Bob the Gunslinger wrote:To be fair, could it have been "Leah," a biblical name?
Could have also been part of a tren of some kind, a pattern in naming kids - I've got a sister by the same name, who was predated by another, Lisa, which sort of sound quite good in conjunction. The next three, suitably enough, also begin with the letter L, as does my father's first name - Hell, the whole of my family, save for my mother, has their first name begin with L.
Granted, she
was born about two or three years after
Star Wars, but my parnts were never real
Star Wars fans - that's for me and my brother.
OP: I guess it would really have to depend upon the type of loyalty one's talking about. On one hand, you've got "I'll pledge my allegience to it as long as it doesn't do anything heinous" loyalty, which is the sensable sort of loyalty most people have - they are quite fond of the series, devote some resources to it, maybe go a bit overboard on said loyalty, but generally keep a good head about themselves. Here, I'd take a stab that
Wars' got the upper hand here, as the original films and the sheer amount of media that has been developed throughout the years has enabled it to spread to an incredably large fanbase.
Then, as we've so often seen and mocked, there's "I pledge my undying allegience to this show, will stand by through thick and thin, and devote the rest of my corporal existance to heralding its greatness" loyalty. Here,
Trek has definetily got the upper hand - at least in the eyes of the camera, in any case. While I wont deny there may exist those just as rabid and zealous about
Wars as any trekkie, they are sorely outnumbered by those who devote themselves to
Trek.
Overall, I'd place y bet on the
Wars fans.
This has been another blunder by you friendly local idiot.