Alright, this New Republic vs Rebel Alliance crap isnt getting anything productive out of it. As for the two pts of contention, I admit its rather subjective, but for me I'll put it as:Nick Lancaster wrote:Right. But when, precisely, did this increase in fleet size occur? The Rebel Alliance basically dubbed themselves the New Republic after the Battle of Endor - but there was no sudden acquisition or production of ships. Hence, my assertion that they are, at that point in time, functionally the same.Rommie2006 wrote:Nice of you to say that, thanks. I do admit when I have made a mistake in numbers. Anyway since when did I "insist that there's some kind of magic transformation or accrual of ships"? I only said that the New Republic cannot be equal to the Rebel Alliance because their fleet size is significantly larger than the Rebel Alliance. Perhaps you thought I implied it?
It is only a few posts back that you indicated you were thinking of the NJO timeframe, where the New Republic has had more than a decade (almost two) to expand and develop new fighters, new spaceframes, and so on.
Fair enough.Look I wont (and I never did) contest the fact that the New Republic(immediately following Endor) and the Rebel Alliance are almost equal in military strength.
So the point of contention has been:I am contesting your claim (quote 1st post: When folks say, oh, I was talking about the Rebel Alliance, not the New Republic ... what, pray tell, did you think the New Republic was? It's the Rebel Alliance, pinheads. ), which I take it as the entire span of the reign of the New Republic since you *did not* mention which timeframe.
A - When did the Rebel Alliance become the New Republic.
B - At what point did the New Republic accomplish significant production or other acquisition (capture, etc.) of capital ships?
As I kept mentioning the Battle of Endor, it would seem clear about which time frame I was talking about, but I can understand your not seeing it in quite the same way. However, for years after the Battle of Endor (as measured by watching things like the growing Organa-Solo clan), the New Republic did not significantly advance in ship strength.
So it may be a semantic issue, but the overall strength of 'New Republic' for several years following the Battle of Endor was not significantly greater than that of the 'Rebel Alliance.'
The former is false, the latter is true. We're done. Now, let's discuss strategies that would make it possible for Trek to go out fighting, perhaps?So if you are going to continue to assert that the New Republic (in NJO and beyond) is equal to Rebel Alliance, I say bullshit. If all the while you have been yakking about New Republic(after Endor) = Rebel Alliance, then you get no argument from me.
Can we assume that the Rebels will engage in the same guerilla tactics used against the Empire, that is, hit-and-run, covert missions of infiltration and sabotage? How would Section 31 or the Obsidian Order stack up to that? Would Leia prove as resistant to a Klingon Mind Sifter as to an Imperial Interrogation Droid?
What worlds would you consider prime targets, and how would you defend them?
Given the seeming disparity in Federation weapon output vs. Republic shield/defensive capabilities, how do you approach combat to negate or minimize this factor?
Or, as some have suggested, is it a foregone conclusion and the Republic wins, regardless?
A - When did the Rebel Alliance become the New Republic? Technically immediately after Palpy died. But I consider them to *truly* become the New Republic much later in EU, around NJO period, where the Imperial Renmants were beaten back to a corner in the galaxy.
B - At what point did the New Republic accomplish significant production or other acquisition (capture, etc.) of capital ships? Presumably more than 5 years after ROTJ, cos if they did not acquire significant industrial capabilities, I doubt that the Rebel-Endor fleet would have managed to hold off the Yuuzhan Yong in NJO for that long.
Of course, to each his own opinion.
And regarding the Trek-Alliance vs Rebel Alliance(referring to pre-Endor fleet strength), and now knowing that I had erroneously added an extra zero to the Trek fleet strength, I think Trek is gonna have a hard time taking down the Rebels.
While I still believe Trek with their numerical superiority can wreck quite a havoc in the Rebel colonies(which I assume to be a handful), there's nothing really stopping the Rebels from doing a BDZ of every planet in the Trek Alliance, aka Scorch Earth policy. Trek would have too many planets to defend, and their ships would be stretched out far too thinly.