Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

SWvST: the subject of the main site.

Moderator: Vympel

User avatar
Anarchist Bunny
Foul, Cruel, and Bad-Tempered Rodent
Posts: 5458
Joined: 2002-07-12 02:08am
Contact:

Post by Anarchist Bunny »

I think that that the debate is still strongly in the favor of Trek in the hearts of many idiot-trolls on the net. But they're too afraid of out "warsie wankfest" ejaculating flaming acid semen all over their styrofoam arguements to come here and show themselves.
//This Line Blank as of 7/15/07\\
Ornithology Subdirector: SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences
Wiilite
Image
User avatar
Romulan_nemesis
Youngling
Posts: 124
Joined: 2002-07-15 08:14pm
Location: Philadelphia

Post by Romulan_nemesis »

yup. Waiting for the scientific breakthrough that proves everything in Trek right. And buying to film to capture you guys on tape when you guys soil yourselves! :D

Actually, yeah. It's called Nemesis versus Episode III
Hillary Clinton for President:
http://www.votehillary.org/

Bob Casey for U.S. Senate
http://www.bobcaseyforpa.com/
Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi
What Kind of Username is That?
Posts: 9254
Joined: 2002-07-10 08:53pm
Location: Back in PA

Post by Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi »

What if the ICS didn't give that 200 gigaton figure? We probably wouldn't have all the Trekkies denouncing it.

Anyway, I'm annoyed by Trekkies insisting Saxton made these unmbers up to please Warsies. The 200 gigaton figure was taken from the minimum energy required for a BDZ, scaling methods, and content in EU material.
BotM: Just another monkey|HAB
User avatar
Anarchist Bunny
Foul, Cruel, and Bad-Tempered Rodent
Posts: 5458
Joined: 2002-07-12 02:08am
Contact:

Post by Anarchist Bunny »

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi wrote:What if the ICS didn't give that 200 gigaton figure? We probably wouldn't have all the Trekkies denouncing it.

Anyway, I'm annoyed by Trekkies insisting Saxton made these unmbers up to please Warsies. The 200 gigaton figure was taken from the minimum energy required for a BDZ, scaling methods, and content in EU material.
Ofcourse they wouldn't. Just like if we said that a Phase-Cloaked fleet of Fed Warships with End Game techcould be beaten easily by a chemical-weapon armed ISD with Sun Crusher armor, they would argue that we've never seen chemical weaponry on an ISD and there would be no way for them to gain that much of the metal in any concievable time frame.
//This Line Blank as of 7/15/07\\
Ornithology Subdirector: SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences
Wiilite
Image
User avatar
Setzer
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 3138
Joined: 2002-08-30 11:45am

Re: Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

Post by Setzer »

MKSheppard wrote:Well, is there?

I mean hell, we know Wars won a long time ago, and that what we see are
the pitiful last gasp rantings of a few die hard trektards....

So why do we keep coming to SD.net?

Is it the camaderie? is it the fun slapping down fundies, etc etc?

A classic from the ASVS archives....

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/rcrierie/ ... _admit.htm
TOWNBS admits that SW weapons are 32,000 times more powerful than ST ones
If TOWNMNBS admitted that, we have the final nail in ST's coffin. It seems rather tough luck that the debate was over before I could get in it seriously, but the STGOD is still loads of fun. BTW, Sheppard, what is that game you're displaying in your avatar window?
Image
User avatar
MKSheppard
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Ruthless Genocidal Warmonger
Posts: 29842
Joined: 2002-07-06 06:34pm

Re: Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

Post by MKSheppard »

Setzer wrote:BTW, Sheppard, what is that game you're displaying in your avatar window?
The Operational Art of War: Century of Warfare
"If scientists and inventors who develop disease cures and useful technologies don't get lifetime royalties, I'd like to know what fucking rationale you have for some guy getting lifetime royalties for writing an episode of Full House." - Mike Wong

"The present air situation in the Pacific is entirely the result of fighting a fifth rate air power." - U.S. Navy Memo - 24 July 1944
User avatar
Ender
Emperor's Hand
Posts: 11323
Joined: 2002-07-30 11:12pm
Location: Illinois

Re: Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

Post by Ender »

Setzer wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:Well, is there?

I mean hell, we know Wars won a long time ago, and that what we see are
the pitiful last gasp rantings of a few die hard trektards....

So why do we keep coming to SD.net?

Is it the camaderie? is it the fun slapping down fundies, etc etc?

A classic from the ASVS archives....

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/rcrierie/ ... _admit.htm
TOWNBS admits that SW weapons are 32,000 times more powerful than ST ones
If TOWNMNBS admitted that, we have the final nail in ST's coffin. It seems rather tough luck that the debate was over before I could get in it seriously, but the STGOD is still loads of fun. BTW, Sheppard, what is that game you're displaying in your avatar window?
I'm looking for the whole of that thread myslf. THat bit is inteesting, but I'd rather read all of it.
بيرني كان سيفوز
*
Nuclear Navy Warwolf
*
in omnibus requiem quaesivi, et nusquam inveni nisi in angulo cum libro
*
ipsa scientia potestas est
User avatar
Setzer
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 3138
Joined: 2002-08-30 11:45am

Re: Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

Post by Setzer »

MKSheppard wrote:
The Operational Art of War: Century of Warfare
Is it a Znes rom, or a computer game?
Image
User avatar
Vympel
Spetsnaz
Spetsnaz
Posts: 29312
Joined: 2002-07-19 01:08am
Location: Sydney Australia

Re: Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

Post by Vympel »

Setzer wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:
The Operational Art of War: Century of Warfare
Is it a Znes rom, or a computer game?
Computer Game. A FUCKING CLASSIC, I PROMISE YOU.
Like Legend of Galactic Heroes? Please contribute to http://gineipaedia.com/
User avatar
Setzer
Requiescat in Pace
Posts: 3138
Joined: 2002-08-30 11:45am

Re: Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

Post by Setzer »

Vympel wrote:
Setzer wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:
The Operational Art of War: Century of Warfare
Is it a Znes rom, or a computer game?
Computer Game. A FUCKING CLASSIC, I PROMISE YOU.
How can I get it? Is it for sale anywhere in Florida?
Image
User avatar
Anarchist Bunny
Foul, Cruel, and Bad-Tempered Rodent
Posts: 5458
Joined: 2002-07-12 02:08am
Contact:

Re: Is there any point in SW vs ST anymore?

Post by Anarchist Bunny »

Setzer wrote:
MKSheppard wrote:Well, is there?

I mean hell, we know Wars won a long time ago, and that what we see are
the pitiful last gasp rantings of a few die hard trektards....

So why do we keep coming to SD.net?

Is it the camaderie? is it the fun slapping down fundies, etc etc?

A classic from the ASVS archives....

http://mywebpages.comcast.net/rcrierie/ ... _admit.htm
TOWNBS admits that SW weapons are 32,000 times more powerful than ST ones
If TOWNMNBS admitted that, we have the final nail in ST's coffin. It seems rather tough luck that the debate was over before I could get in it seriously, but the STGOD is still loads of fun. BTW, Sheppard, what is that game you're displaying in your avatar window?
Accually, DarkStar would be the final nail, even TJ couldn't stand up to a smackdown from wong if what I hear is correct, much less a debate.
//This Line Blank as of 7/15/07\\
Ornithology Subdirector: SD.net Dept. of Biological Sciences
Wiilite
Image
Nashorn
Redshirt
Posts: 6
Joined: 2002-10-29 09:39pm

Post by Nashorn »

MKSheppard:

I've got CM (both BO and BB). That game fucking rules.

Nashorn
User avatar
Soontir C'boath
SG-14: Fuck the Medic!
Posts: 6844
Joined: 2002-07-06 12:15am
Location: Queens, NYC I DON'T FUCKING CARE IF MANHATTEN IS CONSIDERED NYC!! I'M IN IT ASSHOLE!!!
Contact:

Post by Soontir C'boath »

I think there is a point to all this.

There's still those "stupid" Trekkies that exists in the world. As long as they are there....we have to be here.

Cyaround,
Jason
I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Counciler or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who constantly says: "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action"; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a "more convenient season."
Post Reply