Moderators: Alyrium Denryle, Edi, K. A. Pital
Bolded text by meGeorge W. Bush wrote:And so - by the way, we rank 10th amongst the industrialized world in broadband technology and its availability. That's not good enough for America. Tenth is 10 spots too low as far as I'm concerned. That means there are far too few actually ON the internet. We need to get broadband aviliable to a significant portion of the population, that way, when we tax the shit out of it, there won't be a massive discriminatory outcry.
Yeah. A thousand curses upon John Kerry for wanting to do that.Chardok wrote:Bolded text by meGeorge W. Bush wrote:And so - by the way, we rank 10th amongst the industrialized world in broadband technology and its availability. That's not good enough for America. Tenth is 10 spots too low as far as I'm concerned. That means there are far too few actually ON the internet. We need to get broadband aviliable to a significant portion of the population, that way, when we tax the shit out of it, there won't be a massive discriminatory outcry.
The 'common definition' would be wrong then; I was referring to the bell curve.Howedar wrote:I think so too, but the common definition of normal distribution would, I think, be a linear model. Technically, a normal distribution is a Gaussian bell.
~840-860 before 1995.Arthur_Tuxedo wrote:They changed the mean? What was it before?phongn wrote:To be slightly fair, the SATs have been recentered downward since GWB took it.
