bureau42.com/view/1301
http://www.geocities.com/ussmunchkin/Trek_DVD_1.htm
http://www.dvdmoviecentral.com/ReviewsT ... icture.htm
http://www.trektoday.com/news/291101_01.shtml

At the above places and far more if you do a search, your search for Spock date is also off according to the above places and here
http://www.startrek.com/news/productnews.asp?ID=125914

Anyway as I say I was under the impression that the US releases were in the same order as the UK ones and apologise if they weren't (although I am rather sure that the Motion picture came out when the above links say it did and not when your release dates say).
User avatar
Drooling Iguana
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4975
Joined: 2003-05-13 01:07am
Location: Sector ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha

Post by Drooling Iguana »

Wicked Pilot wrote:
TheDarkling wrote:Hmmm they released 1,2,3,4 and now 5 hmm I know there is a pattern here but I just can't see it :roll:
Release Dates
The Motion Picture DE - May 13, 2003
The Wrath of Khan DE - August 6, 2002
The Search for Spock SE - May 13, 2003
The Voyage Home SE - March 4, 2003


You were saying?
Where the hell did you get those release dates from? I rented the TMP Director's edition back when I was still living with my old roommate. I moved out of that place in January of 2002.
Image
"Stop! No one can survive these deadly rays!"
"These deadly rays will be your death!"
- Thor and Akton, Starcrash

"Before man reaches the moon your mail will be delivered within hours from New York to California, to England, to India or to Australia by guided missiles.... We stand on the threshold of rocket mail."
- Arthur Summerfield, US Postmaster General 1953 - 1961
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

Wicked Pilot wrote:
TheDarkling wrote:Hmmm they released 1,2,3,4 and now 5 hmm I know there is a pattern here but I just can't see it :roll:
Release Dates
The Motion Picture DE - May 13, 2003
The Wrath of Khan DE - August 6, 2002
The Search for Spock SE - May 13, 2003
The Voyage Home SE - March 4, 2003

You were saying?
Those release dates are certainly not true. I got TMP DE (R1) for Christmas 2001, and it was purchased right after Thanksgiving about a month before.

According to DVDFILE.com, the Region 1 release dates for the ST film sets have been as follows:
ST1 (TMP) DE: November 6, 2001
ST2 (TWOK) DE: August 6, 2002
ST3 (TSFS) CE: October 22, 2002 (from Digital Bits)
ST4 (TVH) CE: March 4, 2003

I can accept the TMP date just being a typo, as it's the same as the STIV date, but it's clear that STIII was released on R1 months before STIV, and the films have been released in numerical order.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
Wicked Pilot
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 8972
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm

Post by Wicked Pilot »

I was going off Amazon.com's info. I was quite certain that I remember the DVDs not coming out in order. Oh well, if you guys are right, then you guys are right. It still pisses me off though that I have to wait for 2004 to get VI.
The most basic assumption about the world is that it does not contradict itself.
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Wicked Pilot wrote:...I'd imagine very few here would rank it less than third of the ten.
Hi there. It stunk.
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
Darth Garden Gnome
Official SD.Net Lawn Ornament
Posts: 6029
Joined: 2002-07-08 02:35am
Location: Some where near a mailbox

Post by Darth Garden Gnome »

Frank Hipper wrote:Hi there. It stunk.
You must be kidding. Star Trek 6? The Final Frontier? Are we on the same page here? Next to ST: II, ST: VI is the greatest Star Trek film of all time.
Leader of the Secret Gnome Revolution
User avatar
Frank Hipper
Overfiend of the Superego
Posts: 12882
Joined: 2002-10-17 08:48am
Location: Hamilton, Ohio?

Post by Frank Hipper »

Darth Garden Gnome wrote:
Frank Hipper wrote:Hi there. It stunk.
You must be kidding. Star Trek 6? The Final Frontier? Are we on the same page here? Next to ST: II, ST: VI is the greatest Star Trek film of all time.
I've been through this before with people. I hated it. It shocks people, I know, but I enjoy TMP much more.
Best thing in ST VI were the K'T'inga closeups.
For me, that is. :?
Image
Life is all the eternity you get, use it wisely.
User avatar
neoolong
Dead Sexy 'Shroom
Posts: 13180
Joined: 2002-08-29 10:01pm
Location: California

Post by neoolong »

Wicked Pilot wrote:I was going off Amazon.com's info. I was quite certain that I remember the DVDs not coming out in order. Oh well, if you guys are right, then you guys are right. It still pisses me off though that I have to wait for 2004 to get VI.
I forget, does Amazon list new dates when they do price drops? Because some sites do.
Member of the BotM. @( !.! )@
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

Frankly, I like Star Trek 5 better than ANY of the TNG films. It's simply more fun as a movie to watch.

I wonder if Star Trek 6 will be a full Director's Edition as TWOK was, or just a "Special Edition".
User avatar
Spanky The Dolphin
Mammy Two-Shoes
Posts: 30776
Joined: 2002-07-05 05:45pm
Location: Reykjavík, Iceland (not really)

Post by Spanky The Dolphin »

neoolong wrote:
Wicked Pilot wrote:I was going off Amazon.com's info. I was quite certain that I remember the DVDs not coming out in order. Oh well, if you guys are right, then you guys are right. It still pisses me off though that I have to wait for 2004 to get VI.
I forget, does Amazon list new dates when they do price drops? Because some sites do.
I don't think so. Amazon sometimes messes up or they get stuff quite some time after the release dates. I remember having to wait like a month or two to get my copies of the Akira volumes that I didn't buy at the local bookstore.

But I think in this case, it's just a typo.
Image
I believe in a sign of Zeta.

[BOTM|WG|JL|Mecha Maniacs|Pax Cybertronia|Veteran of the Psychic Wars|Eva Expert]

"And besides, who cares if a monster destroys Australia?"
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Why is ST:6 revered as the second-best movie? It drags for so long and ends in an anticlimactic battle. Was I missing something? :?
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Uraniun235
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13772
Joined: 2002-09-12 12:47am
Location: OREGON
Contact:

Post by Uraniun235 »

Drama, political intrigue and suspense make the movie good.
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Uraniun235 wrote:Drama, political intrigue and suspense make the movie good.
At the beginning, I'd say yes. After a while, this slowly disappeared, IMO.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Equinox2003
Jedi Knight
Posts: 832
Joined: 2003-03-16 08:08pm

Post by Equinox2003 »

I don't quite know when the suspense vanished in ST6. There was plenty
of it as I recall. Guessing who Spock would name in the mind meld,
the race to the peace talks, I thought there was suspense all the way
through.
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Equinox2003 wrote:I don't quite know when the suspense vanished in ST6. There was plenty
of it as I recall. Guessing who Spock would name in the mind meld,
the race to the peace talks, I thought there was suspense all the way
through.
Who was Spock naming again, I forget. The "race" to the peace talks wasn't that eventful, by then you should have just assumed they'd come and save the day.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Tsyroc
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 13748
Joined: 2002-07-29 08:35am
Location: Tucson, Arizona

Post by Tsyroc »

I sill wish they would have used Saviik as the betrayer. Not that Kim Catrall didn't look hot as Valleris but it would have had more emotional impact having a long term character betray Spock like that.

Of course that would have had even more emotional impact if she'd been the mother of his child from his Pon Far on the Genesis planet. :?

So many missed opportunities. :(
By the pricking of my thumb,
Something wicked this way comes.
Open, locks,
Whoever knocks.
User avatar
Equinox2003
Jedi Knight
Posts: 832
Joined: 2003-03-16 08:08pm

Post by Equinox2003 »

After a mind meld, Spock named the conspirators who were planning
to wreck the peace talks. The race to the conference was not the only
point of suspense either. There was also the ship wide man hunt, and
also Kirk and McCoy's break from the prison into the snow. They got
caught and Kirk was nearly shot. There was plenty of suspense.
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Uraniun235 wrote:Frankly, I like Star Trek 5 better than ANY of the TNG films. It's simply more fun as a movie to watch.

I wonder if Star Trek 6 will be a full Director's Edition as TWOK was, or just a "Special Edition".
:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock:

What are you on?

Image
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
User avatar
StarshipTitanic
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4475
Joined: 2002-07-03 09:41pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by StarshipTitanic »

Equinox2003 wrote:After a mind meld, Spock named the conspirators who were planning
to wreck the peace talks. The race to the conference was not the only
point of suspense either. There was also the ship wide man hunt, and
also Kirk and McCoy's break from the prison into the snow. They got
caught and Kirk was nearly shot. There was plenty of suspense.
I think knowing that all Star Trek ends well ruined any suspence for me.
"Man's unfailing capacity to believe what he prefers to be true rather than what the evidence shows to be likely and possible has always astounded me...God has not been proven not to exist, therefore he must exist." -- Academician Prokhor Zakharov

"Hal grabs life by the balls and doesn't let you do that [to] hal."

"I hereby declare myself master of the known world."
User avatar
Death from the Sea
Sith Devotee
Posts: 3376
Joined: 2002-10-30 05:32pm
Location: TEXAS
Contact:

Post by Death from the Sea »

Cool smiley YT
"War.... it's faaaaaantastic!" <--- Hot Shots:Part Duex
"Psychos don't explode when sunlight hits them, I don't care how fucking crazy they are!"~ Seth from Dusk Till Dawn
|BotM|Justice League's Lethal Protector
User avatar
YT300000
Sith'ari
Posts: 6528
Joined: 2003-05-20 12:49pm
Location: Calgary, Canada
Contact:

Post by YT300000 »

Death from the Sea wrote:Cool smiley YT
Thanks.

Image
Name changes are for people who wear women's clothes. - Zuul

Wow. It took me a good minute to remember I didn't have testicles. -xBlackFlash

Are you sure this isn't like that time Michael Jackson stopped by your house so he could use the bathroom? - Superman
Post Reply