wow, the star destroyer

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2002-12-21 02:06am

though the possiblity does exist this a honest moron who can't read.

Darth Servo · Post by **Darth Servo** » 2002-12-21 02:16am

Ghost Rider wrote:though the possiblity does exist this a honest moron who can't read.

Trek does tend to produce those type of fans these days doesn't it.

Post by **Darth Wong** » 2002-12-21 02:38am

Vympel wrote:This is obviously an anti-troll drill. Will the mod responsible please stand up?

IP doesn't match anybody else on the board. I think it's a genuine idiot. Has anybody else noticed that the idiots tend not to capitalize the words in their names?

Post by **Vympel** » 2002-12-21 05:08am

Maybe it's indicative of their inherent lack of self esteem, and needing Trek to bolster it for them ... or something

nightmare · Post by **nightmare** » 2002-12-21 07:35am

*cough cough*

XaLEv · Post by **XaLEv** » 2002-12-21 08:39am

nightmare wrote:*cough cough*

.........

Are you saying you are an idiot?

Xon · Post by **Xon** » 2002-12-21 08:41am

Wong, in most cases that seems to be the case. Probable because they cant be bothered using the shift key or only know how to use the Caps-key and having to toggle the Caps-lock on& off all the time is too much

However not all the time

I dont capatalize this nick, I think it is too short for it & "Ggs" looks kind of stupid.

nightmare · Post by **nightmare** » 2002-12-21 09:04am

XaLEv wrote:
nightmare wrote:*cough cough*

.........

Are you saying you are an idiot?

Hardly. I'm just pointing out the dangers of generalizations. Not to Mr Wong though, I belive he knows them far too well already.

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2002-12-21 01:16pm

Doesn't discount this particular trektard who is showing how much of a moron one can be and who doesn't have the two neurons firing to read the site.

beyond hope · Post by **beyond hope** » 2002-12-21 01:55pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Vympel wrote:This is obviously an anti-troll drill. Will the mod responsible please stand up?
IP doesn't match anybody else on the board. I think it's a genuine idiot. Has anybody else noticed that the idiots tend not to capitalize the words in their names?

My name isn't capitalized either...

*slinks off to nurse my wounded pride back to health*

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2002-12-21 01:56pm

I knew he was an idiot troll when he said "3.5 jouldsfaggots" on the first page.

Someone like that needs a good pounding. I'm just sad that I missed all the fun.

porkboy696 · Post by **porkboy696** » 2002-12-21 02:06pm

Darth Servo wrote:Porkboy's posts in a nutshell:
wow, i just saw nemesis, and the schimitar is a very powerful ship, i always thought a star destroyer would have a tough time with a romulan warbird (which is almost the same size as a ISD) and the enterprise, but there is no way a ISD could even take the schimitar. the cloak, 50 disruptor cannons, 2 dozen torpedo bays, a backup shield system, damn, what do u think of a star destroyer vs. schimitar, i say schimitar by a whole lot.
1) He thinks that an ISD is about equal in power to a Romulan warbird because they are about the same size. This is wrong because the size of the ship has NOTHING to do with how powerful it is. S8472 ships are smaller than borg cubes, yet they are more powerful.

i just pointed out that they are nearly identical size, it in no way means they it is more powerful, just a fact. the defiant took out ships bigger than itself many times.

2) He lists all the Schimitar's capabilities but never says how powerful they are. On modern day soldier with a machine gun can take out hundreds of stick wielding cavemen.

we don't know how powerful they are, there are no official numbers, maybe i can guess as all u do about star trek weaponary.

2) You assume that it is just as easy to hit a tiny 40 meter target like the falcon as it would be to hid a 600 meter GCS or a 1200 meter Warbird. Please justify this assumption.

assumption, well well. if the star destroyer is as wonderful and powerful as u say, shouldn't it easily be able to?

3) We know that Star Destroyers are more powerful than the Scimitar because they have accomplished feats requiring greater power, like melting the surface of planets in some of the novels (Base Delta Zero operation) while a GCS needs maximum fire just to drill a hole in the crust.

sorry, never read a star trek book. star trek ships have that power power too, in star trek armada in the opening animation, a cardasian ship is clearly taking out an entire planet with it's primary weapon.

wow, i just read the "star wars vs. star trek in five minutes" very interesting, now are all those facts about megawats and 3.5 jouldsfaggots or whatever concrete published facts? have both the star trek universe and the star wars universe come out with those facts? that was real interesting.
The 200 gigaton figure for Star Wars is an official Star Wars fact from Episode 2 Incredible Cross Sections. However, if you had read the entire document, you would learn the page gives figures from the official literature AND calculations of observed events in both universes from the movies and TV episodes.

ok, now i know u guys have concrete facts about the star wars universe, now where are the sources for your star trek information?

i thought so, thank u sir. i knew those facts couldn't have been true, i mean, i saw return of the jedi, and that tiny little a-wing ship rammed the bridge of that larger star destroyer, and destroyed it. if the shields are as powerful as that article said, it shouda stopped it. well, thanks for clearing that up. i say schimitar wins but not by a whole lot.
You totally missed the point. They ARE true figures for the respective universes.
And how could you possibly conclude that the A-wing "destroyed" the Executer? The bridge was destroyed, but the ship itself was still intact and fighting. It has the bad luck of crashing into the Death Star.

bad luck? intact and fighting? the entire rebel fleet was cheering, so obviously it was a fatal blow. intact and fighting? haha, i saw it burning and crashing cuz it couldn't operate no more, no luck invovled.

really? u know what? i saw the empire hits back, and in that one, i remember a scene where there is a big fleet of star destroyers is going thru an asteroid field, and one hits a star destroyer and destroys the top part of it? anyone else remember that? i don't think it was damaged by "concentrated rebel fire", so with those powerful shields that are like 70 trillion zw's, shouldn't it have reflected it or something? just a little confusing, well, thanks
1) The name of the film is "The Empire Strikes Back", not hits.

hahaha

2) Prove that that one asteroid was the only collision in the chase.

how do i prove that? i watched the movie, saw an asteriod take out the star destryoer, wat is ther to prove?

3) Prove that the Star Destroyer in question had not been damaged in the attack on Hoth.

i don't know about that, the battle was a while back, they had time to repair. plus, we never saw any ships damaged during the battle of hoth, not one.

4) They had to lower their shields to holotransmit with Vader.

i thought vade was on the superstar destroyer? so every ship in the fleet has to lower their shields? it was a regular star destroyer that got destroyed by the asteriod, not vaders ship. and even that guy told vader they were taking heavy damage.

5) Quantify exactly how much damage was done to the Star Destroyer by that asteroid. The view of bridge structure is completely blocked by the asteroid debris and the scene changes before the debris disperses so you cannot say that the top was destroyed.

well, i heard that admiral say "we are taking heavy damage" so i must assume that it did wat it looked like it did.

can someone just tell me if the facts that i'm being given are concrete and published somewhere or pure speculation? thats all i want to know then ill be on my way
The 200 gigaton statement for Star Wars firepower is a concrete published figure in Star Wars, Episode 2 Incredible Cross Sections.

ok, thank u, now where are the star trek facts? thats all i want to know

porkboy696 · Post by **porkboy696** » 2002-12-21 02:12pm

Darth Wong wrote:
Vympel wrote:This is obviously an anti-troll drill. Will the mod responsible please stand up?
IP doesn't match anybody else on the board. I think it's a genuine idiot. Has anybody else noticed that the idiots tend not to capitalize the words in their names?

why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.

porkboy696 · Post by **porkboy696** » 2002-12-21 02:13pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I knew he was an idiot troll when he said "3.5 jouldsfaggots" on the first page.

Someone like that needs a good pounding. I'm just sad that I missed all the fun.

why does that need a good pouding? tell me

Post by **Ghost Rider** » 2002-12-21 02:19pm

porkboy696 wrote:why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Ah street lingo on the internet...now there's what you don't see often

Also for Star Trek since Paramount only allows the TV and Movies as canon you have to make your own calcs.

Darth Yoshi · Post by **Darth Yoshi** » 2002-12-21 03:13pm

porkboy696 wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
Vympel wrote:This is obviously an anti-troll drill. Will the mod responsible please stand up?
IP doesn't match anybody else on the board. I think it's a genuine idiot. Has anybody else noticed that the idiots tend not to capitalize the words in their names?
why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.

You and whose army? And he didn't call you an idiot per se; just because your typing skills would fail English class doesn't mean you're an idiot.

beyond hope · Post by **beyond hope** » 2002-12-21 03:21pm

porkboy696 wrote:
Darth Wong wrote:
Vympel wrote:This is obviously an anti-troll drill. Will the mod responsible please stand up?
IP doesn't match anybody else on the board. I think it's a genuine idiot. Has anybody else noticed that the idiots tend not to capitalize the words in their names?
why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.

Congradulations, you just threatened the owner of this forum (and incidently left us in doubt that your "Village Idiot" title will be richly deserved.)

Cpt_Frank · Post by **Cpt_Frank** » 2002-12-21 03:31pm

why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.

A great many morons tend to use this funny way to spell.
And quite actually, you are an idiot because you do nothing but sprout shit.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2002-12-21 03:56pm

porkboy696 wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I knew he was an idiot troll when he said "3.5 jouldsfaggots" on the first page.

Someone like that needs a good pounding. I'm just sad that I missed all the fun.
why does that need a good pouding? tell me

Are you fucking brain-dead or something?

It's somewhat insulting and indicative that you're and idiot to refer to something like jouls as "3.5 jouldsfaggots".

You don't see something wrong with that?

HemlockGrey · Post by **HemlockGrey** » 2002-12-21 04:16pm

why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.

...says the man who probably can't even hold a gun.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2002-12-21 04:23pm

Ooh, a hollow threat across the Internet!! How totally pathetic!!

Now I am convinced you are an idiot. Or that you're 12.

Post by **Alyrium Denryle** » 2002-12-21 04:34pm

No determination has ever been made that isoton means equal to one ton of TNT.

ISOton means SINGULAR ton It is either 200 isotons of antimatter, which is impossible given the size of the torp(2 meters long, 1 meter wide, 1/3 of a meter deep, complete with propulsion system, and guidance, not muh room) and the type antimater they most likely use(hydrogen IIRC)

So that leaves the other option, isoton means the actuasl yield, this is in line with the quote from voyager, nd kind of in line with other instances in TNG, when the shields of the enterprise where brought down by 60 gigawatts of energy.

porkboy696 · Post by **porkboy696** » 2002-12-21 04:43pm

Darth Yoshi wrote:
porkboy696 wrote:
Darth Wong wrote: IP doesn't match anybody else on the board. I think it's a genuine idiot. Has anybody else noticed that the idiots tend not to capitalize the words in their names?
why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.
You and whose army? And he didn't call you an idiot per se; just because your typing skills would fail English class doesn't mean you're an idiot.

my typing skills are fine, i just choose to type a certain way to be different from the rest. but thank u for correcting yourself, that shows signs of a mature man who knows when to admit his downfalls.

porkboy696 · Post by **porkboy696** » 2002-12-21 04:45pm

Cpt_Frank wrote:
why am i an idiot, just cuz i capitalize means im an idiot? you are shallow mothafucka. boy, u lucky i don't know u or, i'd cap you ass so fast. you call me an idiot? who are u to call me an idiot u little cocksucker, go back to your momma's basement before i beat your ass down.
A great many morons tend to use this funny way to spell.
And quite actually, you are an idiot because you do nothing but sprout shit.

a great many moron? haha, i must show more of the words u just said. sprout shit? and what do u do that makes you special?

porkboy696 · Post by **porkboy696** » 2002-12-21 04:47pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:
porkboy696 wrote:
Spanky The Dolphin wrote:I knew he was an idiot troll when he said "3.5 jouldsfaggots" on the first page.

Someone like that needs a good pounding. I'm just sad that I missed all the fun.
why does that need a good pouding? tell me
Are you fucking brain-dead or something?

It's somewhat insulting and indicative that you're and idiot to refer to something like jouls as "3.5 jouldsfaggots".

You don't see something wrong with that?

insulting and indicative? what do you care son? like it really affects you somehow? i see nothing wrong with that, and your quite a sensitive little thing to be hurt like that.