All spelling errors have been bolded.
Stewart at SDI wrote:I went to the local Office Max last night to post photos, but they were unable to send them to you because your web site said that photos must be "Stored on line"?
All that money and expertise, and you don't know how to use an FTP?
I have the files saved to disk to send to you but I still have to learn how. Can and more importantly, will you tell me how to send my pic's to your page?
You don't know how to send an e-mail attachment?
How would you answer the ten questions I asked them? All threw this debate you have avoided answering most of my questions, attacking me instead. Or provided misleading answers like the "Free Electron Density Chart" as if it was more than tangentaly pertanent to our topic.
How so?
What is the mass of an electron compaired to a Hydrogen Nucleus?
Shouldn't you know that?
after reading part of Dr. Saxton's web page about explosions he would seem to agree with me. I would quote the part about the fireball expanding untill it reached "Equalibrium with the surrounding media" IF I knew how.
You don't even know how to CUT AND PASTE? You are a real piece of work Stewpot.
I have found the chart from your site that I had
refferanced earlier. It quotes/display's the atmospheric density for the 800Km above Earth. It is located here;
http://www.asu.cas.cz/~bezdek/density_t ... satm1a.png
I think it is much more
realivant than the Electron density chart that you cited. In it, there apier to be two orders of
magnatude differance between ~400 Km and were the curve flatens out between 7-800 Km alt. I think that those two orders of
magnatude are a crutch that you are using, like attacking me instead of answering my
possits so that you will not have to admit that the energy
yeald of the turbo laser is really quite pathetic.
Great strawman, really. Wong
has the turbolaser calcs on the site... you haven't done shit to prove them wrong.
Acording to Dr. Saxton's explosion energy chart, on the web page that your link sent me to, the asteroid blast in question, if it is 50M in diamiter, should have between 9.95x10^9th and 1.66x10^10 joules of energy in it. Even He appears to support my position.
Provide the link, and quote the relevent passage. Oh wait, I forgot: YOU DON'T KNOW HOW!
That I am not a debater and have poor spelling, garmer and computer skills does not change the validity of my conclusions.
Yes they do, shitwad. No credible "expert" would be caught dead typing like you do. That, combined with your ludicrous, unbacked (let's not forget
impossible) claims show beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are just some sad virgin living in your mother's basement, wanking to Janeway porn.