starwars is gay startrek is cool

Failed Glory · Post by **Failed Glory** » 2002-10-22 01:27pm

Relax. Someone could have typed www.sta and saw this site come up under Exploder. They could've been headed to www.stackedpancakes.com. or starvingpornstars.com.

In any case, I would love to see the next idiot just left alone to blabber on a thread alone about how text equals pictures, one Kirk phaser could destroy an ISD, and how his/her debate skills far surpass anyone since Plato, no no including Plato and Aristotle.

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2002-10-22 01:41pm

Stormbringer wrote:
Kamakazie Sith wrote:
Darth Akwat Kbrana wrote:LOL! I never cease to be amazed at the supidity of Trek morons. Was that supposed to persuade us to like Trek better? Was it a challenge to a debate? I pathetic cry for a flame war? Or maybe you just want people to think you're an insubordinant moron, it seems to be working.
Trek morons huh? You do realize that the person who started this thread is pro-SW. You may now eat your foot.
Actually Bean deleted the first post while sleep deprivived. But then again it seems like anti-trek has developed a troll personae.

I saw Starfleets first post, but like Bean said.....the both seem to have the same IP.

Post by **NecronLord** » 2002-10-22 02:41pm

To the Hangin Tree!!

jegs2 · Post by **jegs2** » 2002-10-22 02:54pm

antitrek wrote:hmm my sig seems to be quite apporiete for this

ps die die die die die die die die and DIE

Lay off the drugs, son.

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2002-10-22 03:01pm

Seeing as antitrek was the FIRST person to post in response, its pretty clear he was the one to post the thread in the first place. He used a new account, posted the thread, then switched to his old account and responded to it.

Unless antitrek is claiming that someone decided to take the exact opposite stance from his own by posting on the computer he was just using while he (antitrek) went to the crapper and by some complete random chance after having gone to the crapper, antitrek decides to come back to the computer and imediately post a response to the thread he didn't create...

jegs2 · Post by **jegs2** » 2002-10-22 03:21pm

Alyeska wrote:Seeing as antitrek was the FIRST person to post in response, its pretty clear he was the one to post the thread in the first place. He used a new account, posted the thread, then switched to his old account and responded to it.

Unless antitrek is claiming that someone decided to take the exact opposite stance from his own by posting on the computer he was just using while he (antitrek) went to the crapper and by some complete random chance after having gone to the crapper, antitrek decides to come back to the computer and imediately post a response to the thread he didn't create...

Hmmmmmm, he must really be bored then...

Failed Glory · Post by **Failed Glory** » 2002-10-22 04:15pm

antitrek may have doneit , but what does that matter? So he tried to trick some folks into going nuts on some fake rabid ST fan? If so the joke ended up on him as he has begged for his SD.net life and against banishment.

If you have to punish someone for alias creation and subsequent subterfuge, maybe their rank can change to "Wiener Double Agent" for a month. Suitable punishment for a victimless crime.

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2002-10-22 05:03pm

Failed Glory wrote:antitrek may have doneit , but what does that matter? So he tried to trick some folks into going nuts on some fake rabid ST fan? If so the joke ended up on him as he has begged for his SD.net life and against banishment.

If you have to punish someone for alias creation and subsequent subterfuge, maybe their rank can change to "Wiener Double Agent" for a month. Suitable punishment for a victimless crime.

Though if, by chance, the poster was female it just wouldn't have as much impact.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2002-10-22 05:22pm

His account has been deactivated and if it was Anti-Trek you are now officly warned

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2002-10-22 05:25pm

What about that GRAND ADMIRAL HAMILTON kid? Isn't he one of antitrek's cronies?

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2002-10-22 07:14pm

antitrek wrote:hey its not me okay it is probably one of a few trekkies or computer nerds at my school who are always making people lifes a misery .please dont ban me because some git nicked my account number on a local server who has been expelled twice because of it .

please dont ban me

My brother/sister/dog/classmate/nerd/hamster/stuffed teddy bear stole my account and is posting bad things it's not my fault please don't ban me. Ahhh Shut Up!! Like we haven't heard that one before you stupid fucknut, that shit is right out of the standard troll manual. Damn, these trolls are really coming out of the woodwork lately, too bad they're so worthless it's barely any fun to flame them.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-10-22 07:27pm

Is there any reason to have this thread around? It seems to make no points, and nothing is happening as a result of it on either side. Can a mod just close it and end it, or move it to the HoS?

Vertigo1 · Post by **Vertigo1** » 2002-10-22 07:41pm

Alyeska wrote:Seeing as antitrek was the FIRST person to post in response, its pretty clear he was the one to post the thread in the first place. He used a new account, posted the thread, then switched to his old account and responded to it.

Unless antitrek is claiming that someone decided to take the exact opposite stance from his own by posting on the computer he was just using while he (antitrek) went to the crapper and by some complete random chance after having gone to the crapper, antitrek decides to come back to the computer and imediately post a response to the thread he didn't create...

Need I remind you that I once made the mistake of staying logged in on campus and someone altered my account and made some rather offensive posts a few years ago on SB? (when I was modding the now defunct newbie forum) His story might be true. I say lets give him the benefit of the doubt until proven otherwise.

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2002-10-22 08:07pm

Lemme see if I have this all clear:

It is perfectly acceptable for the Mods to smurf and troll the boards, but woe betide anyone else who dares try it?

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-10-22 08:08pm

Just close this damn thread, already. It serves no purpose, whatsoever.

Stormbringer · Post by **Stormbringer** » 2002-10-22 08:11pm

Ender wrote:Lemme see if I have this all clear:

It is perfectly acceptable for the Mods to smurf and troll the boards, but woe betide anyone else who dares try it?

Ding ding ding. We have a winner.

Post by **Mr Bean** » 2002-10-22 08:17pm

It is perfectly acceptable for the Mods to smurf and troll the boards, but woe betide anyone else who dares try it?

Theres more to this story than you know and Starfleet has been pulling some John Clark Esk tricks and if Starfleet Anti-Treck=same person it would not be excused

Ender · Post by **Ender** » 2002-10-22 08:45pm

Well then please, englihten us as to the rest. Because as it stands right now it really only lends credence to the accusations by DS and his ilk.