Military/civilian status of Starfleet

PST: discuss Star Trek without "versus" arguments.

Moderator: Vympel

Post Reply
User avatar
Supreme_Warlord
Youngling
Posts: 149
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:04pm
Location: East Ham, London, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Universe

Military/civilian status of Starfleet

Post by Supreme_Warlord »

Hi,
Just wasnted to post a quote regarding the thread title
The Romulan Strategem (TNG Book #35 - Page 80) wrote:To parapharase (I don't have the book at hand and don't remember the dialogue exactly):

Dr. Crusher: My son has just joined Starfleet Academy.
Plactus (Romulan Sub-Commander): Ah it seems we will each have a son in the military!
Dr. Crusher: Starfleet is not the military Sub-Commander and you know that. :roll:
Plactus: Ah but doctor, if there are hostilities, it is Starfleet that will defend the borders. That is military and you know that.
Is there a reason why stupid people out there still feel the need to dispute Starfleet's status :?:
For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, no explanation will suffice.

Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________

100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

The Federation got all touchy feely about things. It seems everyone but Starfleet itself knows that Starfleet is military. Its structure, one of its primary missions, and its ships clearly indicate a military status. At least certain people within Starfleet recognize how things work. O'Brien has been called a soldier on countless occasions, Maxwell had a well run ship, and Jellico was most definately a captain. Now it seems the Federation began to realize its mistake because Starfleet took a much more military stance since the start of the Dominion war.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Supreme_Warlord
Youngling
Posts: 149
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:04pm
Location: East Ham, London, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Universe

Post by Supreme_Warlord »

Alyeska wrote:The Federation got all touchy feely about things. It seems everyone but Starfleet itself knows that Starfleet is military. Its structure, one of its primary missions, and its ships clearly indicate a military status. At least certain people within Starfleet recognize how things work. O'Brien has been called a soldier on countless occasions, Maxwell had a well run ship, and Jellico was most definately a captain. Now it seems the Federation began to realize its mistake because Starfleet took a much more military stance since the start of the Dominion war.
I agree with everything you said, but I was referring to the real world Trekkies (I think there were a few a few months back) who still try and claim Starfleet is a non-military organization even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, no explanation will suffice.

Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________

100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Supreme_Warlord wrote:
Alyeska wrote:The Federation got all touchy feely about things. It seems everyone but Starfleet itself knows that Starfleet is military. Its structure, one of its primary missions, and its ships clearly indicate a military status. At least certain people within Starfleet recognize how things work. O'Brien has been called a soldier on countless occasions, Maxwell had a well run ship, and Jellico was most definately a captain. Now it seems the Federation began to realize its mistake because Starfleet took a much more military stance since the start of the Dominion war.
I agree with everything you said, but I was referring to the real world Trekkies (I think there were a few a few months back) who still try and claim Starfleet is a non-military organization even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Ah yes, I debated several in regards to who was a better captain (Jellico or Picard) and the fucking idiots continue their rant. The simple fact of the matter is the structure, mission, and ships used by Starfleet clearly are military in nature and one is delusional to not believe this. These are the same people that think that TOS and early TNG are "Real Trek" and hate DS9 because of the dark nature and the war. It seems these people have their heads in the sand and can't see reality.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Supreme_Warlord
Youngling
Posts: 149
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:04pm
Location: East Ham, London, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Universe

Post by Supreme_Warlord »

Alyeska wrote:... These are the same people that think that TOS and early TNG are "Real Trek" and hate DS9 because of the dark nature and the war ...
If the definition of "Real Trek" were to mean the standard of stories and non-use of deluge levels of technobabble, then I would agree with them.

Having said that, if one does judge a series by the standards of its stories and the realistic portrayal of human behaviour and interaction with alien species, then DS9 is up there with the best of them, with ENT, late TNG and VOY being aberattions.
For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, no explanation will suffice.

Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________

100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Supreme_Warlord wrote:
Alyeska wrote:... These are the same people that think that TOS and early TNG are "Real Trek" and hate DS9 because of the dark nature and the war ...
If the definition of "Real Trek" were to mean the standard of stories and non-use of deluge levels of technobabble, then I would agree with them.

Having said that, if one does judge a series by the standards of its stories and the realistic portrayal of human behaviour and interaction with alien species, then DS9 is up there with the best of them, with ENT, late TNG and VOY being aberattions.
These people also forget that early TNG and all of TOS as well as the movies clearly show war, chaos, and a MILITARY! :x
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

Alyeska wrote: Ah yes, I debated several in regards to who was a better captain (Jellico or Picard) and the fucking idiots continue their rant. The simple fact of the matter is the structure, mission, and ships used by Starfleet clearly are military in nature and one is delusional to not believe this. These are the same people that think that TOS and early TNG are "Real Trek" and hate DS9 because of the dark nature and the war. It seems these people have their heads in the sand and can't see reality.
I would love to see some of those debates.
These people also forget that early TNG and all of TOS as well as the movies clearly show war, chaos, and a MILITARY!
Meh, I don't know about early TNG- TOS was military without a doubt but early TNG- under the control of Rodenberry unleashed with all his pinko-commie (sorry Gene) ideals and inane declarations (there must be NO conflict in between the members of the crew! I.e. throwing out the popular McCoy vs Spock thing from TOS) didn't strike me as very martial. Even the Ferengi episode was pretty sucky in that regard.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Supreme_Warlord
Youngling
Posts: 149
Joined: 2002-07-04 12:04pm
Location: East Ham, London, United Kingdom, Europe, Earth, Sol System, Orion Arm, Milky Way, Universe

Post by Supreme_Warlord »

If Palpatine keeps managing to come back from the dead, why could Kirk not be similarly resussicated. He could have kept cloning himself in the transporter everytime he wanted to.

BTW, the above is not meant to be a serious idea but it does express my nostalgia for the whole TOS representation of Trek. If I had to pick an all time favourite slice of Trek, it would have to be The Undiscovered Country.
For those who believe, no explanation is necessary. For those who do not, no explanation will suffice.

Men don't follow titles, they follow courage!
________________________________________

100th post on Wed, 28 Apr, 2004 15:23
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Vympel wrote:I would love to see some of those debates.
Ask and you shall recieve

And another one
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Post by Vympel »

I'm into like page 4. This is fun. As I recall, since I've never seen the episode, Jellico is the actor who plays evil executive 'Dick' in Robocop and Cohagen in Total Recall.

What're those two episodes called again? I might get them ... from somewhere.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Vympel wrote:I'm into like page 4. This is fun. As I recall, since I've never seen the episode, Jellico is the actor who plays evil executive 'Dick' in Robocop and Cohagen in Total Recall.

What're those two episodes called again? I might get them ... from somewhere.
Chains of Command PT 1&2
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
Alyeska
Federation Ambassador
Posts: 17496
Joined: 2002-08-11 07:28pm
Location: Montana, USA

Post by Alyeska »

Rereading this thread again (which I had taken part in AND created) I am getting very pissed off with Ladiesman. This idiot continues to spout his bullshit even today how DS9 sucked and wasn't True Trek and all that crap.
"If the facts are on your side, pound on the facts. If the law is on your side, pound on the law. If neither is on your side, pound on the table."

"The captain claimed our people violated a 4,000 year old treaty forbidding us to develop hyperspace technology. Extermination of our planet was the consequence. The subject did not survive interrogation."
User avatar
TheDarkling
Sith Marauder
Posts: 4768
Joined: 2002-07-04 10:34am

Post by TheDarkling »

Alyeska wrote:Rereading this thread again (which I had taken part in AND created) I am getting very pissed off with Ladiesman. This idiot continues to spout his bullshit even today how DS9 sucked and wasn't True Trek and all that crap.
Yeah I was having that argument with him again less that 4 days ago.
User avatar
Posbi
Padawan Learner
Posts: 248
Joined: 2003-01-21 12:58pm

Post by Posbi »

Alyeska wrote:Rereading this thread again (which I had taken part in AND created) I am getting very pissed off with Ladiesman. This idiot continues to spout his bullshit even today how DS9 sucked and wasn't True Trek and all that crap.
He's been doing so ever since he registered, Aly. Has been fun at the start, but by now it's just ennerving.
Making your swords into ploughshares will only make you plough for those who didn't.

If you can't solve a problem by using violence: You're probably not using enough of it!
User avatar
Gil Hamilton
Tipsy Space Birdie
Posts: 12962
Joined: 2002-07-04 05:47pm
Contact:

Post by Gil Hamilton »

Actually, Ladiesman is my favorite Trekkie ever. I *heart* Trekkies that think that StarTrek is infallible. They are so fun to play with. :D
"Show me an angel and I will paint you one." - Gustav Courbet

"Quetzalcoatl, plumed serpent of the Aztecs... you are a pussy." - Stephen Colbert

"Really, I'm jealous of how much smarter than me he is. I'm not an expert on anything and he's an expert on things he knows nothing about." - Me, concerning a bullshitter
Post Reply