New ST-V-SW Site!

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2004-11-21 05:48pm

Anyone have any idea who Mr.Preachy is from that board?

Cyborg Stan · Post by **Cyborg Stan** » 2004-11-21 05:54pm

Oh, and for the Bands...

From RSA debate archived on SD.net (Look for the pictures)

Or, if he argues that SD.net isn't a relaible record...

From Google Groups

And here is it from his page from Archive.Org - Link in case his current page doesn't mention it. At the moment, I'm still trying to find if Archive.Org stored the revalent pictures as well, but there doesn't seem to be any luck.

Tribun · Post by **Tribun** » 2004-11-21 06:32pm

BTW, Darkstar updated his page today.

The usual mocking and trying to spit on SW.

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2004-11-21 06:41pm

From RSA debate archived on SD.net (Look for the pictures)

Yeah, technically, he didn't call them "bands of brightness" (there)... he simply calls them "bright bands".

Maybe he was referring to unusually intelligent musicians? Wow, he's so smart. I'm agape.

Lord Poe · Post by **Lord Poe** » 2004-11-21 06:54pm

Hm, I even offered to send him a Christmas present. He took it as a threat...

Rightous Fist Of Heaven · Post by **Rightous Fist Of Heaven** » 2004-11-21 07:24pm

Lord Poe wrote:Hm, I even offered to send him a Christmas present. He took it as a threat...

Ofcourse he did! We are all out to get him remember?

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2004-11-21 10:01pm

SirNitram wrote:This is why I have mostly retired from SWvST. All the intelligent Pro-Trek debators retired from the main debate(Alyeska, Chris, etc). And all you're left with now are retards who won't concede a tiny point.

Ah shucks, you really know how to make someone feel good.

Post by **Dalton** » 2004-11-21 10:09pm

Lord Poe wrote:Hm, I even offered to send him a Christmas present. He took it as a threat...

Send him a copy of the SW2ICS and watch him melt!

Alyeska wrote:Whoever called Darkstart a mod is a real dim bulb. He isn't, nor is he an admin.

Oh, bite me.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2004-11-21 11:04pm

Tribun wrote:BTW, Darkstar updated his page today.

The usual mocking and trying to spit on SW.

Of course he did. This debate is the most important thing in his life, remember?

aerius · Post by **aerius** » 2004-11-21 11:50pm

It would be more accurate to say the debate is his life.

Praxis · Post by **Praxis** » 2004-11-21 11:53pm

Dalton wrote:
Lord Poe wrote:Hm, I even offered to send him a Christmas present. He took it as a threat...
Send him a copy of the SW2ICS and watch him melt!

Alyeska wrote:Whoever called Darkstart a mod is a real dim bulb. He isn't, nor is he an admin.
Oh, bite me.

Well, some lurker here (aka DarkStar) has been reading this thread and made a big deal over how dumb we are calling him an admin

Post by **Vympel** » 2004-11-22 12:12am

Latest Trektard argument: X-Wing's may have reclining seats, so the pilots wouldn't get fatigued in that alleged days long trip to Endor in ROTJ

Pcm979 · Post by **Pcm979** » 2004-11-22 12:16am

Does that mean that because Star Trek ships don't have seatbelts they never go fast enough to experience acceleration?

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2004-11-22 01:11am

Vympel wrote:Latest Trektard argument: X-Wing's may have reclining seats, so the pilots wouldn't get fatigued in that alleged days long trip to Endor in ROTJ

wtf?

Is he saying that because cars have reclining seats, people must not get tired from driving them for days on end?

KhyronTheBackstabber · Post by **KhyronTheBackstabber** » 2004-11-22 01:18am

Pcm979 wrote:Does that mean that because Star Trek ships don't have seatbelts they never go fast enough to experience acceleration?

Don't give them any ideas.

Rogue 9 · Post by **Rogue 9** » 2004-11-22 01:42am

+http://www.strek-v-swars.net/phpBB2/vie ... =2253#2253

Pwned.

Post by **Dalton** » 2004-11-22 01:44am

Praxis wrote:Well, some lurker here (aka DarkStar) has been reading this thread and made a big deal over how dumb we are calling him an admin

Like I give a shit? He can lick my ass. I love how he so high and mightily criticizes Mike for having "spies" while he has his own little cadre of sychophants and goons.

Lord Poe · Post by **Lord Poe** » 2004-11-22 02:06am

Praxis wrote:Well, some lurker here (aka DarkStar) has been reading this thread and made a big deal over how dumb we are calling him an admin

Well, of course. He lives his life through us. His existence is so sad and pathetic because he HAS no life. He's here daily, 24/7, too cowardly to actually reveal himself, and he's taking notes, collecting pictures, etc. All his little files, all of Mike's anal sex antic, everything.

Recall, when he was here, he never really strayed from the VS board; never tried to be part of a community. Here, or anywhere. This is his life. A sad, sad little cocksucker that wishes he'd be invited into our community, or ANY community. No, he has to live through us, forever a voyeur. And cry, cry, cry himself to sleep. Every night.

Lord Poe · Post by **Lord Poe** » 2004-11-22 02:17am

Hey, guess what? For combatting Dipshit, I've been banned! Nope, ya can't badmouth daddy! LOL!!

Funny thing is, they sent me a P.M. to read. But...how can I read it if I'm banned? So curious...

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2004-11-22 02:29am

Lord Poe wrote:Hey, guess what? For combatting Dipshit, I've been banned! Nope, ya can't badmouth daddy! LOL!!

Funny thing is, they sent me a P.M. to read. But...how can I read it if I'm banned? So curious...

Is there anyway you can find out what their "reasoning" was? Besides, I thought that at least one of the "strikes" against you was totally bogus.

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2004-11-22 02:56am

Well, some lurker here (aka DarkStar) has been reading this thread and made a big deal over how dumb we are calling him an admin

"We"? He must have a pretty high opinion of Dalton, though the "Royal We" is best left for self-reference.

But then again, we've always known him to be as bright as those bands that he "never" saw.

Meest · Post by **Meest** » 2004-11-22 03:45am

Don't want to steal Vympels thunder, but here's some properties of sandstone,

The compressive strength and deformability of sandstone is influenced by its porosity, the amount and type of cement, and/or matrix material, grain contact and composition. Siliceous cement is stronger than calcareous cemented sandstones.

Pore water plays a significant role in the compressive strength and deformation characteristics of a sandstone. It can reduce the unconfined compressive strength by 30 to 60%.

The unique stones are a type of rock that geologists call "concretions", and their formation has to do with a variaton in the type of cement that holds the sandstone together. In order for sand to become stone, the grains of sand must be cemented together. Minerals dissolved in groundwater typically do the trick. Calcite (calcium carbonate) is the most common cement for sandstone. But, since calcite can be dissolved by rainwater, sandstone is eroded away fairly easily. However, with the sandstone that concretions are made of the cement is not calcite, but rather a more durable iron compound (iron pyrite or hematite).

In literally dozens of places, the exterior sandstone is deteriorating – the surfaces of the stones are flaking off. Here, too, water is the problem. Tom S. Patty, a petrographic studies consultant from Austin, writes in the Master Plan, “A reduction of water exposure from leaky downspouts and contact with soil should help reduce future deterioration.”

That being said,

I don't think a spaceport with pipes/drains would want walls made out of packed dirt or natural sandstone.

Sure the docking bay was dug a few feet into the ground, though that doesn't make the walls dirt as Praxis noted.

Lord Poe · Post by **Lord Poe** » 2004-11-22 05:36am

Good job of kicking the shit out of Darkstar's vast knowledge of dirt, Vympel!

LOL!!!

Anyway, let me answer Dipshit's last post to me:

So, 'if sparks then not-cloth-covered-flesh' . . . a claim for which you have no evidence.

Other than the wall near Leia's arm, my evidence is one again, the Imperial shot in the DS control room, and the Imperials sho in the detention block. Think you can remember them now, you stupid motherfucker?

You're the only one who needs metal armor there, since you're clinging to the 'if sparks then not-cloth-covered-flesh' BS,

Ooh, look at all the sparks! Oh..wait..

It should be noted that you have no explanation for those sparks near Leia's arm. Are those a Magical Reaction, too? Fucking jackass.

2. Proving that humans in the Star Wars galaxy are born with metal plates under their skin. (Oh that's right, you still haven't proved that one.)
Why would I want to prove that? It wasn't my claim . . .

Yet you offer no explanation for those sparks near Leia's arm...

however, as you acknowledged upon conceding the AT-ST driver hit.

I never conceded that, Scooter.

"On cloth covered flesh, which created a firey wound much like Leia's in one instance..." . . . . Wayne Poe, Nov. 21, 10:08p GMT

You see, little secretary boy, once again you prove that your reading skills are on par with a retard after his lobotomy. The instance I was referring to was, once AGAIN, shit for brains,
this one:

You're once again trying to buttrape Occam by assuming light armor.

Oh no...Occam's Razor clearly dictates that human just spark if you hit them with a blaster bolt. Armor would be a preposterous useage of OR..

You need a bitchslapping.

You're basically repeating

The truth of the matter never gets old. Trolling pussies like you however, do.

No, that's you, arguing for this Warren Commission

Boy, you cling on to a catch phrase with both hands, don't you? How many more times are you going to use "Warren Commission"? Will you fall back on your favorite quip by me, the "monkey throwing feces" one you repeated several times after you read it? Its so easy to entertain a moron like you.

You're the one who should be embarrassed, since I never said anything of the sort. You should replace my name in the page with "Spanky the Dolphin", who developed that weird little idea.

Darkstar
Posted: Sat Aug 17, 2002 8:37 pm
"Even if we assume that this is an accurate, X-ray-like representation of his bone structure via the use of Force Lightning, it would not preclude the possibility of something simply covering (reinforcing) the relevant bones.

Of course, given that we have nothing to compare it to, it may simply represent the natural order of the dominant humanoids of the SW galaxy."

Sorry, fuckup. You posted that yourself. Its right here in the board archive. Its so fucking stupid even YOU can't believe you said it. =snicker= Poor dimwitted son of a bitch....

You voted for George Bush, didn't you? Admit it.

Yes, and cackled maniacally when he won, since I knew your News and Politics freaks would cry.

(Actually, I didn't vote at all . . . but typing the above was more fun.)
Fishing expedition complete. Yes, we know you are obsessed with everyone here, spending hours on this board following your betters...

It figures that you're a Republican. Just like there's no WMDs, there's no "bands of brightness" either...

Thanks, Wayne. I couldn't have asked for better.

Let's all look at the Hotel Sidi Driss, shall we?:
Oh, I bet by now you're thinking feverishly of the many ways you can possibly spin-doctor yourself out of this DIRT PIT you've stumbled into! I was banned before I could respond, but Vympel handed you your ass devastatingly on this one!

And so on. They even have a phone number. Maybe I should call them . . . "I'm certain they'd be pleased to learn that the American educational system produced a fucking retard who thinks people in Tunisia" used concrete in the 17th Century.

Yeah, and then maybe you can explain to them what a fucking retard you are, since you're equating the Lars homestead picture with DB 94! Jesus fucking Christ you're a grade A moron. The Lars picture was there to show you the difference between building materials which you couldn't grasp. The DB 94 illustrated that those walls were solid "concrete" and not "packed dirt" as you so laughably claim! I wish I could call you a fucking asshole to your face. I really do.

DarkSilver · Post by **DarkSilver** » 2004-11-22 05:50am

....one question....

why do people lookup to him again?

I'm not that well vested in any one particular branch of science (just a general all roundedness if you would) but even I don't beleive half the shit he spouts....

GeneralTacticus · Post by **GeneralTacticus** » 2004-11-22 05:57am

Because it's very easy to believe an utter bullshitter if you want to believe what he says. In this case, we have people who absolutely, positively refuse to accept that Star Trek could possibly be 'inferior' to any other fictional world (even in areas that have little or no bearing on actual quality, like relative military power), so they latch onto anyone who ca offer a reasonable-sounding argument in their favour. The fact that when examined it makes no sense is irrelevant.