[Darkstar] Trekkies read

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-09-16 07:28pm

To all Trekkies, Fivers and non-warsies:

DarkStar has said My "own side" gets positive responses from neutral parties and others." So he can't claim misquote, here it is on google.
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:thl ... ganews.com

So does he speak the truth? Do you agree with him, or not?

Robert Walper · Post by **Robert Walper** » 2002-09-16 07:39pm

Since I have virtually ignored all DarkStar material, other than mild curiousity and amusement, I'm incapable of casting an objective vote.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-09-16 10:00pm

I think that I CLEARLY demonstrated that neutrals and Trekkies do not think he is very reasonable. I still have not received even ONE PM regarding DarkStar as proving even reasonable doubt in my theories, and that was pretty much an acid test that was designed to be harder than any courtroom. If no one felt DarkStar won on any level, then he cannot possibly claim success on any front.

Post by **NecronLord** » 2002-09-17 08:03am

I voted

He is the Last Bastion of Trek, who will save us from the opressive warsies!

but only as a joke

Straha · Post by **Straha** » 2002-09-17 05:58pm

Whats master Wong's use group name?

tharkûn · Post by **tharkûn** » 2002-09-17 11:00pm

I think that I CLEARLY demonstrated that neutrals and Trekkies do not think he is very reasonable. I still have not received even ONE PM regarding DarkStar as proving even reasonable doubt in my theories, and that was pretty much an acid test that was designed to be harder than any courtroom. If no one felt DarkStar won on any level, then he cannot possibly claim success on any front.

I missed this challenge, but I do think Darkstar has raised some legitimate points on occassion. The problem is even if he's right he does things in such a moronic ass-backwards way I just can't bring myself to give a rat's ass what he says. As a "neutral" (as in fanatics on both sides overestimate their claims ... some more than others) I have to say a few times I have seen him raise good points ... and then make a general ass of himself whilst doing a piss poor job of defending them.

Any intelligent contribution he would possibly make has to pass through his delusions of grandeur and persecution complex; thus the world of Darkstar distinctly diverges from rationality and known reality.

Maybe if he grew some cajones - not pissing and moaning when people disagreed with him and called him names; started focusing on quality as opposed to quantity; and most importantly dropped the damn hypocracy I might take the time to read him more (still a big might as he is piss boring to read). As it is now, I ignore him ... you'd think he's the only one here who doesn't buy the Gospel According to Wong in total or the only one called names by Rabid Warsie Morons.

Classic example of a Troglodytus moronicus.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-09-17 11:08pm

Problem with many of his theories--though not all of them, is that he cannot really defend them because they are not true. He just keeps digging himself deeper and deeper, but he never gets anywhere. With the rest of his theories, he still can't defend them because most of the time they are short-sighted, or he ends up proving the opposite of what he intends.

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2002-09-18 05:48am

Okay since Darkstar was banned, who the fuck voted him as "Last Bastion of Trek"?!?

You are aware of what bastion means right?

bas·tion Pronunciation Key (bschn, -t-n)
n.
A projecting part of a fortification.
A well-fortified position.
One that is considered similar to a defensive stronghold: You are a bastion of strength

How in the name of zeus butthole do you consider Darkstar a well-fortified defense of Star Trek?

His Divine Shadow · Post by **His Divine Shadow** » 2002-09-18 07:42am

Kamakazie Sith wrote:Okay since Darkstar was banned, who the fuck voted him as "Last Bastion of Trek"?!?

He himself

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2002-09-18 09:40am

Kamakazie Sith wrote:Okay since Darkstar was banned, who the fuck voted him as "Last Bastion of Trek"?!?

Scroll up about three or four posts

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2002-09-18 10:42am

Crayz9000 wrote:
Kamakazie Sith wrote:Okay since Darkstar was banned, who the fuck voted him as "Last Bastion of Trek"?!?
Scroll up about three or four posts

Yeah I should have looked, it just took me by surprise.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-09-18 11:46am

Kamakazie Sith wrote:
Yeah I should have looked, it just took me by surprise.

But there's THREE votes! Who are the other two?

Post by **NecronLord** » 2002-09-18 11:52am

What can I say about it, I voted in a sarcastic maner

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2002-09-18 12:57pm

Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:
Kamakazie Sith wrote:
Yeah I should have looked, it just took me by surprise.

But there's THREE votes! Who are the other two?

Indeed, who are the other two? Quickly, we must seek them out and destroy them. To the "Rational Thought Mobile" Grand Admiral Thrawn Man!

Post by **Dalton** » 2002-09-18 05:29pm

Kamakazie Sith wrote:
Grand Admiral Thrawn wrote:
Kamakazie Sith wrote:
Yeah I should have looked, it just took me by surprise.
But there's THREE votes! Who are the other two?
Indeed, who are the other two? Quickly, we must seek them out and destroy them. To the "Rational Thought Mobile" Grand Admiral Thrawn Man!

LOLOLOL!!!!!!

FUQ

Post by **The Yosemite Bear** » 2002-09-18 09:17pm

I am one of ASVS's Neutrals.

I am a Raving fan of the TOS trek, the Gorn, Horta, Orions and Tholians being favorites.

I saw Starwars when It first came out.

Failed Glory · Post by **Failed Glory** » 2002-09-19 12:31pm

tharkûn wrote:
I missed this challenge, but I do think Darkstar has raised some legitimate points on occassion. The problem is even if he's right he does things in such a moronic ass-backwards way I just can't bring myself to give a rat's ass what he says. As a "neutral" (as in fanatics on both sides overestimate their claims ... some more than others) I have to say a few times I have seen him raise good points ... and then make a general ass of himself whilst doing a piss poor job of defending them.

Any intelligent contribution he would possibly make has to pass through his delusions of grandeur and persecution complex; thus the world of Darkstar distinctly diverges from rationality and known reality.

A million Darkstars on a million computers will eventually write something intelligible.

You have to give it to the guy for entertaining us, though.

Eleas · Post by **Eleas** » 2002-09-19 06:22pm

Dalton wrote:
Kamakazie Sith wrote: Indeed, who are the other two? Quickly, we must seek them out and destroy them. To the "Rational Thought Mobile" Grand Admiral Thrawn Man!
LOLOLOL!!!!!!

FUQ

I think this marks a turning point in ASVS history.

Kamakazie Sith · Post by **Kamakazie Sith** » 2002-09-19 06:41pm

Eleas wrote:
Dalton wrote:
Kamakazie Sith wrote: Indeed, who are the other two? Quickly, we must seek them out and destroy them. To the "Rational Thought Mobile" Grand Admiral Thrawn Man!
LOLOLOL!!!!!!

FUQ
I think this marks a turning point in ASVS history.

Oh yeah? In what way?

Eleas · Post by **Eleas** » 2002-09-19 09:30pm

Kamakazie Sith wrote:
Eleas wrote:
Dalton wrote: LOLOLOL!!!!!!

FUQ
I think this marks a turning point in ASVS history.
Oh yeah? In what way?

The point where Rob officially FUQs a post over at SD.net, IIRC.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

[Darkstar] Trekkies read

What do you think of Darkstar Non-warsies?

[Darkstar] Trekkies read