Word IQ Definition of SW vs ST

Mark S · Post by **Mark S** » 2004-10-17 08:58pm

I had never been over to darkstar's site before but followed the link from that article. I took a look at his feedback and it seemed like he had written it all himself to bash SDnet and glorify himself.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-10-18 12:21am

Mark S wrote:I had never been over to darkstar's site before but followed the link from that article. I took a look at his feedback and it seemed like he had written it all himself to bash SDnet and glorify himself.

That would be his general idea, yes.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2004-10-18 11:42am

Split of RSA rambling to the appropriate hideaway.

Grand Moff Yenchin · Post by **Grand Moff Yenchin** » 2004-10-26 04:35pm

Wiki SWvsST entry wrote: Star Trek versus Star Wars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This page has been listed for deletion.
Please see this page's entry on the votes for deletion page for justifications and discussion. If you don't want the page deleted, read the deletion policy and vote against its deletion. You may first wish to review some of the common deletion phrases. Please do not remove this notice or blank this page while the question is being considered. However, you are welcome to edit this article and improve it.

WTF??!!

Boyish-Tigerlilly · Post by **Boyish-Tigerlilly** » 2004-10-26 05:10pm

Utah Jak made the useless comment saying that being wars dominated was not a bad thing. I pointed out that this is not true and then Darksider contended that being wars dominated was a good thing. So you can sod off for all I care.

Well, from a perspective, it can be dominated by wars, and not be bad, as long as the domination is backed up by fact, but if they don't have the objective fact, and it's all misguided lies, then it's a bad thing. I don't think being dominated is good or bad, it's more the objectivity and the truth value. But I think that if a site only has wars, and it's intelligible in it's content, then it should be ok.