Er, what? 99% of 99%? Could you elaborate, please?Gustav32Vasa wrote:Well I was going to use very conservative numbers, like 99% of 99% until you guys told me that cubes has no hull.Batman wrote:Which makes it an exceptionally stupid material to use for what passes for 'armor' in Trek. And I have the distinct suspicion that those calculations where based on just as many false assumptions as Gustav32Vasa's were. Mind you, I haven't checked them yet so I may be doing the man a disservice.
99% are empty space, and of the 1 % that isn't 99% are still empty space? That's a weird way of putting it but that's certainly conservative
Or are you talking 1% of a % is Tritanium? While that's still mightily conservative I wish you good luck in finding out the density of the Cube.
And take a look at the bloody thing.
I certainly can't see a hull. And no offense intended, but your calculations fly in the face of every last E-D firepower calculation ever done (at least by reasonable people).