The ratings for Enterprise?

Dark Primus · Post by **Dark Primus** » 2002-12-13 05:32pm

Does anyone have figures on how many are watching the show?

Master of Ossus · Post by **Master of Ossus** » 2002-12-13 05:53pm

More than the show deserves.

TheDarkling · Post by **TheDarkling** » 2002-12-13 06:05pm

#101 Broken Bow 8.2
#103 Fight or Flight 7.4
#104 Strange New 7.4
#105 Unexpected 7.1
#106 Terra Nova 6.9
#107 The Andorian Incident 8.3
#108 Breaking the Ice 7.9
#109 Civilization 7.3
#110 Fortunate Son 7.1
#111 Cold Front 8.6
#112 Silent Enemy 8.0
#113 Dear Doctor 8.6
#114 Sleeping Dogs 7.7
#115 Shadows of P'Jem 7.9
#116 Shuttlepod One 7.4
#117 Fusion 7.2
#118 Rogue Planet 5.8
#119 Acquisition 7.3
#120 Oasis 6.8
#121 Detained 7.6
#122 Vox Sola 7.5
#123 Fallen Hero 8.1
#124 Desert Crossing 7.5
#125 Two Days And Two 7.5
#126 Shockwave 8.7

Season 2

#201 Shockwave, Part II 7.4
#202 Carbon Creek 7.6
#203 Minefield 7.9
#204 Dead Stop 8.6
#205 A Night In Sickbay 7.2
#206 Marauders 6.4
#207 The Seventh 7.5
#208 The Communicator 7.2
#209 Singularity 7.5
#210 Vanishing Point 6.2

From here (and yes I could have just posted the link, so sue me

)

http://www.treknation.com/episodes/

TheDarkling · Post by **TheDarkling** » 2002-12-13 06:07pm

Those arent the ratings (I double checked when they seemed to high) you have to click on each episode for the Neilsens (those are fans ratings - still seem to high to me but there you go)

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2002-12-13 06:35pm

So um, are those good or bad?

I've never been able to understand TV ratings...

une · Post by **une** » 2002-12-13 06:42pm

They went from 7.0/11 in Broken Bow, their first episode, to 2.5/4 in Vanishing Point, their 35th episode.

This show is going down faster than a vietnese hooker.

TheDarkling · Post by **TheDarkling** » 2002-12-13 06:42pm

Well for the UPN Enterprise gets slightly above the network avergae (3%-4% of people in the US with a TV watch enterprise) however other networks (except the WB) wouldn't give those sort of ratings the time of day (especially considering the timeslot) it usually comes 5 out of the 6 networks durnig that timeslot (beating only the WB).

So in short - its ok for the UPN but it is sliding.

TheDarkling · Post by **TheDarkling** » 2002-12-13 06:45pm

If you look at ratings either side of vanishing point they are higher, it seems the idea of Vanishing point just wasn't interesting (this weeks episode actually got 4 ish - maybe people like Tucker episodes but dislike Hoshi episodes?)

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-13 06:59pm

TheDarkling wrote:If you look at ratings either side of vanishing point they are higher, it seems the idea of Vanishing point just wasn't interesting (this weeks episode actually got 4 ish - maybe people like Tucker episodes but dislike Hoshi episodes?)

Maybe Hoshi needs to take her top off more often.

It might be because the episodes are really bad. Not really the featured characters.

On the other hand, I propose a new series. Star Trek: Sirius. It is all about Porthos. He runs around Enterprise getting into all sorts of mischief. Get it, Sirius, the dog star. Porthos it the star of the show. And he's a, well you get the idea.

And Hoshi could run around trying to find him. In the TOS uniforms.

This would be much more entertaining than Enterprise I have to say.

TheDarkling · Post by **TheDarkling** » 2002-12-13 07:02pm

I personally think people sure the episode and saw it was a "the next phase" clone and decided not to tune in - it was something of a low point, possibly something on another network?

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-13 07:11pm

TheDarkling wrote:I personally think people sure the episode and saw it was a "the next phase" clone and decided not to tune in - it was something of a low point, possibly something on another network?

You'd have to run an analysis on what else was on and see what had a high number of viewers in the same demographic as Enterprise.

une · Post by **une** » 2002-12-13 07:14pm

If you look at ratings either side of vanishing point they are higher, it seems the idea of Vanishing point just wasn't interesting (this weeks episode actually got 4 ish - maybe people like Tucker episodes but dislike Hoshi episodes?)

Their higher, but not much. Shockwave part two, for example, got less than half the ratings of Shockwave part one. The second season as a whole is doing only half as well as the first.

HemlockGrey · Post by **HemlockGrey** » 2002-12-13 07:16pm

Hopefully the sliding ratings will convince UPN to buy Firefly.

Spanky The Dolphin · Post by **Spanky The Dolphin** » 2002-12-13 07:20pm

When is Enterprise on, anyway?

Soontir C'boath · Post by **Soontir C'boath** » 2002-12-13 07:24pm

HemlockGrey wrote:Hopefully the sliding ratings will convince UPN to buy Firefly.

Don't forget for Paramount to fire them idiots.
Oh and I have a question....what are the ratings scaled to in terms of the audience watching?

Cyaround,
Jason

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-13 07:57pm

Spanky The Dolphin wrote:When is Enterprise on, anyway?

For me, PST, Wed. and Sun. at 8pm. Check tvguide.com

Sokar · Post by **Sokar** » 2002-12-14 03:06am

If you want to read some scathingly funny reviews of Enterprise , check out this web site :

http://www.firsttvdrama.com/enterprise/index.php3

Its great , and would serve as admirable ammo to petition for the termination of B&B who have managed to single handedly what no network could ever do , kill Star Trek......

MKSheppard · Post by **MKSheppard** » 2002-12-14 03:59am

Sokar wrote:If you want to read some scathingly funny reviews of Enterprise , check out this web site :

http://www.firsttvdrama.com/enterprise/index.php3

It's stupid at some times:

Here's a Gold Pressed Latinum Bar. Go buy a clue.

In the future, gold can be replicated, as has been established numerous times, including the communicator badges being made out of gold, and the Voyager episode that established that Fort Knox has been locked up because of its worthlessness.

Because gold can be replicated, this is why the Ferengis use a similar substitute - Gold Pressed Latinum, which apparently, can not be replicated. Yet in this episode the Ferengis strive to obtain Archer's gold bars. Huh? Why didn't they just replicate 100 gold bars and tell the Ferengi to go screw off?

THATS BECAUSE REPLICATORS HADN'T BEEN INVENTED YET YOU
STUPID SCREWBALL!!

Sokar · Post by **Sokar** » 2002-12-14 04:37am

True , his technical background isn't quite up to Sd.Net levels , but he gets it right most of the time. However in "Enterprise" , they do establish that they have near-replicators , just not as sophisticated as TNG era ones. Remeber according to TOS , "Enterprise" era vessels shouldnt have phase-anything for weapons , no view screens as such and the transporter is still just a clever concept. Enterprise fucks the canon info so badly it hurts to even think about it , and the show had such promise when I heard about it.

ZAROVE · Post by **ZAROVE** » 2002-12-15 08:29pm

The show had no hope, it was doomed form the start, its a B&B production, and they evden write most of the episodes themselves.

As to first TV Drama, I agree in oart with him, but then he compalins about archer wearing a ball cap and i actually defend enterprise, hatred shoudl not blind one.

Dark Primus · Post by **Dark Primus** » 2002-12-16 02:02am

I find it amazing and Idiotic that B&B can't find the reason why Enterprise is loosing ratings, they say people weren't ready for Enterprise.

neoolong · Post by **neoolong** » 2002-12-16 02:04am

Dark Primus wrote:I find it amazing and Idiotic that B&B can't find the reason why Enterprise is loosing ratings, they say people weren't ready for Enterprise.

People aren't. They aren't complete and utter moronic sheep like B&B need to support their show. Almost, but not totally.

Dark Primus · Post by **Dark Primus** » 2002-12-16 04:48am

neoolong wrote:
Dark Primus wrote:I find it amazing and Idiotic that B&B can't find the reason why Enterprise is loosing ratings, they say people weren't ready for Enterprise.
People aren't. They aren't complete and utter moronic sheep like B&B need to support their show. Almost, but not totally.

I say the style of Enterprise belongs to the 60' and 70's.

Typhonis 1 · Post by **Typhonis 1** » 2002-12-17 01:19am

The show treats the audiance like a bunch of idiots .We are already at the saturtion point for meaninglesss technobabael thanks to voyager

StarDestroyer.Net BBS

The ratings for Enterprise?

The ratings for Enterprise?

PROMISE?