Feddy Phasers

Zed Snardbody · Post by **Zed Snardbody** » 2002-07-16 03:07am

I foud this floating around the internet.

This is not mine! I do not take credit for it, I thought you might want to see it though. If this does belong to you, email me and I'll be glad to take it down if you like.

http://www.geocities.com/agentzs/phasers.art

sorry about the geocities, its free, what can I say

SPOOFE · Post by **SPOOFE** » 2002-07-16 08:10am

I believe someone at Spacebattles created that one. Might've been Alyeska. He made a few of his own pictures of phasers that looked more "ergonomic" than those depicted in the show.

Although I've always wondered why a phaser - an energy weapon - had a clip of bullets...

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-07-16 09:19am

That's either Alyeska's or Chris's

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2002-07-16 05:38pm

Alyeska

2000AD · Post by **2000AD** » 2002-07-16 05:53pm

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

GOD WHO MADE THIS

HAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

*calms down*

That's one of the funniest things i've seen. To me it looks like a modified M16 to me

*snigger*

This must have been another Trekkie Masturbating Fantasy. I have never seen a Phaser with a trigger guard or a ammo clip, and only the one that seems to have a scope and/or a shoulder stock is the one in STFC.

And sice when could you take a scope off and have "2-bumpies" come up?

And since when do you get a flashlight attached to your "targeting array". As far as I know flashlights are generally under the barrel.

Sorry I can't help it...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2002-07-16 06:05pm

Like we've never abstractly thought about how we'd improve an ISD...

I do like the totally unmodified STANAG magazine though

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-07-16 06:32pm

2000AD wrote:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

GOD WHO MADE THIS

HAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

*calms down*

That's one of the funniest things i've seen. To me it looks like a modified M16 to me

*snigger*

This must have been another Trekkie Masturbating Fantasy. I have never seen a Phaser with a trigger guard or a ammo clip, and only the one that seems to have a scope and/or a shoulder stock is the one in STFC.

And sice when could you take a scope off and have "2-bumpies" come up?

And since when do you get a flashlight attached to your "targeting array". As far as I know flashlights are generally under the barrel.

Sorry I can't help it...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

Oh like Warsies have never fixed SW bad designs?

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2002-07-16 06:47pm

Beat ya GAT.

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-07-16 06:53pm

I'm just amazed that the trekkies need a flashlight. Couldn't they just put on one of Geordi's visors and be able to see in the dark perfectly? And how come it looks like a flashlight?

Crayz9000 · Post by **Crayz9000** » 2002-07-16 07:45pm

2000AD wrote: This must have been another Trekkie Masturbating Fantasy. I have never seen a Phaser with a trigger guard or a ammo clip, and only the one that seems to have a scope and/or a shoulder stock is the one in STFC.

A power cell doesn't need to have a curve to it. It's just a battery, after all, and curving it--especially in such a manner to interfere with the forward handhold--is absurd.

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-07-16 07:47pm

Howedar wrote:Beat ya GAT.

Damn you

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-07-16 07:51pm

2000AD wrote: This must have been another Trekkie Masturbating Fantasy. I have never seen a Phaser with a trigger guard or a ammo clip, and only the one that seems to have a scope and/or a shoulder stock is the one in STFC.

The rifle in STFC (all 3) had trigger guards.

VF5SS · Post by **VF5SS** » 2002-07-16 07:52pm

Crayz9000 wrote: A power cell doesn't need to have a curve to it. It's just a battery, after all, and curving it--especially in such a manner to interfere with the forward handhold--is absurd.

Hehe, Trekkies can never win

Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi · Post by **Asst. Asst. Lt. Cmdr. Smi** » 2002-07-16 08:00pm

At least it doesn't look like a dustbuster.

SirNitram · Post by **SirNitram** » 2002-07-16 08:28pm

It's a good idea, except for the stated stupid parts that try and make it too flashy.

Gods, just give them a good kinetic weapon or plasma rifle.. Phasers are never gonna be good enough.

SCVN 2812 · Post by **SCVN 2812** » 2002-07-16 10:24pm

Oh I dunno about that, show me some proof that a phaser on a high enough setting wouldn't be able to fuse an AT ST joint or simply vaporize a Stormtrooper?

CmdrWilkens · Post by **CmdrWilkens** » 2002-07-16 11:00pm

SCVN 2812 wrote:Oh I dunno about that, show me some proof that a phaser on a high enough setting wouldn't be able to fuse an AT ST joint or simply vaporize a Stormtrooper?

Show me proof that it could on such settings (especially when "overload" settings usually produce about as much explosive force as a singel M-80).

Typhonis 1 · Post by **Typhonis 1** » 2002-07-17 02:24am

its a good start get rid of the flashy parts and put in some decent iron sights ,maybe make it a bullpup configurtion?<IE trigger before mag >.and give it d rings for a sling

Grand Admiral Thrawn · Post by **Grand Admiral Thrawn** » 2002-07-17 09:12am

SCVN 2812 wrote:Oh I dunno about that, show me some proof that a phaser on a high enough setting wouldn't be able to fuse an AT ST joint or simply vaporize a Stormtrooper?

Don't you fucking try to switch the burden of proof! You make the claims, YOU back them up.

User099 · Post by **User099** » 2002-07-17 09:26am

I think I'm up to that, I can atleast prove that a hand-phaser greatly outpowers a blaster rifle.
For one thing, the most damage you see done by a blaster rifle SW is making a small burn mark on Stormtrooper armour, making a small burnmark on Leaia (I dont care about the spelling)'s arm, blowing R2D2's circuits, and that's about it. Forget Wong's crap about it melting the blast walls in Mos Eisleys, because if you took that as the power of a blaster rifle, half of the Princess' body would have liquified and pooled into a bunch of red crap, and R2D2 would have been reduced to a pile of molten slag.
Star Trek phasers? They've burned holes through solid rock, perhaps "vapourized" human forms, turned people into a little bit of melted bulkhead, turned a boulder into a chunk of slightly-cooled molten lava.. etc.
And that overload setting? If you take the power of a phaser exploding when overloaded as a testiment to it's strength, you'd have to take the power of the Death Star II exploding as a testiment to IT'S strength, IE we know it has the ability to turn planets into an asteroid field but its explosion was relatively insignificant next to that. So don't expect a phaser to detonate like a nuke.
Also, AT-ST weapons in ROTJ splintered a few trees, a hand phaser could have incinerated the tree in seconds. A couple of AT-ST shots obliterated another AT-ST.. what do you think would happen to it if subjected to sustained phaser fire?

Soontir C'boath · Post by **Soontir C'boath** » 2002-07-17 09:32am

User099 wrote:I think I'm up to that, I can atleast prove that a hand-phaser greatly outpowers a blaster rifle.
For one thing, the most damage you see done by a blaster rifle SW is making a small burn mark on Stormtrooper armour, making a small burnmark on Leaia (I dont care about the spelling)'s arm

And i've seen a phaser that only put a black splotch on a starfleet uniform so what?

Cyaround,
Jason

Howedar · Post by **Howedar** » 2002-07-17 03:50pm

User099 wrote:I think I'm up to that, I can atleast prove that a hand-phaser greatly outpowers a blaster rifle.
For one thing, the most damage you see done by a blaster rifle SW is making a small burn mark on Stormtrooper armour, making a small burnmark on Leaia (I dont care about the spelling)'s arm, blowing R2D2's circuits, and that's about it. Forget Wong's crap about it melting the blast walls in Mos Eisleys, because if you took that as the power of a blaster rifle, half of the Princess' body would have liquified and pooled into a bunch of red crap, and R2D2 would have been reduced to a pile of molten slag.
Star Trek phasers? They've burned holes through solid rock, perhaps "vapourized" human forms, turned people into a little bit of melted bulkhead, turned a boulder into a chunk of slightly-cooled molten lava.. etc.
And that overload setting? If you take the power of a phaser exploding when overloaded as a testiment to it's strength, you'd have to take the power of the Death Star II exploding as a testiment to IT'S strength, IE we know it has the ability to turn planets into an asteroid field but its explosion was relatively insignificant next to that. So don't expect a phaser to detonate like a nuke.
Also, AT-ST weapons in ROTJ splintered a few trees, a hand phaser could have incinerated the tree in seconds. A couple of AT-ST shots obliterated another AT-ST.. what do you think would happen to it if subjected to sustained phaser fire?

Fucking power settings you troll!

XaLEv · Post by **XaLEv** » 2002-07-17 04:46pm

What do I need to view this thing with?

Mr. B · Post by **Mr. B** » 2002-07-17 05:01pm

"Oh I dunno about that, show me some proof that a phaser on a high enough setting wouldn't be able to fuse an AT ST joint or simply vaporize a Stormtrooper?"

The heavy weapons the Rebels were using hit the ATAT legs several times, and didn't even slow it down.

Alyeska · Post by **Alyeska** » 2002-08-12 02:17pm

2000AD wrote:HAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!!!!!

GOD WHO MADE THIS

HAHAHAHAHAAA!!!

*calms down*

That's one of the funniest things i've seen. To me it looks like a modified M16 to me

*snigger*

This must have been another Trekkie Masturbating Fantasy. I have never seen a Phaser with a trigger guard or a ammo clip, and only the one that seems to have a scope and/or a shoulder stock is the one in STFC.

And sice when could you take a scope off and have "2-bumpies" come up?

And since when do you get a flashlight attached to your "targeting array". As far as I know flashlights are generally under the barrel.

Sorry I can't help it...

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!!!!

(sigh)

It was an attempt at fixing perceived problems in the basic design. The clip itself was photoshopped in to examine the possiblity of having an external clip, but it was eventually done away with. The flashlight was left up in with the targeting array because there is nothing wrong with having it there (incidently the FN P90 has its flashlight up top with the scope).

As to not having trigger guards?

http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/galle ... asers4.jpg

All three rifles were made for ST First Contact, the top one was the EVA model and has no trigger guard to allow for gloved use. On the other hand the two lower models were used exclussively inside the Enterprise, and both have trigger guards.

Now this is the current state of the Carbine I am working on.

http://community.webshots.com/storage/1 ... hVU_ph.jpg

The size of the pistol grip was fixed (I am surprised no one noticed how small it was) but a new trigger guard has yet to be placed on it. The iron sites also were moved back to give greater accuracy at range.

This is the current state that the full sized phaser rifle is in.

http://community.webshots.com/storage/1 ... qHv_ph.jpg

You might have to cut and paste to view the pictures.

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

Feddy Phasers

Feddy Phasers

Have you ever flashy thinged me?